Summary
There is an inherent bias in intraclass correlations since the expectation of a ratio does not equal the ratio of expectations. A simple accurate approximation for this bias is derived, and it is found that the inherent bias is usually negligible. Selection of sires is known to bias half-sib heritability estimates, and appropriate formulae are given and discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature
Buckland, R.B.: Genetic influences on the activity of some enzymes in fresh and stored chicken semen and their relationships to fertility. In: R. Bogart (Ed.), Genetics Lectures, Vol.4, 39–67. Corvallis: Oregon State U.P. 1975
Cochran, W.G.: Improvement by means of selection. Proc. 2nd. Berkeley. Symp. Math. Statist. Probab. 1950, 449–470 (1951)
Ginsburg, E.H.: On the planning of the experiment on estimation of intraclass correlation. Biom. Z. 15, 47–52 (1973)
Morley, F.H.W.: Selection for economic characters in Australian Merino sheep. V. Further estimates of phenotypic and genetic parameters. Aust. J. agric. Res. 6, 77–90 (1955)
Pederson, D.G.: The estimation of heritability and degree of dominance from a diallel cross. Heredity 27, 247–264 (1971)
Reeve, E.C.R.: Studies in quantitative inheritance. III. Heritability and genetic correlation in progeny tests using different mating systems. J. Genet. 51, 520–542 (1953)
Rønningen, K.: The effect of selection of progeny performance on the heritability estimated by half-sib correlation. Acta Agric. Scand. 22, 90–92 (1972)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Communicated by J.S.F. Barker
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ponzoni, R.W., James, J.W. Possible biases in heritability estimates from intraclass correlation. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 53, 25–27 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00273132
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00273132