Skip to main content
Log in

Germ-line expression of the I factor, a functional LINE from the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster, is positively regulated by reactivity, a peculiar cellular state

  • Published:
Molecular and General Genetics MGG Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

I factor is a functional LINE (long interspersed nucleotidic element) which is mobilized in the germ-line of dysgenic SF females during I-R hybrid dysgenesis. Such females are obtained when an oocyte from a reactive stock, devoid of I factors but characterized by a level of reactivity, i.e. its potential for hybrid dysgenesis, is fertilized by a spermatozoon from an I factor-containing inducer stock. In a previous paper we described the expression of an I factor-lacZ fusion. Expression was detected in the ovaries of reactive and dysgenic flies only. In this paper we show that this transgenic activity can be quantified and depends upon the maternally inherited reactivity. Reactivity is not just a permissive state and modifiers of the reactivity level such as heat treatment and ageing change the level of expression of our transgenic fusion accordingly. Moreover, ageing through generations has the same cumulative and reversible effect on both reactivity and I factor expression. Using our fusion as a test for reactivity we show that the silencing of I factor after its introduction into a reactive genome may not be established in a single generation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abad P, Vaury C, Pélisson A, Chaboissier MC, Busseau I, Bucheton A (1989) A long interspersed repetitive element —the I factor of Drosophila teissieri— is able to transpose in different Drosophila species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86:8887–8891

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashburner M (1989) Drosophila, a laboratory handbook. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, pp 299–418

    Google Scholar 

  • Bregliano JC, Kidwell MG (1983) Hybrid dysgenesis determinants. In: Shapiro J (ed) Mobile Genetic Elements. Academic Press, New York, pp 363–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucheton A (1978) Non-mendelian female sterility in Drosophila melanogaster: influence of ageing and thermic treatments. I. Evidence for a partly inheritable effect of these two factors. Heredity 41:357–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucheton A (1979a) Non-mendelian female sterility in Drosophila melanogaster: influence of ageing and thermic treatments. II. Action of thermic treatments on the sterility of SF females and on the reactivity of reactive females. Biol Cell 34:43–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucheton A (1979b) Non-mendelian female sterility in Drosophila melanogaster: influence of ageing and thermic treatments. III. Cumulative effects induced by these factors. Genetics 93:131–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucheton A (1990) I transposable elements and I-R hybrid dysgenesis in Drosophila.Trends Genet 6:16–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucheton A, Picard G (1978) Non-mendelian female sterility in Drosophila melanogaster: heredity transmission of the reactive levels. Heridity 40:207–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucheton A, Lavige JM, Picard G, L'Heritier P (1976) Non-mendelian female sterility in Drosophila melanogaster: quantitative variations in the efficiency of inducer and reactive strains. Heredity 36:305–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucheton A, Paro R, Sang HM, Pélisson A, Finnegan DJ (1984) The molecular basis of I-R hybrid dysgenesis in Drosophila melanogaster: identification, cloning and properties of the I factor. Cell 38:153–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Busseau I, Pélisson A, Bucheton A (1989) I elements of D. melanogaster generate specific chromosomal rearrangements during transposition. Mol Gen Genet 218:222–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaboissier MC, Busseau I, Prosser J, Finnegan D, Bucheton A (1990) Identification of a potential RNA intermediate for transposition of the LINE-like element I factor in Drosophila melanogaster. EMBO J 9:3557–3563

    Google Scholar 

  • David J (1959) Etude quantitative du développement de la drosophile élevée en milieu axenique. Bull Soc Biol France Belgique 93:472

    Google Scholar 

  • David J, Biémont C, Fouillet P (1974) Sur la forme des courbes de ponte de Drosophila melanogaster et leur ajustement à des modeles mathématiques. Arch Zool Exp Genet 115:263–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Economou-Pachnis A, Lohse MA, Furano AV, Tsichlis PN (1985) Insertion of long interspersed repeated elements at the Igh (immunoglobulin heavy chain) and Mlvi-2 (Moloney leukemia virus integration 2) loci of rats. Proc Natl. Acad Sci USA 82:2857–2861

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans JP, Palmiter RP (1991) Retrotransposition of a mouse LI element. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:8792–8795

    Google Scholar 

  • Fasano L, Kerridge S (1988) Monitoring positional information during oogenesis in adult Drosophila. Development 104:245–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett DH, Lister, CK, Kellet E, Finnegan DJ (1986) Transposable elements controlling I-R hybrid dysgenesis in Drosophila melanogaster are similar to mammalian lines. Cell 47: 1007–1015

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnegan DJ (1988) I factor in Drosophila melanogaster and similar elements in other eucaryotes. In: Kingsman AJ, Kingsman SM, Chater KF (eds) Society for General Microbiology Symposium. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 271–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming JE, Quattrocki E, Latter G, Miquel J, Marcuson R, Zuckerkandi E, Bensch KG (1986) Age dependent changes in protein in Drosophila melanogaster. Science 231:1157–1159

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming FA, Walton JK, Dubitsky R, Bensch KG (1988) Ageing results in an unusual expression of Drosophila heat shock proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:4099–4103

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuerst TR, Knipple DC, MacIntyre RJ (1987) Purification and characterization of the β-galactosidase-1 from Drosophila melanogaster. Insect Biochem 17:1163–1171

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel A, Boeke JD (1991) Reverse transcriptase encoded by a retrotransposon from the trypanosomatid Crithidia fasciculata. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:9794–9798

