Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Classification and management of the slit ventricle syndrome

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A total of 32 patients with overdrainage of CSF, fulfilling the radiological and clinical criteria for collapsed ventricles (“slit ventricles”), were classified into acute, subacute and chronic forms. The basis of classification into these categories was neurologic symptomatology. The majority (29 patients) originally had a ventriculoatrial shunt and 3 had ventriculoperitoneal shunts. Operative correction was performed in 23 patients (insertion of a high pressure valve in 18 and an antisiphon device in 5). Of these, 5 had acute, 10 subacute, and 6 chronic symptoms. Two patients without symptoms were operated on also. During the follow-up period, which varied from 2 to 11 months, no patient has shown recurrence of the original symptoms of the slit ventricle syndrome; two patients developed subacute signs and an antisiphon device was inserted in addition to the high-resistance valve. On the basis of this series, it is concluded that the slit ventricle syndrome can also develop in patients with an atrioventricular shunt and can be treated by preventing further overdrainage of CSF. Though the results are acceptable by present methods, the need for a servo-regulated shunt persists. The surgical correction should preferably be performed before the acute phase. A flowchart is presented for management of a child with suspected slit ventricles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bradley KC (1970) Cerebrospinal fluid pressure. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 33:387–397

    Google Scholar 

  2. Collman H, Mauersberga W, Mohr G (1979) Clinical observations and CSF absorption studies in the slit ventricle syndrome. Lecture, Neurochirurgische Jahrestagung, Essen (FRG) 1979

  3. Epstein FJ, Fleischer AS, Hochwald GM, Ransohoff I (1974) Subtemporal craniectomy for recurrent shunt obstructions secondary to small ventricles. J Neurosurg 41:29–31

    Google Scholar 

  4. Faulhauer K, Schmitz P (1978) Over drainage phenomena in shunt treated hydrocephalus. Acta Neurochir 45:89–101

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fox JL, McCullough DC, Green RC (1973) Effect of CSF shunts on intracranial pressure and CSF dynamics. II. A new technique of pressure measurement, result and concept. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 36:302–312

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gruber R (1983) Should “normalization” of the ventricles be the goal of hydrocephalus therapy? Z Kinderchir [Suppl 2] 38:80–83

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hakim S (1973) Hydraulic and mechanical miss-matching of valve shunts used in the treatment of hydrocephalus: the need for a servo-valve shunt. Dev Med Child Neurol 15:646–653

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hirayama H (1982) Slit ventricle — a reluctant goal of ventriculoperitoneal shunt. Monogr Neural Sci 8:108–111

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hoffman HJ (1982) Technical problems in shunts. Monogr Neural Sci 8:158–169

    Google Scholar 

  10. Holness RO, Hoffman HJ, Hendrich EB (1979) Subtemporal decompression for the slit ventricle syndrome after shunt in hydrocephalic children. Child's Brain 5:137–144

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hyde-Brown MD, Rekate HL, Nulsen FE (1981) Re-expansion of previously collapsed ventricles: the slit ventricle syndrome. J Neurosurg 56:536–539

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kiekens R, Mortier W, Pothman R, Bock WJ, Seibert H (1982) The slit ventricle syndrome after shunting in hydrocephalic children. Neuropaediatrie 13:190–194

    Google Scholar 

  13. Loman J (1934) Components of cerebrospinal fluid pressure affected by changes in pressure. Arch Neurol Psychiatry 31:679–681

    Google Scholar 

  14. McCullough DC, Fox JZ (1974) Negative intracranial pressure hydrocephalus in adults with shunts and its relationship to prediction and subdural teratoma. J Neurosurg 40:372–375

    Google Scholar 

  15. McCullough DC, Wells M (1983) Complications with antisiphon device in hydrocephalus with ventriculoperitoneal shunts. Concepts Paediatr Surg 2:63–75

    Google Scholar 

  16. Naidich TP, Epstein F, Lin JP, Kricheff II, Hochwald GM (1976) Evaluation of paediatric hydrocephalus by computed tomography. Radiology 119:337–345

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nulsen FE, Rekate HL (1979) Results of treatment for hydrocephalus as a guide to future management. In: Section of pediatric neurosurgery of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons (ed) Pediatric neurosurgery. Grune & Stratton, New York, pp 229–241

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nulsen FE, Spitz ED (1952) Treatment of hydrocephalus by direct shunt from ventricle to jugular vein. Surg Forum 2:399–403

    Google Scholar 

  19. Portnoy HD, Schulte RD, Fox JL, Croissant PD, Tripp L (1973) Antisiphon and reversible valves for shunting preventing post-shunt subdural haematomas. J Neurosurg 38:729–738

    Google Scholar 

  20. Salmon JH (1978) The collapsed ventricle: management and prevention. Surg Neurol 9:349–352

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shucart WA, Conolly R (1975) Experimental negative intraventricular pressures. J Surg Res 19:43–46

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yamada H, Masataka T, Mashiro N (1975) Effect of respiratory movement on cerebrospinal fluid dynamics in hydrocephalic infants with shunt. J Neurosurg 42:194–200

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Serlo, W., Heikkinen, E., Saukkonen, AL. et al. Classification and management of the slit ventricle syndrome. Child's Nerv Syst 1, 194–199 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00270761

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00270761

Key words

Navigation