Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluation of ileum interposition in ureterosigmoidostomy: Experimental studies

  • Originals
  • Published:
Urological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Experiments in juvenile house pigs with a valved uretero-ileosigmoidostomy were performed, and the advantages of this procedure as against common methods were assessed. Postoperative studies up to 6 months revealed encouraging results in respect of function, infection rate, kidney function, serum electrolyte pattern and as to macro-and microhistological appearances. The results were considered superior to those obtained by simple ureterosigmoidostomy as shown by control groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Althausen AF, Hagen-Cook K, Hendren WH (1978) Non refluxing colon conduit: Experience with 70 cases. J Urol 120:35

    Google Scholar 

  2. Altwein JE, Hohenfellner R (1975) Use of the colon as a conduit for urinary diversion. Surg Gynecol Obstet 140:33

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bergenhem B (1895) Ec topia vesicae et adenoma destruens vesiae; exstirpation af blasan; implantation af ureterena i rectum. Eira 19:268

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bricker EM (1950) Symposium on clinical surgery; bladder substitution after pelvic evisceration. Surg Clin North Am 30:1511

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chiari R, Euler J, Figdor P, Krenn J, Steinbereiter, K (1973) Erfolgreiche Behandlung einer schweren hypokaliämischen Lähmung mit Ateminsuffizienz bei Ureterosigmoideostomie. Anaesthesist 22:280

    Google Scholar 

  6. Coffey RC (1911) Physiologic implantation of the severed ureter or common bile duct into the intestine. JAMA 56:397

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cordonnier JJ (1955) Urinary diversion. Arch Surg 71:818

    Google Scholar 

  8. Crissey MM, Steele GD, Gittes RF (1980) Rat model for carcinogenesis in Ureterosigmoideostomy. Science 207:1079

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dows BJ, Velasco C (1964) Urologic uses of small and large intestine. Surg Clin North Am 44:849

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dunn M, Roberts JB, Smith JB, Slade N (1979) The long term results of ileal conduit urinary diversion in children. Br J Urol 51:458

    Google Scholar 

  11. Elder DD, Moisey CU, Rees (1979) A long term folow up of the colonic conduit operation in children. Br J Urol 51:462

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ferris DO, Odel HM (1950) Electrolyte pattern of the blood after bilateral ureterosigmoidostomy. JAMA 142:634

    Google Scholar 

  13. Garner JW, Goldstein AM, Cosgrove MD (1975) Histologic appearance of the intestinal urinary conduit. J Urol 114:854

    Google Scholar 

  14. Goodwin WE (1977) Undiversion: A technique: Ureteroileo recto-sigmoid bladder, with sigmoid colon anastomosed to rectum. Urologist Correspondence Club 9

  15. Goodwin WE, Harris AP, Kaufman JJ, Beal JM (1953) Open transcolonic ureterointestinal anastomosis; a new approach. Surg Gynecol Obstet 97:295

    Google Scholar 

  16. Goodwin WE, Scardino PT (1977) Ureterosigmoidostomy. J Urol 118:880

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hendren WH (1976) Exstrophy of the bladder — an alternative method of management. J Urol 115:195

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jeweth HJ (1940) Uretero-intestinal implantation: preliminary report. J Urol 44:223

    Google Scholar 

  19. Leadbetter WF, Clarce BG (1951) Uretero-enterostomy: report of technique. J Urol 65:818

    Google Scholar 

  20. Maydl K (1894) Über die Radikaltherapie der Ectopia vesicae urinae. Wien Med Wochenschr 44:1113

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mogg RA (1976) The sigmoid conduit. In: Glenn JF, Boyce WH (eds) Urological surgery, 2nd ed. Harper and Row, Hagerstone, Maryland, p 833

    Google Scholar 

  22. Moors DE, Collins WE, Vogelfänger I, Chiricosta A, Oxley M (1973) An intestinal valve in urinary diversion. J Urol 109:824

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mortensen E, Lyng G, Juhl E (1972) Ammonia induced coma after ureterosigmoidostomy. Lancet Feb 26:496

    Google Scholar 

  24. Novak R (1981) Antireflux ureteroileosigmoidostomy by means of ileal intussusception. Eur Urol 7:118

    Google Scholar 

  25. Nesbit RM (1961) Another hopeful look at ureterosigmoid anastomosis. J Urol 84:691

    Google Scholar 

  26. Orr JD, Shand EG, Watters AK, Kirland IS (1981) Ileal conduit urinary diversion in children: An assesment of long-term results. Br J Urol 53:424

    Google Scholar 

  27. Pinck BD (1969) Ureteroileosigmoidostomy: J Urol 102:37

    Google Scholar 

  28. Rabinovitch HH (1980) Ureterosigmoidostomy in children-Revival or remise. J Urol 124:552

    Google Scholar 

  29. Reinhardt W, Oliveux A, Fabre M, Bollack C (1978) Ultrastructural changes of the intestinal wall after transileal cutaneous ureterostomy in men. Eur Urol 4:195

    Google Scholar 

  30. Richie JP, Skinner DG (1975) Urinary diversion: the physiologic rationale for non refluxing colonic conduits. Br J Urol 269

  31. Richie JP, Skinner DG, Waisman J (1974) The effect of reflux on the development of pyelonephritis in urinary diversion. An experimental study. J Surg Res 16:256

    Google Scholar 

  32. Rosenberg ML (1953) The physiology of hyperchloremic acidosis following ureterosigmoidostomy: A study of urinary reabsorbtion with radioactive isotopes. J Urol 70:569

    Google Scholar 

  33. Simon J (1852) Ectopia vesicae: operation for directing the orifices of ureters into the rectum: temporary success, subsequent death: autopsy. Lancet 2:568

    Google Scholar 

  34. Spence HM, Hoffmann WW, Fosmire GP (1979) Tumor or the colon as a late complication of ureterosigmoidostomy for exstrophy of the bladder. Br J Urol 51:466

    Google Scholar 

  35. Stevens PS, Eckstein HB (1977) Ileal conduit urinary diversion in children. Br J Urol 49:379

    Google Scholar 

  36. Straub E, Hohenfellner R (1977) Beobachtungen an Kindern mit Blasenekstrophie nach Harnumleitungsoperation. Monatsschr Kinderheilkd 125:337

    Google Scholar 

  37. Thompson M (1973) Long tunnel ureterosigmoidostomy. J Urol 109:371

    Google Scholar 

  38. Turner RD, Goodwin WE (1959) Experiments with intussuscepted ileal valve in ureteral substitution. J Urol 81:526

    Google Scholar 

  39. Turnbull RB, Higgins CC (1957) Ileal valve pouch for urinary tract diversion. (Preliminary reports of eight cases), Cleveland Clinic Quarterly 24:187

    Google Scholar 

  40. Weyrauch HM, Young BW (1952) Evaluation of common methods of uretero-intestinal anastomoses: an experimental study. J Urol 67:880

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Urology and Experimental Surgery at the Department of Surgery in conjunction with the Institute of Cell Research and Oncology, University Medical School of Graz, Austria

    P. H. Petritsch, H. Gnad, P. Vilits & G. Suppan

  2. Department Urologie, Chirurgische Universitäts-Klinik, Auenbruggerplatz, A-8036, Graz, Austria

    P. H. Petritsch

Authors
  1. P. H. Petritsch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. H. Gnad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. P. Vilits
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. G. Suppan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Petritsch, P.H., Gnad, H., Vilits, P. et al. Evaluation of ileum interposition in ureterosigmoidostomy: Experimental studies. Urol. Res. 11, 23–28 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00272705

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00272705

Key words

Search

Navigation