Skip to main content
Log in

Factors affecting protoplast electrofusion efficiency

  • Published:
Plant Cell Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The electrofusion efficiency of protoplasts isolated from a carrot (Daucus carota) suspension culture was increased by treatment with 0.1 mg/ml lysolecithin, 2.5% dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), or 0.5 mM Ca2+. The lysolecithin and DMSO treatments substantially increased protoplast lysis, whereas calcium treatment did not. The enzymes used for protoplast isolation were also found to have a dramatic effect on the efficiency of fusion. A mixture of Cellulysin and Driselase led to a two-fold enhancement of fusion as compared with Driselase alone. The stimulation by Cellulysin appears to be due to enzymatic modification of the cell surface. However, comparison of the time course for wall digestion with the development of susceptibility to electrofusion suggests that the effect of Cellulysin is not simply due to removal of the cell wall. Brief treatment of the cells with pronase or proteinase K also doubled the efficiency of fusion. Taken together, these results indicate that electrofusion efficiency can be enhanced by the method used for protoplast isolation; they also suggest that modification of membrane/cell-surface proteins during protoplast isolation may be particularly important in determining electrofusion efficiencies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

a.c.:

alternating current

d.c.:

direct current

DMSO:

dimethylsulfoxide

NAA:

naphthaleneacetic acid

PEG:

polyethylene glycol

References

  • Bates GW, Nea LJ, Hasenkampf, CA (1987) In: Sowers AE (ed) Cell Fusion, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 479–496

    Google Scholar 

  • Constabel F, Kao KN (1974) Can J Bot 52:1603–1606

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson, T (1965) Physiol Plant 18:976–993

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleba YY, Sytnik KM (1984) Protoplast Fusion, Genetic Engineering in Higher Plants. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Honda K, Maeda Y, Sasakawa S, Ohno H, Tsuchida E (1981) Biochem Biophys Res Comm 101:165–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Kameya T (1979) Cytologia 44:449–456

    Google Scholar 

  • Kao KN (1981) In: Han H (ed) Plant Tissue Culture, Proceedings of the Beijing Symp, Pitman International Series in Applied Biology, Pitman, London, pp 331–339

    Google Scholar 

  • Menczel L, Wolfe K (1984) Pl Cell Reports 3:196–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruzin SE, McCarthy SC (1986) Pl Cell Reports 5:342–345

    Google Scholar 

  • Senda M, Takeda J, Abe S, Nakamura T (1979) Plant Cell Physiol 20:1441–1443

    Google Scholar 

  • Spangenberg G, Schweiger H-G (1986) Eur J Cell Biol 41:51–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Tempelaar MJ, Jones MGK (1985) Planta 165:205–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Tempelaar MJ, Duyst A, DeVlas Sy, Krol G, Symmonds C, Jones MGK (1987) Plant Sci 48:99–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasil IK, Vasil V (1980) Int Rev Cytol, Suppl 11B:1–17

  • Watts JW, King JM (1984) Biosc Rep 4:335–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann U (1982) Biochim Biophys Acta 694:227–277

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by E. D. Earle

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nea, L.J., Bates, G.W. Factors affecting protoplast electrofusion efficiency. Plant Cell Reports 6, 337–340 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00269554

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00269554

Keywords

Navigation