Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Posterior intertransverse fusion assessed clinically and with biplanar radiography

  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Biplanar radiography was used to assess bony union after intertransverse fusion. The patients were assessed clinically and the fusion status was compared with the clinical result.

Posterolateral intertransverse fusion was shown to be capable of fusing the motion segment almost completely. However, the strictly measured fusion rate was only 27%, but this increased to 91% when partial fusions were included. The fusion rate from conventional plain films assessed by the radiologist was 82%, which is similar to other reports. On clinical examination, a satisfactory result was obtained in 82%, but there was no clear correlation with fusion status.

Résumé

On a pratiqué des radiographies däns deux plans perpendiculaires afin d'estimer la fusion osseuse après arthrodèse inter-transversaire. Les patients sont examinés cliniquement et l'état radiologique est comparé au résultat clinique. On sait que l'arthrodèse postéro-latérale inter-transversaire est capable de fusionner presque complètement le segment mobile du rachis. Cependant, le pourcentage de fusion rigoureusement certaine n'est que de 27%, mais il atteint 91% si l'on y ajoute les fusions partielles. Le pourcentage de fusion estimé par le radiologue sur des clichés conventionnels est de 82%, ce qui est identique aux autres séries publiées. Du point de vue clinique, le résultat est satisfaisant dans 82% des cas, mais sans corrélation exacte avec l'état radiologique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adkins EWO (1955) Spondylolisthesis. J Bone Joint Surg 37B: 48–62

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chung SMK (1971) Methods for locating the “missing patients” in longterm follow up studies. J Bone Joint Surg 53A: 1448–1451

    Google Scholar 

  3. DePalma A, Rothman K (1968) The nature of pseudarthrosis. Clin Orthop 59: 113–118

    Google Scholar 

  4. Finneson BE (1973) Low Back Pain. JB Lippincott and Co., Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hoover NW (1968) Methods of lumbar fusion. J Bone Joint Surg 50A: 194–210

    Google Scholar 

  6. Meyerding HW (1941) Low backache and sciatic pain associated with spondylolisthesis and protruding intervertebral disc. Incidence, significance and treatment. J Bone Joint Surg 23: 461–470

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nelson MA (1965) Anterior fusion of the lumbar spine, review of 24 patients. Proc R Soc Med 58: 381–383

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pearcy MJ, Whittle MW (1982) Movements of the lumbar spine measured by three-dimensional X-ray analysis. J Biomed Eng 4: 107–112

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pearcy MJ, Burrough SJ (1982) Assessment of bony union after interbody fusion of the lumbar spine using a biplanar radiographic technique. J Bone Joint Surg 645B: 228–232

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pearcy MJ, Portek I, Shepherd J (1984) Three-dimensional X-ray analysis of normal movement in the lumbar spine. Spine 9: 294–297

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pearcy MJ, Shepherd J (1985) Is there instability in spondylolisthesis? Spine 10: 175–177

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rolander SD (1966) Motion of the lumbar spine with special reference to the stabilizing effect of posterior fusion. An experimental study on autopsy specimens. Acta Orthop Scand Supplement 90

  13. Shaw EG, Taylor JG (1956) The results of lumbo-sacral fusion for low back pain. J Bone Joint Surg 38B: 485

    Google Scholar 

  14. Stauffer RN, Coventry MB (1972) Posterolateral lumbar spine fusion. J Bone Joint Surg 54A: 1195–1204

    Google Scholar 

  15. Stokes IAF, Wilder DG, Frymoyer JW, Pope MH (1981) Assessment of patients with low back pain by biplanar radiographic measurement of intervertebral motion. Spine 6: 223–240

    Google Scholar 

  16. Taylor TKF (1970) Anterior interbody fusion in the management of disorders of the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg 52B: 784

    Google Scholar 

  17. Truchley G, Thompson WAL (1962) Posterolateral fusion of the lumbosacral spine. J Bone Joint Surg 44A: 505–512

    Google Scholar 

  18. Watkins MB (1953) Posterolateral fusion of the lumbar and lumbo-sacral spine. J Bone Joint Surg 35A: 1014–1019

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wilkinson MA (1983) The failed back syndrome. Harper and Row, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wiltse LL, Bateman JG, Hutchinson RH, Nelson W (1968) The paraspinal sacro-spinalis splitting approach to the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg 50A: 919–926

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wiltse LL, Newman PH, MacNab I (1976) Classification of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. Clin Orthop 117: 23–29

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

T. Suzuki MD was the 1983 Joseph Trueta Travelling Fellow from the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tohoku University 1-1, Seiryo machi, Sendai 980, Japan

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Suzuki, T., Pearcy, M.J., Tibrewal, S.B. et al. Posterior intertransverse fusion assessed clinically and with biplanar radiography. International Orthopaedics 9, 11–17 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00267032

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00267032

Key words

Navigation