Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of limited irrigation on lettuce and chinese cabbage yields

  • Published:
Irrigation Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Yield response of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) and Chinese cabbage (Brassica campestris L. Group pekinensis) to eight different drip irrigation rates was determined in 1980–1984 at Lalamilo, Hawaii. Treatments were arranged in a gradient irrigation design replicated three times and were irrigated daily with amounts ranging from 0.76 mm to 6.09 mm. Yield response from a 0 treatment, equal to rainfall, was also measured. Marketable yield increased linearly with increased water application up to 49.7 Mg/ha for lettuce and 73.1 Mg/ha for Chinese cabbage with an associated seasonal evapotranspiration of 205 mm and 209 mm for lettuce and Chinese cabbage, respectively. The relationship between deficit relative yield (yield divided by maximum yield) and deficit relative evapotranspiration (evapotranspiration divided by maximum evapotranspiration) was linear with a deficit response coefficient of 1.07 for lettuce and 1.35 for Chinese cabbage. Marketable percentage of total potential biomass production decreased linearly with a decrease in marketable yield. Lettuce head size also decreased linearly with a decrease in marketable yield. Water use efficiency (yield divided by water applied) was 24 and 36 kg/m3 of water for lettuce and Chinese cabbage, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bar-Yosef B, Sagiv B (1982a) Response of tomatoes to N and water applied via a trickle irrigation system. I. Nitrogen. Agron J 74:633

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Yosef B, Sagiv B (1982b) Response of tomatoes to N and water applied via a trickle irrigation system. II. Water. Agron J 78:637

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucks DA, Erie LJ, French, OR (1974) Quantity and frequency of trickle and furrow irrigation for efficient cabbage production. Agron J 66:53

    Google Scholar 

  • Doorenbos J, Kassam AH (1979) Yield response to water. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 33

  • Hanks RJ, Rasmussen, VP (1982) Predicting crop production as related to plant water stress. Adv in Agron 35:193

    Google Scholar 

  • Kallsen CE, Sammis TW, Gregory EJ (1984) Nitrogen and yield as related to water use of spring barley. Agron J 76:59

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratky BA, Wang JK, Kubojiri K (1982) Effects of container size, transplant age, and plant spacing on Chinese cabbage. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 107:345

    Google Scholar 

  • Sammis TW (1980) Comparison of sprinkler trickle subsurface and furrow irrigation methods for row crops. Agron J 72:701

    Google Scholar 

  • Sammis TW, Wu IP (1986) Fresh market tomato yields as affected by deficit irrigation using a mico-irrigation system. Agric Water Manag 12:117

    Google Scholar 

  • Shih SF, Rahi GS (1984) Evapotranspiration of lettuce in relation to water table depth. Trans ASAE 27:1074

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu IP (1972) Consumptive use and irrigation scheduling of Hawaiian vegetable crops. IXTSA conference papers of ASAE Special Publication SP-01-72, pp 247–251

  • Wu IP, Gitlin HH (1977a) Optimal irrigation schedule for lettuce. Engineer's Notebook 101. Cooperative Extension Service, University of Hawaii, Honolulu

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu IP, Gitlin HH (1977b) Optimal irrigation application for lettuce. Engineer's Notebook 102. Cooperative Extension Service, University of Hawaii, Honolulu

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sammis, T.W., Kratky, B.A. & Wu, I.P. Effects of limited irrigation on lettuce and chinese cabbage yields. Irrig Sci 9, 187–198 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00275431

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00275431

Keywords

Navigation