Skip to main content
Log in

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring for the assessment of nicardipine as a third drug in severe essential hypertension

  • Originals
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The antihypertensive efficacy of sustained-release nicardipine compared to placebo as third-line therapy has been assessed by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in severly hypertensive patients with clinically unsatisfactory blood pressure control on 50 mg hydrochlorothiazide o.d. and 75 mg captopril b.d. Forty-two patients, 31 m and 11 f, with supine diastolic blood pressure 95–115 mm Hg after a 4 week run-in period on open hydrochlorothiazide and captopril, were randomly allocated to sustained-release nicardipine 45–60 mg/d or placebo.

At a visit to the clinic blood pressure and heart rate were measured 12 h after the evening dose by a trained observer unaware of the treatment. Twenty-four hour ambulatory monitoring was performed at the end of baseline and after 8 weeks of blinded medication.

There was no significant change in BD at the visit or on ambulatory monitoring in the placebo treated patients. In contrast, nicardipine produced a significant reduction in both blood pressures without affecting heart rate. Nicardipine also decreased the mean 24-h blood pressure by 14/10 mm Hg in patients whose clinical hypertension had been confirmed by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring but by only 3/2 mm Hg in ambulant patients who were normotensive on two-drug therapy.

One patient experienced an episode of severe symptomatic hypotension while on nicardipine. Otherwise, the numbers and percentages of patients from each group reporting adverse experiences were similar.

It is concluded that nicardipine appears to be an effective antihypertensive agent when used as third line therapy with diuretics and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors in patients with severe hypertension. In addition, since 40% of such patients already on two drug therapy were found to have a normal ambulatory blood pressure, the results reinforce the value of ambulatory monitoring in distinguishing hypertensives in whom more aggressive treatment may not by justified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Man In't Veld AJ (1989) Calcium antagonists in hypertension. Am J Med 86 [Suppl 4A]: 6–14

    Google Scholar 

  2. The 1988 report of the joint National Committee on detection, evaluation and treatment of high blood pressure. Arch Intern Med 148: 1023–38

  3. Singh BN, Josephson MA (1990) Clinical pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and hemodynamic effects of nicardipine. Am Heart J 119: 427–34

    Google Scholar 

  4. Salvetti A, Cardellino G, Pesenti M, Caiazza A, Ghisoni F, Del Prato C, Innocenti PF, Ponzanelli F, Errico M, Freda M, Borgnino C (1989) Antihypertensive effect of slow-release nicardipine, a placebo-controlled cross-over study. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 36: 439–442

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fagan TC, Brown R, Schnaper H, Smolens P, Montijo M, Michelson E, Conrad KA, Lessem J, Freedman D (1989) Nicardipine and hydrochlorothiazide in essential hypertension. Clin Pharmacol Ther 45: 429–438

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lessem JN, Barone EJ, Berl T (1989) Nicardipine and propanolol in the treatment of essential hypertension. Am J Hypertens 2: 146–153

    Google Scholar 

  7. Donnelly R, Elliott HL, Reid JL (1986) Nicardipine combined with enalapril in patients with essential hypertension. Br J Clin Pharmacol 22 [Suppl]: 283S-287S

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wallin JD, Fletcher E, Ram CVS (1989) Intravenous nicardipine for the treatment of severe hypertension. A double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial. Arch Intern Med 149: 2662–2669

    Google Scholar 

  9. Weber MA (1988) Automated blood pressure monitoring for the assessment of antihypertensive treatment. Am J Cardiol 62: 97C-102C

    Google Scholar 

  10. Graettinger WA, Lipson JL, Cheung DG, Weber MA (1988) Validation of portable non invasive blood pressure monitoring devices: comparison with intra-arterial and sphygmomanometer measurements. Am Heart J 116: 1155–1160

    Google Scholar 

  11. Weber MA, Cheung DG, Greatinger WF, Lipson JL (1988) Characterization of antihypertensive therapy by whole-day blood pressure monitoring. JAMA 259: 3281–3285

    Google Scholar 

  12. Poole-Wilson PA, Lipkin DP (1986) Lack of negative inotropic effect on heart muscle following infusion of nicardipine into patients with coronary disease. Effects of atrial pacing. Br J Clin Pharmacol 22: 3095–3115

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ram CVS, Gonzalez DG, Featherston W, Lugo C, Ralakis J, Kaplan NM (1990) Nicardipine and propanolol in the treatment of hypertension: similar antihypertensive but dissimilar hemodynamic actions. Am Heart J 119: 463–468

    Google Scholar 

  14. Webster J, Witte K, Rawles J, Petrie JC, Jeffers TA (1989) Evaluation of a long acting formulation of nicardipine in hypertension by clinic and home recorded blood pressures and doppler aortovelography. Br J Clin Pharmacol 27: 563–568

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cox JP, Ryan J, O'Brien E, O'Malley K (1989) The effect of slow-release nicardipine on ambulatory and clinic blood pressure in mild hypertension. Br J Clin Pharmacol 28: 79–82

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lacourcière Y, Poirier L, Dion D, Provencher P (1990) Antihypertensive effect of isradipine administered once or twice daily on ambulatory blood pressure. Am J Cardiol 65: 467–472

    Google Scholar 

  17. Heber ME, Brigden G, Al-Khawaja I, Raftery EB (1989) 24 h blood pressure control with the once daily calcium antagonist, amlodipine. Br J Clin Pharmacol 27: 359–365

    Google Scholar 

  18. White WB, Smith VE, McCabe EJ, Mieran MK (1985) Effects of chronic nitrendipine on casual and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure. Clin Pharmacol Ther 38: 60–64

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lacourcière Y, Carrier M, Toal CB (1989) Efficacy and tolerability of tiapamil in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 14: 166–170

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pickering TG, Devereux RB (1987) Ambulatory monitoring of blood pressure as a predictor of cardiovascular risk. Am Heart J 114: 925–927

    Google Scholar 

  21. Prisant LM, Carr AA (1990) Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and echocardiographic left ventricular wall thickness and mass. Am J Hypertens 3: 81–89

    Google Scholar 

  22. White WB, Schulman P, Karimeddini MK, Smith VE (1989) Regression of left ventricular mass is accompanied by improvement in rapid left ventricular filling following antihypertensive therapy with metoprolol. Am Heart J 117: 145–152

    Google Scholar 

  23. White WB (1989) Methods of blood pressure determination to assess antihypertensive agents: are casual measurements enough? Clin Pharmacol Ther 45: 581–589

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mejia AD, Egan BM, Schork NJ, Zweifler AJ (1990) Artefacts in measurements of blood pressure and lack of target organ involvement in the assessment of patients with treatment resistant hypertension. Ann Int Med 112: 270–277

    Google Scholar 

  25. Waeber B, Burnier M, Perret F, Nussberger J, Brunner HR (1989) Ambulatory blood pressure measurement and antihypertensive therapy. J HYpertension 7 [Suppl 3]: S33-S39

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lacourcière, Y., Poirier, L., Lévesque, C. et al. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring for the assessment of nicardipine as a third drug in severe essential hypertension. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 42, 131–136 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00278471

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00278471

Key words

Navigation