Summary
Advanced irrigation methods and water management practices are needed for high yields with minimum water applications: A three-year study using recently introduced surface-micro and level-basin irrigation methods was conducted in central Arizona on a nonuniform sandy loam soil to determine optimum water placement and irrigation frequency. Several newer, short staple cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) cultivars and different row spacings were also evaluated. Precision micro and level-basin irrigation systems achieved maximum lint yields of more than 2,000 kg/ha and lint water use efficiencies in excess of 0.21 kg/m3. A single micro line per every two rows irrigated daily averaged about 25% more lint cotton than every furrow, level-basin treatment irrigated every two weeks. With a micro irrigation line per every three rows, yields were reduced by an average of 15% and as much as 33% compared with a micro line per every two rows. The cotton production on the narrow row (0.75 m) spacing with a 33% higher plant population outyielded the conventional row (1.0 m) spacing by about 15% in the third year. In addition, some of the newer cotton cultivars had a lower water requirement than the ones prevalent 10 years ago. In the future, cotton growers should be able to irrigate with less water by using improved irrigation systems and water management practices.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ayars JE, Hutmacher RB, Schoneman RA, Vail SS, Felleke D (1986) Drip irrigation of cotton with saline drainage water. Trans ASAE 29:1668
Bordovosky DG, Jordon WR, Hiler EA, Howell TA (1974) Choice of irrigation timing indicator for narrow row cotton. Agron J 66:88
Bucks DA, Erie LJ, French OF (1973) Limiting quantities and varying frequencies of trickle irrigation on cotton. Prog Agric in Arizona 25:13
Buxton DR, Briggs RE, Patterson LL, Watkins AD (1977) Canopy characteristics of narrow-row cotton as influenced by plant density. Agron J 69:929
Buxton DR, Patterson LL, Briggs RE (1979) Fruiting pattern in narrow-row cotton. Crop Sci 19:77
Constable GA (1977a) Narrow row cotton, Manoi Valley. I. Growth, yield, and quality of four cultivars. Australian J Exp Agric and Husb 17:135–142
Constable GA (1977b) Narrow row cotton, Manoi Valley. II. Plant population and row spacing. Aust J Exp Agric Animal Husb 17:143
Constable GA, Gleeson AE (1977) Growth and distribution of dry matter in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Aust J Agric Res 28:249
Daubert J, Ayer H (1982) Laser leveling and farm profits. University of Arizona, Agric Exp Stn, and US Department of Agriculture, Nat Res Econ Div Technical Bull 244, Tucson, AZ, 13 p
Davis KR (1983) Trickle irrigation of cotton in California. Proc Western Cotton Prod Conf, Las Cruces, NM, pp 34–38
Dedrick AR (1984) Cotton yields and water use on improved furrow irrigation systems. Proc Specialty Conf, Irrig and Drainage Div, Flagstaff, AZ, pp 175–182
Dedrick AR, Erie LJ Clemmens AJ (1982) Level-basin irrigation. In: D. Hillel (ed) Advances in Irrigation, Vol 1. Academic Press, New York, p 105–145
Doorenbos J, Kassam AH (1979) Yield response to water. Irrig and Drainage Paper 33, Food and Agric Organization of the United Nations, Rome
Doorenbos J, Pruitt WO (1977) Crop water requirements. Irrig and Drainage Paper 24, Food and Agric Organization of the United Nations, Rome
Erie LJ, Dedrick AR (1979) Level-basin irrigation: a method for conserving water and labor. US Department of Agriculture, Agric Res Ser, Farmers Bull 2261, US Govt Printing Office, Washington DC
Erie LJ, French OF, Bucks DA, Harris K (1982) Consumptive use of water by major crops in the Southwestern United States. US Department of Agriculture, Agric Res Ser, Conservation Report 29, US Govt Printing Office, Washington DC
Fangmeier DD, Mohammed RA (1977) Irrigation management of short-season, high-population cotton. Trans ASAE 20:869
Fereres E, Cuevas R, Orgaz F (1985) Drip irrigation of cotton in southern Spain. Proc Third Int Drip/Trickle Irrig Congr, ASAE Publication 10–85, Vol II, ASAE, St. Joseph, Michigan
