Skip to main content
Log in

Optimum/adaptive incremental sequence in nonlinear analysis

  • Published:
Computational Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An approach to improve the accuracy of the incremental solutions to a nonlinear problem, through a strategy to control the size of the increment, based on stationary of an argumented energy functional, is presented. The problem of control of an optimum step size in the incremental theory is formulated for a fixed number of increments. The variables in this argumented functional are: (i) the incremental displacement vector, (ii) the scalar parameters λ i which characterize the size of each of the increments, i = 1,..., N, and (iii) a Lagrange multiplier μ which enforces the constraint that the sum of all the normalized increments, i. e., Σλi is equal to 1. The optimality condition provides us a rigorous approach which gives rise to an iterative procedure because of nonlinearity of the stationary condition. If the number of increments is not prescribed, a noniterative procedure can be obtained, where the incremental sequence is controlled adaptively with less computational effort. The extension of the proposed method to non-selfadjoint problems, where a potential energy function does not exist, is also discussed. Numerical examples demonstrate the remarkable improvement in the accuracy of the solution by optimizing the incremental sequence, as well as the effectiveness of the adaptive control procedure proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bergan, P.G.; Soreide, T.H. (1973): A comparative study of different numerical solution techniques as applied to a nonlinear structural problem. Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 2, 185–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergan, P.G.; Horrigmoe, G.; Krakeland, B.; Soreide, T.H. (1978): Solution techniques for non-linear finite element problems. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 12, 1677–1696

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergan, P.G.; Holand, I.; Soreide, T.H. (1979): Use of the current stiffness parameter in solution of nonlinear problems. In: Glowinski, R.; Rodin, E.Y.; Zienkiewicz, O.C. (Eds.) Energy method in finite element analysis, pp 265–282. Chichester: Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, W.E. (1978): On the reformulation of the finite element method. Comp. Struct. 8, 547–552

    Google Scholar 

  • Crisfield, M.A. (1981): A fast incremental/iterative solution procedure that handles ‘snap-through’. Comp. Struct, 13, 55–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Krieg, R.D.; Krieg, D.B. (1977): Accuracies of numerical solution methods for the elastic-perfectly plastic method. Trans. ASME, J. Pressure Vessel Tech. 99, 510–515

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeice, G.M.; Marcal, P. V. (1973): Optimization of finite element grids based on minimum potential energy. Trans. ASME, J. Eng. Industry 90, 168–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, P. (1973): Some properties of linear strain triangles and optimal finite element methods. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 7, 415–429

    Google Scholar 

  • Prager, W. (1975): A note on the optimal finite element grids. Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 6, 363–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Riks, E. (1979): An incremental approach to the solution of snapping and buckling problems. Int. J. Solids Struct. 15, 529–551

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, W.F. (1978): Adaptive step size selection for use with the continuation method. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 12, 677–694

    Google Scholar 

  • Seguchi, Y.; Tanaka, M.; Tomita, Y. (1981): Optimal finite element discretization—A dynamic programming approach. Proc. Int. Symp. Optimum Structural Design, Univ. Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA, pp 13/13–13/19

    Google Scholar 

  • Shephard, M.S.; Gallagher, R.H. Eds. (1979): Finite element grid optimization. New York: ASME

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha, D.K.; Hsu, T.R. (1983): On the optimum load step size selection scheme for nonlinear finite element stress analysis. Comp. Struct. 17, 149–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Siu, D.; Turche, D. (1981): Optimal finite element discretization for nonlinear constitutive relations. Comp. Struct. 13, 83–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, G.R. (1973): A variable step size incremental procedure. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 17, 563–566

    Google Scholar 

  • Tracy, D.M.; Freese, C.E. (1981): Adaptive load incrementation in elastic-plastic finite element analysis. Comp. Struct. 13, 45–53

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by G. Yagawa, December 18, 1985

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tanaka, M., Seguchi, Y. Optimum/adaptive incremental sequence in nonlinear analysis. Computational Mechanics 1, 243–257 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00273701

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00273701

Keywords

Navigation