Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 50, Issue 2, pp 79–87 | Cite as

Recurring off-types in lettuce: Their significance in plant breeding and seed production

  • J. W. Maxon Smith


The lettuce cv. Valentine regularly produces non-heading off-type plants at the relatively high frequency of 4 × 10−3. They result from mutation to the dominant condition. A similar propensity has been reported twice before in lettuce; it is highly heritable.

The propensity to produce off-types was not present in the parents of Valentine so it must have arisen during the pedigree breeding programme. Closely related cultivars do not carry the character but it was subsequently transmitted to Dandie a new cultivar of which Valentine was one of the parents. Allelism tests to relate Valentine off-types to those in crisphead cultivars were not successful.

The elimination of off-types in breeding programmes is discussed. Contrary to the findings in day-neutral crisphead cultivars, mutant phenotypes in long-day butterhead cultivars have no selective advantage for seed production. Consequently, strict roguing ensures adequate varietal stability.

Key words

Lettuce Crisphead Cultivars Off-types Instability 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bohn, G.W.; Whitaker, T.W.: Recently introduced varieties of head lettuce and methods used in their development. Circ. U.S. Dep. Agric. 881, 27 (1951)Google Scholar
  2. Bremer, A.H.; Grana, J.: Genetische Untersuchungen mit Salat. II Gartenbauwissenschaft. 9, 231–245 (1935)Google Scholar
  3. Dixon, G.E.; Lewthwaite, J.J.: Lettuce. Rep. Natn. Veg. Res. Stn., 1971, 29 (1972)Google Scholar
  4. Jagger, I.C.; Whitaker, T.W.; Uselman, J.J.; Owen, W.M.: The Imperial strains of lettuce. Circ. U.S. Dep. Agric., 596, 15 (1941)Google Scholar
  5. Lindqvist, K.: Inheritance studies in lettuce. Hereditas, 46, 387–470 (1960)Google Scholar
  6. Maxon Smith, J.W.: The production, pedigrees and performance of four new glasshouse lettuce varieties. Hort. Res., 12, 127–140 (1972)Google Scholar
  7. Maxon Smith, J.W.: Lettuce. Rep. Glasshouse Crops Res. Inst. 1973, 37 (1974)Google Scholar
  8. Pearson, O.H.: The nature of the rogue in 456 lettuce. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 68, 270–278 (1956)Google Scholar
  9. Pearson, O.H.: Unstable gene systems in vegetable crops and implications for selection. Proc. Symposium Horticultural Plant Breeding. Hort. Science 3 (4), 271–274 (1968)Google Scholar
  10. Raleigh, G.; Minotti, P.L.: Lettuce production in muck soils. Extension Bull. Cornell University Agric. Exp. Stn., 1194, 16 (1967)Google Scholar
  11. Rodenburg, C.M. (Ed.): Varieties of lettuce, An international monograph. Varietal Description No. 3, I.V.T. Wageningen. N.V. Uitgevers-Maatschappij W.E.J. Tjeenk Willink, Zwolle, Holland; pp. 228 (1960)Google Scholar
  12. Thompson, R.C.; Ryder, E.J.: Description and pedigrees of nine varieties of lettuce. Tech. Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric. 1244, 19 (1961)Google Scholar
  13. Watts, L.E.: Synonomy in lettuce varieties. Rep. Natn. Veg. Res. Stn. 1954, 16–36 (1955)Google Scholar
  14. Welch, J.E.; Grogan, R.G.; Zink, F.W.; Kihara, G.M.; Kimble, K.A.: Calmar — a new lettuce variety resistant to downy mildew. Calif. Agric. 19, 8, 3–4 (1965)Google Scholar
  15. Whitaker, T.W.; Bohn, G.W.; Welch, J.E.; Grogan, R.G.: History and development of head lettuce resistant to downy mildew. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 72, 410–416 (1958)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. W. Maxon Smith
    • 1
  1. 1.Glasshouse Crops Research InstituteLittlehamptonEngland

Personalised recommendations