Skip to main content
Log in

Adaptation of ocular vergence to stimulation with large disparities

  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Ocular vergence movements were measured with a scleral coil technique under stabilized viewing conditions for disparity. Crossed disparity steps, ranging between 0.25 and 10 deg, of three different targets were imposed. Ocular vergence responses consisted of converging movements with an initially constant velocity. This velocity increased with the magnitude of disparity up to about 4 deg and decreased for larger disparities. For disparities up to 2 deg the responses saturated at the limit of convergence. For larger disparities responses were transient, i.e. after large converging movements the angle of convergence gradually declined to about its initial value. For disparities larger than 5 deg amplitudes of the transient responses decreased and occasionally responses were completely absent. The transient character of responses was apparently due to adaptation of the vergence system to a specific disparity, since responses to different disparities could still be induced. Probing of the vergence system with two successive disparity steps of different magnitudes showed that adaptation was selective for a limited range of disparities around the adapting disparity stimulus. Stabilized disparity pulses with durations ranging from 100 to 800 ms induced ocular vergence movements following the time integral of disparity rather than momentary disparity. This indicated that the part of the vergence system sensitive to disparity has mainly integrative properties for large as well as small disparities. Stimulation with trains of shortlasting disparity pulses showed that adaptation also occurred under normal viewing conditions. They further revealed that adaptation is erased during a short period after each blink.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barlow HB, Blakemore C, Pettigrew JD (1967) The neural mechanisms of binocular depth discrimination. J Physiol 193: 327–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Cumming BG, Judge SJ (1986) Disparity-induced and blur-induced convergence eye movement and accomodation in the monkey during dichoptic viewing of moving random-dot stereograms. J Neurophysiol 55: 896–914

    Google Scholar 

  • Collewijn H, Van der Mark F, Jansen TC (1975) Precise recording of human eye movements. Vision Res 15: 447–450

    Google Scholar 

  • Erkelens CJ, Collewijn H (1985a) Eye movements in relation to loss and regaining of fusion of disjunctively moving random-dot stereograms. Human Neurobiol 4: 181–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Erkelens CJ, Collewijn H (1985b) Eye movements and stereopsis during dichoptic viewing of moving random-dot stereograms. Vision Res 25: 1689–1700

    Google Scholar 

  • Erkelens CJ, Collewijn H (1985c) Motion perception during dichoptic viewing of moving random-dot stereograms. Vision Res 25: 583–588

    Google Scholar 

  • Erkelens CJ, Regan D (1986) Human ocular vergence movements induced by changing size and disparity. J Physiol 379: 145–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Fender D, Julesz B (1967) Extension of Panum's fusional area in binocularly stabilized vision. JOSA 57: 819–830

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyson MT, Julesz B, Fender D (1983) Eye movements and neural remapping during fusion of misaligned random-dot stereograms. JOSA 73: 1665–1673

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones R, Kerr KW (1971) Motor responses to conflicting asymmetrical vergence stimulus information. Am J Optom 48: 989–1000

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones R (1980) Fusional vergence: sustained and transient components. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 57: 640–644

    Google Scholar 

  • Julesz B (1978) Global stereopsis: cooperative phenomena in stereoscopic depth perception. In: Held R, Leibowitz HW, Teuber H-L (eds) Handbook of sensory physiology. Vol VIII. Springer, Berlin, pp 215–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishnan VV, Stark L (1977) A heuristic model for human vergence eye movement system. IEEE Trans Biomed Electr BME-24: 44–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddox EE (1893) The clinical use of prisms, 2nd ed. John Wright Sons, Bristol

    Google Scholar 

  • Marr D (1982) Stereopsis. In: Vision, Chap 3.3. WH Freeman, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell DE (1970) Properties of stimuli eliciting vergence eye movements and stereopsis. Vision Res 10: 145–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Poggio GF, Fischer B (1977) Binocular interaction and depth sensitivity in striate and prestriate cortex of behaving rhesus monkey. J Neurophysiol 40: 1392–1405

    Google Scholar 

  • Poggio GF, Poggio T (1984) The analysis of stereopsis. Ann Rev Neurosci 7: 379–412

    Google Scholar 

  • Rashbass C, Westheimer G (1961) Disjunctive eye movements. J Physiol 159: 339–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Rashbass C (1981) Reflexions on the control of vergence. In: Zuber BL (ed) Models of oculomotor behavior and control. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 139–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Regan D, Erkelens CJ, Collewijn H (1986) Necessary conditions for motion in depth perception. Inv Ophthalmol Vis Sci 27: 584–597

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards W (1971) Anomalous stereoscopic depth perception. JOSA 61: 410–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Riggs LA, Niehl EW (1960) Eye movements recorded during convergence and divergence. JOSA 50: 913–920

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson DA (1963) A method of measuring eye movement using a scleral coil in a magnetic field. IEEE Trans Biomed Electr BME 10: 137–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Semmlow JL, Hung GK, Ciuffreda KJ (1986) Quantitative assessment of disparity vergence components. Inv Ophthalmol Vis Sci 27: 558–564

    Google Scholar 

  • Westheimer G (1979) Cooperative neural processes involved in stereoscopic acuity. Exp Brain Res 36: 585–597

    Google Scholar 

  • Westheimer G, Mitchell DE (1956) Eye movement responses to convergence stimuli. Arch Ophthalmol 55: 848–856

    Google Scholar 

  • Westheimer G, Mitchell DE (1969) The sensory stimulus for disjunctive eye movements. Vision Res 9: 749–755

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuber BL, Stark L (1968) Dynamic characteristics of the fusional vergence eye-movement system. IEEE Trans Syst Sci Cybern SSC-4: 72–79

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Erkelens, C.J. Adaptation of ocular vergence to stimulation with large disparities. Exp Brain Res 66, 507–516 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00270683

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00270683

Key words

Navigation