Skip to main content
Log in

Dependent competing risks: a stochastic process model

Journal of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Analyses of human mortality data classified according to cause of death frequently are based on competing risk theory. In particular, the times to death for different causes often are assumed to be independent. In this paper, a competing risk model with a weaker assumption of conditional independence of the times to death, given an assumed stochastic covariate process, is developed and applied to cause specific mortality data from the Framingham Heart Study. The results generated under this conditional independence model are compared with analogous results under the standard marginal independence model. Under the assumption that this conditional independence model is valid, the comparison suggests that the standard model overestimates by 4% the effect on life expectancy at age 30 due to the hypothetical elimination of cancer and by 7% the effect for cardiovascular/cerebrovascular disease. By age 80 the overestimates were 11% for cancer and 16% for heart disease. These results suggest the importance of avoiding the marginal independence assumption when appropriate data are available — especially when focusing on mortality at advanced ages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Canada)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Abraham, S.: Total serum cholesterol levels of adults 18–74 years. Vital and Health Statistics Series 11. Data from the National Health Survey, No. 205, DHEW Pub. No. (PHS) 78-1652, NCHS, Hyattsville, MD, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arnold, B. C., Brockett, P. L.: Identifiability for dependent multiple decrement/competing risk models. Scand. Actuarial J. 117–127 (1983)

  3. Baum, H. M., Manton, K. G.: Cerebrovascular disease mortality: the relationship of underlying and associated causes of death. In review at American J. Public Health (1985)

  4. Chiang, C. L.: Introduction to stochastic processes in biostatistics. New York: Wiley 1968

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cohen, J., Liu, L.: Competing risks without independence. Manuscript (1984)

  6. Dellacherie, C.: Capacities and stochastic processes. Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer 1972

    Google Scholar 

  7. Economos, A. C.: Rate of aging, rate of dying and the mechanism of mortality. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 1, 3–27 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Greville, T. N.: Mortality tables analyzed by cause of death. Record American Inst. Actuaries 37, 283–294 (1948)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jacod, J.: Calcul stochastique et problèmes de martingales. In: Lect. Notes Math. 714. Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer 1979

  10. Keyfitz, N.: What difference would it make if cancer were eradicated? An examination of the Taeuber paradox. Demography 14, 411–418 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Klebba, A. J.: Mortality from diseases associated with smoking. Vital and Health Statistics Series 20. Data from the National Vital Statistics System, No. 17 DHHS Pub. No. (PHS) 82-1854, NCHS, Hyattsville, MD, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  12. Liptser, R. S., Shiryayev, A. N.: Statistics of random processes. Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer 1977

    Google Scholar 

  13. Manton, K. G., Stallard, E., Woodbury, M. A.: Chronic disease evolution and human aging: a general model for assessing the impact of chronic disease in human populations. Internat. J. Math. Modeling (special issue on math, modeling of diseases, M. Wirten, ed.), forthcoming (1986)

  14. Peterson, A. V.: Bounds for a joint distribution function with fixed sub-distribution functions: application to competing risks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 73, 11–13 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pollard, J. H.: The expectation of life and its relationship to mortality. J. Inst. Actuaries 109, 225–240 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Roberts, J.: Blood pressure levels in persons 6–74 years, United States, 1971–1974. Vital and Health Statistics Series 11. Data from the National Health Survey, No. 203, DHEW Pub. No. (HRA) 78-1648, NCHS, Hyattsville, MD, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shock, N. W., Greulich, R. C., Andres, R., Arenberg, D., Costa, P. T., Lakatta, E. G., Tobin, J. D.: Normal human aging: the Baltimore longitudinal study of aging. DHHS, Pub. No. (NIH) 84-2450. Washington, D.C.; USGPO 1984

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tsiatis, A.: A nonidentifiability aspect of the problem of competing risks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 72, 20–22 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tolley, H. D., Manton, K. G.: Comparing mortality risks with chronic conditions. Proc. American Stat. Assoc., Toronto Meeting (1984)

  20. Tolley, H. D., Manton, K. G.: Multiple cause models of disease dependency. Scand. Actuarial J. 211–226 (1983)

  21. Woodbury, M. A., Manton, K. G.: A random walk model of human mortality and aging. Theor. Popul. Biol. 11, 37–48 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Woodbury, M. A., Manton, K. G.: A theoretical model of the physiological dynamics of circulatory disease in human populations. Human Biol. 55, 417–441 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Yashin, A. I.: Hazard rates and probability distributions: Representation of random intensities. WP-84-21, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria (1984)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yashin, A.I., Manton, K.G. & Stallard, E. Dependent competing risks: a stochastic process model. J. Math. Biology 24, 119–140 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00275995

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00275995

Key words

Navigation