Skip to main content
Log in

Karyotype variation in aminoethylcysteine resistant cell and callus cultures and regenerated plants of a dihaploid potato (Solanum tuberosum)

  • Published:
Plant Cell Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Karyotypic studies on cell suspensions and calli of an S-(2-aminoethyl)cysteine resistant cell line of the interdihaploid potato H2578 (2n=24) revealed a high degree of variation in the number of chromosomes (33–217) and dicentric chromosomes (0–8). The suspensions also exhibited megachromosomes and fused chromosomes. Differential staining showed that in suspensions dicentrics survived mitotic cycles mainly by parallel separation of the chromatids during anaphase and hardly by the breakage-fusion-bridge cycle. Two phenotypes of plantlets regenerated, each with 34 or 35 chromosomes with gross structural mutations and with the triploid amount of DNA. Chromosomal variation was related to the degree of tissue organization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bokelmann GS, Roest S (1983) Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 109: 259–265

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewen JG, Peacock WJ (1969) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 62: 389–394

    Google Scholar 

  • Browers MA, Orton TJ (1982) J. Hered. 73: 159–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns JA, Gerstel DU (1973) Genetics 75: 497–502

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrano AV, Heddle JA (1973) J. Theor. Biol. 38: 289–304

    Google Scholar 

  • D'Amato F (1985) CRC Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 3: 73–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Doležel J, Novák FJ (1986) Plant Cell Reports 5: 280–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans DA, Gamborg OL (1982) Plant Cell Reports 1: 104–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Fish N, Karp A (1986) Theor. Appl. Genet. 72: 405–412

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill BS, Kam-Morgan LNW, Shepard JF (1987) J. Hered. 78: 15–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Harms CT, Potrykus I, Widholm JM (1981) Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 101: 377–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen E (1986) J. Plant Physiol. 123: 307–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Kao KN, Miller RA, Gamborg OL, Harvey BL (1970) Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 12: 297–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Karp A, Bright WJ (1985) Oxford Surveys Plant Mol. Cell Biol. 2: 199–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovács EI (1985) Theor. Appl. Genet. 70: 548–554

    Google Scholar 

  • Murata M, Orton TJ (1984) Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 26: 395–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouras A (1984) Differentiation 27: 88–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Pijnacker LP, Ferwerda MA (1984) Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 26: 415–419

    Google Scholar 

  • Pijnacker LP, Hermelink JHM, Ferwerda MA (1986)a Plant Cell Reports 5: 43–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Pijnacker LP, Walch K, Ferwerda MA (1986)b Theor. Appl. Genet. 72: 833–839

    Google Scholar 

  • Sree Ramulu K (1986) In: Vasil IK (ed) Cell culture and somatic cell genetics of plants 3: 449–473

    Google Scholar 

  • Sree Ramulu K, Dijkhuis P, Hänisch ten Cate ChH, Groot B de (1985) Plant Science 41: 69–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumner AT (1972) Exp. Cell Res. 75: 304–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunderland N (1977) In: Street HE (ed) Plant tissue and cell culture, Blackwell Sci. Publ., Oxford, pp. 177–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Tempelaar MJ (1980) Chromosoma 77: 359–371

    Google Scholar 

  • Toncelli F, Martini G, Giovinazzo G, Nuti Ronchi V (1985) Theor. Appl. Genet. 70: 345–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Vries SE de, Bokelmann GS (1986) J. Plant Physiol. 122: 199–203

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by I. Potrykus

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pijnacker, L.P., Ferwerda, M.A. Karyotype variation in aminoethylcysteine resistant cell and callus cultures and regenerated plants of a dihaploid potato (Solanum tuberosum). Plant Cell Reports 6, 385–388 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00269568

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00269568

Keywords

Navigation