Abstract
Much has been said about the pressure boundary condition for the projection method, which is different from the actual boundary condition satisfied by the pressure in the Navier-Stokes equations. In this short note we present a different point of view which resolves the difficulty and we show how this point of view agrees with previous results.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J. Bell, P. Colella, and H. Glaz (1989).
A.J. Chorin (1967), Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., 73, 928–931.
A.J. Chorin (1968a), Math. Comp., 22, 745–762.
A.J. Chorin (1968b), Stud. Numer. Anal., 2, 64–71.
A.J. Chorin (1969), Math. Comp., 23, 341–353.
M. Fortin, R. Peyret, and R. Temam (1971), J. Méc., 10, 357–390.
P.M. Gresho and S.T. Chan (1990), Internat. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 11, 621–659.
J. Kim and P. Moin (1985), J. Comp. Phys., 59, 308–323.
S.A. Orszag, M. Israeli, and M. Deville (1986), J. Sci. Comp., 1.
J. Shen (1991), An optimal error estimate of the projection method for the Navier-Stokes equations: First-order schemes, Preprint, Institute for Applied Mathematics and Scientific Computating, Indiana University. To appear in SIAM J. Numer. Anal.
R. Temam (1966), C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. A, 262, 219–221; 263, 241–244, 265–267, 459–462.
R. Temam (1968a), Bull. Soc. Math. France, 98, 115–152.
R. Temam (1968b), Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. (4), LXXIV, 191–380.
R. Temam (1969a), Arch. Rational Mech. Anal., 32, 135–153.
R. Temam (1969b), Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 33, 377–385.
R. Temam (1977), Navier-Stokes Equations, North-Holland, Amsterdam.
J. Van Kan (1986), SIAM J. Sci. Statist. Comput., 7, 870–891.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Communicated by M.Y. Hussaini
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Temam, R. Remark on the pressure boundary condition for the projection method. Theoret. Comput. Fluid Dynamics 3, 181–184 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00271801
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00271801