Francois LE (1982) Narrow row cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) under saline conditions. Irrig Sci 3:149
Grimes DW (1982) Water requirements and use patterns of the cotton plant. Proc Western Cotton Prod Conf, Phoenix, Arizona
Grimes DW, Dickens DL (1977) Irrigation water management of cotton for a planting configuration and variety conductive to short-season development. University of California. Water Sci and Engr Paper 7003, Davis, California
Howell TA, Davis KR, McCormick RL, Yamada H, Walhood VT, Meek DW (1984) Water use efficiency of narrow row cotton. Irrig Sci 5:195
Howell TA, Meron M, Davis KR, Phene CJ (1987) Water management of trickle and furrow irrigated narrow row cotton in the San Joaquin Valley. Applied Eng Agric 3:222
Jensen ME (ed) (1974) Consumptive use of water and irrigation water requirements. Technical Committee on Irrigation Water Requirements, ASCE, New York
Koli SE, Morrill LG (1976) Influence of nitrogen, narrow rows, and plant population on cotton yield and growth. Agron J 68:897
Meron M, Phene CJ, Howell TA, Davis KR, Grimes DW (1984) Scheduling of drip irrigated narrow row cotton. Proc Specialty Conf, Irrig and Drainage Div, ASCE, Flagstaff, Arizona, p 711
Nakayama FS, Bucks DA (eds) (1986) Trickle irrigation for crop production: Design, operation, and management. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam
Oron G (1984) Yield of single versus twin-row trickle irrigated cotton. Agric Water Manag 9:237
Phene CJ, Davis KR, Howell TA, McCormick HI, Nightengale HI, Meek DW (1984) Evapotranspiration and water use efficiency of trickle irrigated cotton. ASAE Paper 84-2625, ASAE, St. Joseph, Michigan
Phene CH, McCormick RL, Miyamoto JM, Meek DW, Davis KR (1985a) Evapotranspiration and crop coefficient of trickle-irrigated tomatoes. Proc Third Int Drip/Trickle Irrig Congr, ASAE Publication 10–85, vol II, ASAE, St. Joseph, Michigan, p 823
Phene CJ, Meek DW, Davis KR, McCormick RL, Hutmacher RB (1985b) Real time evapotranspiration and determination of crop coefficients. Proc Natl Conf on Advances in Evapotranspiration, ASAE Publication 14–85, St. Joseph, Michigan, p 122
Plant Z, Rom M, Meiri A (1985) Cotton response to subsurface trickle irrigation. Proc Third Int Drip/Trickle Irrigation Congr, ASAE Publication 10–85, vol II, ASAE, St. Joseph, Michigan, p 916
Pruitt WO, Fereres E, Henderson DW, Hagan RM (1984) Evapotranspiration losses of tomatoes under drip and furrow irrigation. Calif Agric 38:10
Taylor BB (1986) Drip irrigation — the Arizona story. Proc Drip Irrigated Cotton Symposium, Midland, Texas, p 7
Taylor BB, Pennington DA, Hoffmann WC, Briggs RE, Matthias AD, Stedman SW (1983) Proc Western Cotton Prod Conf, Las Cruces, New Mexico, p 31
Tollefson S (1985) Subsurface drip irrigation of cotton and small grains. Proc. Third Int Drip/Trickle Irrig Congr, ASAE Publication 10–85, vol II, ASAE, St. Joseph, Michigan, p 887
Tucker TC, Tucker DB (1968) Nitrogen nutrition. In: Elliot FC et al. (eds), Advances in prediction and utilization of quality cotton: principles and practices. Iowa State Univ Press, Ames, Iowa, p 183
Williams DC, Hanson EG (1973) Subsurface irrigation of cotton: A system and its effects upon production, with and without fertilizer application. New Mexico State University, Agric Exp Stn Bull 610, Las Cruces, New Mexico
Wilson P, Ayer H, Snider G (1984) Drip irrigation for cotton: Implications for farm profits. US Department of Agriculture, Econ Res Ser, Agric Econ Report 517
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Contribution of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Pacific West Area
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bucks, D.A., Allen, S.G., Roth, R.L. et al. Short staple cotton under micro and level-basin irrigation methods. Irrig Sci 9, 161–176 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00275429
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00275429