Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of different methods of half-diallel analysis

  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A comparison among various forms of half-diallel analysis was made. The different half-diallel techniques used were: Griffing's model I, method 2 and 4, Morley-Jones' model; Walters and Morton's model, and Gardner and Eberhart's model. All these methods of diallel analysis were found to be interrelated. However, as the Gardner and Eberhart's model partitioned heterosis into different components as well as gave information about combining ability, this method had certainly some advantages over the others. The results further indicated the possibility of dominance variance being confounded with the additive variance of general combining ability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chung JH, Stevenson E (1973) Diallel analysis of the genetic variation in some quantitative traits in dry beans. NZJ Agric Res 16:223–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner CO, Eberhart SA (1966) Analysis and interpretation of the variety cross diallel and related population. Biometrics 22:439–452

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffing B (1956) Concept of general and specific combining ability in relation to diallel crossing systems. Aust J Biol Sci 9:463–493

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta VP, Ramanujam S (1974) Cumulative gene effects and genetic parameters of heterosis in F1 and F2 generation of chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.). Genetika 6:263–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta VP, Ramanujam S, Kaul AK (1974) Genetic analysis in respect to protein content and protein quality in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Genetika 6:231–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes JD, Paroda RS (1974) Parental generation in relation to combining ability analysis in spring barley. Theor Appl Genet 44:373–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayman BI (1954) The analysis of variance of diallel tables. Biometrics 10:235–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Jugenheimer RW (1976) Corn improvement, seed production and uses. John Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearsey MJ (1965) Biometrical analysis of random mating population: a comparison of five experimental designs. Heredity 20:205–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Matzinger DF (1963) Experimental estimates of genetic parameters and their application in self fertilizing plants. In: Hanson WD, Robinson HF (eds) Statistical genetics and plant breeding. NAS-NRC, Washington, pp 81–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Morley-Jones R (1965) Analysis of variance on the half diallel table. Heredity 20:117–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters DE, Morton JR (1978) On the analysis of variance of a half diallel table. Biometrics 34:91–94

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by A. Robertson

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Singh, M., Singh, R.K. A comparison of different methods of half-diallel analysis. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 67, 323–326 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00272868

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00272868

Key words

Navigation