Skip to main content
Log in

Unusual segregation of constitutional 11q;22q translocation may be explained by crossover in interchange segment, followed by 3∶1 segregation at meiosis I

  • Letters to the Editors
  • Published:
Human Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Budarf M, Sellinger B, Griffin C, Emanuel BS (1989) Comparative mapping of the constitutional and tumor-associated 11;22 translocations. Am J Hum Genet 45:128–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Iselius L, et al (1983) The 11q;22q translocation: a collaborative study of 20 new cases and analysis of 110 families. Hum Genet 64:343–355

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenbaum RH, Bobrow M (1975) Reciprocal translocations in man: 3∶1 meiotic disjunction resulting in 47- or 45-chromosome offspring. J Med Genet 12:29–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood DH, Farrier A, Hecht F, Allanson J (1989) Not all chromosome imbalance resulting from the 11q;22q translocation is due to 3∶1 segregation in first meiosis. Hum Genet 83:287–288

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lindenbaum, R.H. Unusual segregation of constitutional 11q;22q translocation may be explained by crossover in interchange segment, followed by 3∶1 segregation at meiosis I. Hum Genet 85, 143 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00276346

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00276346

Keywords

Navigation