Abstract
Cell suspension cultures of Carica papaya were found to produce a papain-like enzyme showing an amidase activity similar to papain. Experiments suggested that the enzyme was an SH-enzyme, but an immunological test indicated the absence of papain in cultured cells. The isoelectric point (4.3) of the enzyme of cultured cells was the same as that of the leaf extract, but was different from that of papain or other amidases in the latex of the fruit.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arnon R (1970) Methods in Enzymology 19: 226–244
Bradford MM (1976) Anal. Biochem. 72: 248–254
Furuya T, Ikuta A, Syono K (1972) Phytochemistry 11: 3041–3044
Krikorian, AD (1965) The synthetic potentialities of cultured plant cells and tissues, Ph. D. Thesis. Cornell University, Ithaca, N. Y.
Kutchan TM, Ayabe S, Krueger RJ, Coscia EM, Coscia CJ (1983) Plant Cell Reports 2: 281–284
Linsmaier EM, Skoog F (1965) Physiol. Plant. 18: 100–127
Medora RS, Campbell JM, Mell GP (1973) Lloydia 36: 214–216
Medora RS, Mell GP, Bilderback DE (1984) Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 114: 179–185
Mell GP, Medora RS, Bilderback DE (1979) Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 91: 279–282
Ouchterlony O, Nilsson LA (1967) in ‘Handbook of Experimental Immunology’ Vol. 1 Immunochemistry (Weir DM ed.) 2nd ed.: 19.1–19.39 Blackwell, London
Rush MD, Kutchan TM, Coscia CJ (1985) Plant Cell Reports 4: 237–240
Shapira E, Arnon R (1969) J. Biol. Chem. 244: 1026–1032
Sluyterman LAE (1967) Biochem. Biophys. Acta 139: 430–438
Suda H, Aoyagi T, Hamada M, Takeuchi T, Umezawa H (1972) J. Antibiotics 25: 263–266
Tam WHJ, Constabel F, Kurz WGW (1980) Phytochemistry 19: 486–487
Tsukada M, Tabata M (1984) Planta Medica 51: 338–341
Whitaker JR, Perez-Villasenor J (1968) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 124: 70–78
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Communicated by F. Constabel
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yamamoto, H., Tanaka, S., Fukui, H. et al. Enzymatic difference between laticifers and cultured cells of papaya. Plant Cell Reports 5, 269–272 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00269819
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00269819