Skip to main content
Log in

Predictions of non-linear responses to selection for forage yield under competition

  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The expected response of a population of competing genotypes to selection of high yielding individuals is expressed in terms of a regression model of a type similar to that used to describe genotype-environment interactions (Perkins and Jinks 1968). It is shown that response to selection on the basis of the yielding ability of genotypes (direct effects) can also cause changes in the magnitude of their effects on their neighbours (indirect effects) and on the interactions of direct and indirect effects. Thus, if yij = μ + gi aj + γjgi + sij, where yij is the expected yield of the ith genotype in competition with the jth, gi is the direct effect of the ith genotype, aj the indirect effect of the jth, and γj the regression onto direct effects of interactions involving the jth associate, it follows that response is R(g) = g(1+b(a/g) + bγ/gg), where g is the change in average direct effect of the population brought about by selection, and b represents a regression coefficient. If b(γ/g) is important, then response to selection will be non-linear over a range of genotypes, and where it is negative, then selection will become progressively less effective as it proceeds until a plateau is reached, beyond which it will be detrimental.

Estimates of the above parameters were made from nine sets of data from diallel arrangements of binary mixtures. Although a degree of uncertainly was induced in these estimates by the need to reparametrize the model describing competition within and between binary components to cater only for inter-genotypic effects, the consistency of the prediction of non-linearity of response induces some confidence in the results. Predicted optima are as low as 8 pc abovethe mean inthe case of closely related material. Other deficiencies and implications of this selection model are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature

  • Breese, E.L.; Hill, J.: Regression analysis of interactions between competing species. Heredity 31, 181–200 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhart, S.A.; Russell, W.A.: Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci. 6, 36–40 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  • England, F.E.: Competition in mixtures of herbage grasses. J. appl. Ecol. 5, 227–242 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  • Finlay, K.W.; Wilkinson, G.N.: The analysis of adaption in a plant breeding programme. Austr. J. agric. Res. 14, 742–754 (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallais, A.: Sur quelques aspects de la compétition en amélioration des plantes. Ann. Amélior. Plantes 25, 51–64 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffing, B.: Selection in reference to biological groups. I. Individual and group selection applied to populations of unordered groups. Austr. J. Biol. Sci. 20, 127–139 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, J.: Methods of analysing competition with special reference to herbage plants. II. Effects of associate plants. J. agric. Sci. Camb. 81, 91–98 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, J.: Methods of analysing competition with special reference to herbage plants. III. Monocultures v. binary mixtures. J. agric. Sci. Camb. 83, 57–65 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacquard, P.; Caputa, J.: Comparaison de trois modèles d'analyse des relations sociales entre especes végétales. Ann. Amelior. Plantes 20, 115–158 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  • Moav, R.; Wohlfarth, G.H.: Magnification through competition of genetic differences in Carp. Heredity 33, 181–202 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Norrington-Davies, J.: Diallel analysis of competition between grass species. J. agric. Sci. 71, 223–231 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  • Norrington-Davies, J.; Crowley, J.G.: Effect of density and fertility on the competitive interactions of diploid and tetraploid ryegrass during early growth. Ir. J. agric. Res. 8, 359–374 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, J.M.; Jinks, J.L.: Environmental and genotype-environmental components of variability. IV. Non-linear interactions for multiple inbred lines. Heredity 23, 525–535 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  • Utz, H.F.: Die Zerlegung der Genotyp X Umwelt-Interaktionen. EDV in Medizin und Biologie 2, 52–59 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  • Willey, R.W.; Heath, S.B.: The quantitative relationships between population and crop yield. Adv. in Agronomy 21, 281–321 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, E.J.: The analysis of competition experiments. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 15, 509–525 (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, A.J.: The analysis and prediction of some two factor interactions in grass breeding. J. agric. Sci. Camb. 76, 301–306 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by R. Riley

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wright, A.J. Predictions of non-linear responses to selection for forage yield under competition. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 49, 201–207 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00274474

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00274474

Keywords

Navigation