Skip to main content
Log in

Genetic variability and advance under four selection procedures in wheat pedigree breeding programme

  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Four methods of generation advance (SPS, SSD, BP and MMS) were compared in F3 and F4 generations. In the F3 generation, the SPS and SSD methods of generation advance proved superior to the BP and MMS methods for grain yield per plant and for at least one of the yield component traits. The F3 SSD population did not differ significantly from the F3 SPS for any of the traits. However, the F3 SSD population retained more range and cv for different traits than with other methods of generation advance. F4 progenies derived from F3 SSD population were significantly superior for grain yield than lines derived from the other three F3 populations. The MMS method of generation advance proved useful for increasing the 1,000-grain weight for which initial selection was made.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alessandroni A, Scalfati MC (1973) Early generation selection for grain yield of dwarf and semi-dwarf progenies of durum wheat crosses. Proc 4th Int Wheat Genet Symp Agric Expt Station Univ. of Missouri, pp 475–482

  • Allard RW, Hansche PE (1964) Some parameters of population variability and their implication in plant breeding. Adv Agron 16:281–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker RJ (1971) Theoretical variance of response to modified pedigree selection. Can J Plant Sci 51:463–465

    Google Scholar 

  • Casali VWD, Tigchelaar EC (1975) Breeding progress in tomato with pedigree and single seed descent. J Abstr Soc Hortic Sci 100:362–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahiya B, Singh VP (1986) Comparison of single seed descent, selective intermating and mass selection for seed size in green-gram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek). Theor Appl Genet 72:678–681

    Google Scholar 

  • Derera NF, Bhatt GM (1972) Effectiveness of mechanical mass selection in wheat. Aust J Agric Res 23:761–768

    Google Scholar 

  • Empig ET (1975) Genetic variances in self-fertilized populations under various breeding methods. Phil Agric 59:205–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill WG (1974) Variability of response to selection in genetic experiments. Biometrics 30:363–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurd EA, Townley Smith TF, Patterson LA, Dwen CH (1972). Techniques used in producing Wascana durum wheat. Can J Plant Sci 52:689–691

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings PR, Herrera PM (1968) Studies on competition in rice. II. Competitions in segregating population. Evolution 22:332–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalifa MA, Qualset CO (1975) Intergenotypic competition between tall and dwarf wheats. II. In hybrid bulks. Crop Sci 15:640–644

    Google Scholar 

  • Knott DR (1972) Effect of selection of F2 plant yield on subsequent generations in wheat. Can J Plant Sci 52:721–726

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar J (1973) Early generation selection and comparison of two breeding methods in wheat (T. aestivum L.). PhD Thesis, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar J, Raina SK, Verma MM (1979) Comparison of three methods of generation advance in barley. Proc 1st Nat Symp Barley, ICAR, New Delhi, pp 71–79

    Google Scholar 

  • McGinnies RG, Shebeski LH (1968) The reliability of single plant selection for yield in F2. Proc 3rd Int Wheat Genet Symp, Canberra, Australia, pp 410–415

  • Mehla AS, Singh VP, Singh RK (1981) Effect of directed selection for grain size on morphological variation in barley. Perspect Cytol Genet 3:461–464

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawar IS, Paroda RS, Singh S (1986) A comparison of pedigree selection, single seed descent and bulk method in two wheat crosses (T. aestivum L. em. Thell). Crop Improv 13:34–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Rana RK (1984) Pattern and amount of variability and selection limits in some simple and multiple crosses of wheat (T. aestivum L.). PhD Thesis, Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar

    Google Scholar 

  • Rana RK, Singh RK, Singh KP (1983) Mechnical mass selection on seed size and its correlated response in wheat. Abstract of paper contributed at XV Int Congr of Genet, New Delhi, p 598

  • Riggs TJ, Snape JW (1977) Effect of linkage and interaction in a comparison of theoretical population derived by diplodized haploid and single seed descent methods. Theor Appl Genet 45:157–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy MN (1976) Inter-genotypic plant competition in wheat under SSD breeding. Euphytica 25:219–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Snape JW, Riggs TJ (1975) General consequences of single seed descent in breeding of self pollinated crops. Heridity 35:212–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Tee TS (1971) Comparison of single seed descent and bulk population breeding methods and evaluation of single seed selection in wheat (F. aestivum L.) PhD Thesis University of California, Davis

    Google Scholar 

  • Tee TS, Qualset CU (1975) Bulk population in wheat breeding: Comparison of single seed descent and random bulk methods. Euphytica 24:393–403

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by G. S. Khush

Part of Ph.D. Thesis submitted by senior author to Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Srivastava, R.B., Paroda, R.S., Sharma, S.C. et al. Genetic variability and advance under four selection procedures in wheat pedigree breeding programme. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 77, 516–520 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00274272

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00274272

Key words

Navigation