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchison CA, Hardies SC, Loeb DD, Shehee WR, Edgell MH (1989) LINEs and related retroposons: long interspersed repeated sequences in the eucaryotic genome. In: Berg DE, Howe MM (eds) Mobile DNA. Am Soc Microbiol, Washington, DC, pp 593–617

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov VA, Melnikov AA, Siunov AV, Fador II, Ilyin YV (1991) Authentic reverse transcriptase is coded by jockey, a mobile Drosophila element related to mammalian LINEs. EMBO J 10:2489–2495

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakubczak JL, Xiong Y, Eickbush TH (1990) Type I (R1) and Type II (R2) ribosomal DNA insertions of Drosophila melanogaster are retrotransposable elements closely related to those of Bombyx mori. J Mol Biol 212:37–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen S, Heidmann T (1991) An indicator gene for detection of germline retrotransposition in transgenic Drosophila demonstrates RNA-mediated transposition of the LINE I element. EMBO J 10:1927–1937

    Google Scholar 

  • Katzir N, Rechavi G, Cohen JB, Unger T, Simoni F, Segals S, Cohen D, Givol D (1985 “Retroposon” insertion into the cellular oncogene C-myc in canine transmissible venereal tumor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82:1054–1058

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazazian HH, Wong C, Youssorifian M, Scott AF, Phillips DG, Antonarakis SE (1988) Haemophila A resulting from de novo insertions of L1 sequences represent a novel mechanism for mutation in man. Nature 322:164–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Lachaume P, Bouhidel K, Mesure M, Pinon H (1992) Spatial and temporal expression of the I factor during oogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. Development 115:729–735

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavige JM (1986) I-R system of hybrid dysgenesis in Drosophila melanogaster: further data on the arrest of development of the embryos from SF females. Biol Cell 56:207–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Lints FA (1987) Parental age effects. In: Lints FA, Soliman MM (eds) Drosophila as a model organism for ageing studies. Blackie and Son, London, pp 177–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathias SL, Scott AF, Kazazian HH, Boekc JD, Gabriel A (1992) Reverse transcriptase encoded by a human transposable element. Science 254:1808–1810

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller JH (1972) Assay of β-galactosidase. In: Experiments in Molecular genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Cold Spring Harbor, New York, pp 352–355

    Google Scholar 

  • Mizrokhi LJ, Georgieva SG, Ilying YV (1988) Jockey, a mobile Drosophila element similar to mammalian LINEs, is transcribed from the internal promoter by the RNA polymerase II. Cell 54:685–691

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse B, Rotherg PG, South VJ, Spandorfer JM, Astrin SM (1988) Insertional mutagenesis of the myc locus by a LINE-1 sequence in a human breast carcinoma. Nature 333:87–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Pardee AB, Jacob F, Monod J (1959) The genetic control and cytoplasmic expression of “inducibility” in the synthesis of β-galactosidase by E. coli. J Mol Biol 1:165–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Pélisson A (1979) The I-R system of hybrid dysgenesis in Drosophila melanogaster: influence on SF females sterility of their inducer and reactive paternal chromosomes. Heredity 43:423–428

    Google Scholar 

  • Pélisson A, Bregliano JC (1987) Evidence for rapid limitation of the I element copy number in a genome submitted to several generations of I-R hybrid dysgenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Gen Genet 207:306–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Pélisson A, Finnegan DJ, Bucheton A (1991) Evidence for retrotransposition of the I factor, a LINE element of Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:4907–4910

    Google Scholar 

  • Picard G (1976) Non-mendelian female sterility in Drosophila melanogaster: hereditary transmission of I factor. Genetics 83:107–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Picard G (1978) Non-Mendelian female sterility in Drosophila melanogaster, further data on chromosomal contamination. Mol Gen Genet 164:235–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Picard G, Bucheton A, Lavige JM, Fleuriet A (1972) Contribution à l'étude d'un phénomène de stérilité à déterminisme nonmendélien chez Drosophila melanogaster. CR Acad Sci [D] 275:933–936

    Google Scholar 

  • Picard G, Lavige JM, Bucheton A, Bregliano JC (1977) Non-Mendelian female sterility in Drosophila melanogaster: Physiological pattern of embryo lethality. Biol Cell 29:89–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Picard G, Bregliano JC, Bucheton A, Lavige JM, Pelisson A, Kidwell MG (1978) Non-Mendelian female sterility and hybrid dysgenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. Genet Res (Camb) 32:275–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard MA, Dura JM, Pélisson A, Bucheton A, Finnegan DJ (1988) A cloned I factor is fully functional in Drosophila melanogaster: a possible mechanism for transposition. Mol Gen Genet 214:533–540

    Google Scholar 

  • Rio D (1991) Regulation of Drosophila P element transposition. Trends Genet 7:282–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal-Bendirdjian E, Heidmann T (1991) Evidence for a reverse transcription intermediate for a marked LINE transposon in tumoral rat cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 181:863–870

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd JC, Walldorf U, Hug P, Gehring WJ (1989) Fruit flies with additional expression of the elongation factor EF-lα live longer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86:7520–7521

    Google Scholar 

  • Steller H, Pirrotta V (1985) A transposable P vector that confers selectable G418 resistance to Drosophila larval. EMBO J 4:167–171

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by D.J. Finnegan

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lachaume, P., Pinon, H. Germ-line expression of the I factor, a functional LINE from the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster, is positively regulated by reactivity, a peculiar cellular state. Molec. Gen. Genet. 240, 277–285 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00277067

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00277067

Key words

Navigation