Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Segmental bone grafting

Comparison of different types of graft in dogs

  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

We have compared the biological behaviour of eight types of segmental tibial grafts in dogs under different immunological conditions: autografts, allografts, allografts with short-term immunosuppression (4 weeks), and allografts with longterm suppression (20 weeks). Some grafts were revascularised by microsurgical anastomosis, others were not. The long-term immunosuppressed allografts are most similar to autografts in terms of perfusion pattern and graft-host interface healing. The difference between long-term immunosuppressed allografts and allografts which were not immunosuppressed was highly significant (P<0.01). The viability of long-term immunosuppressed allografts, as measured by fluorochrome-labelled osteons, did not reach the level of the autografts, but still differed significantly from the allografts which were not immunosuppressed. Immunosuppression, therefore, improves the survival and the quality of the graft, more so for long-term immunosuppressed grafts, and also in revascularised grafts.

Résumé

Nous avons comparé, chez le chien, le comportement biologique de huit types de greffes segmentaires de tibia dans diverses conditions immunologiques : autogreffes, allogreffes, allogreffes avec courte immunosuppression (4 semaines), et allogreffes avec longue immunosuppression (20 semaines). Certaines greffes étaient revascularisées par anastomose micro-chirurgicale, d'autres ne l'étaient pas. Les allogreffes avec longue immunosuppression se sont révélées les plus semblables aux autogreffes sur le plan de la vascularisation et de l'évolution de l'interface hôte-greffon. La différence entre les allogreffes simples et celles avec longue immuno-suppression est hautement significative (P<0,01). La viabilité des allogreffes avec longue im muno-suppression, mesurée par les ostéons marqués au fluorochrome, n'a pas atteint le niveau des autogreffes, mais elle diffère significativement des allogreffes sans immunosuppression. En conclusion, l'immuno-suppression améliore la survie et la qualité des greffes, d'autant plus qu'elle est prolongée, de même que la revascularisation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arat MA, Wood MB, Cooney WP (1984) Revascularized segmental diaphyseal bone transfers in the canine. J Reconstr Microsurg 1: 11–19

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bos GD, Goldberg VM, Powel AE, Heiple KG, Zika JM (1983) The effect of histocompatibility matching on canine frozen bone allografts. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 65: 89–96

    Google Scholar 

  3. Burchardt H, Enneking WF (1978) Transplantation of bone. Surg Clin North Am 58: 403–426

    Google Scholar 

  4. Burchardt H, Glowczewskie FP, Enneking WF (1981) Short-term immunosuppression with fresh segmental fibular allografts in dogs. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 63: 411–415

    Google Scholar 

  5. Burwell RG (1985) The function of bone marrow in the incorporation of a bone graft. Clin Orthop Rel Res 200: 125–141

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cummine J, Armstrong L, Nade S (1983) Osteogenesis after bone and bone marrow transplantation. Acta Orthop Scand 54: 235–241

    Google Scholar 

  7. Czitrom AA, Langer F, McKee N, Gross AE (1986) Bone and cartilage allotransplantation. Clin Orthop 208: 141–145

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dambe LW, Sauer K, Schweiberer L (1978) Revaskularisation frischer homologer Knochentransplantate in der Diaphyse des Röhrenknochens beim Hund. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 92: 35–45

    Google Scholar 

  9. Danckwardt-Lillieström G, Lorenzi GL, Olerud S (1970) Intramedullary nailing after reaming. Acta Orthop Scand [Suppl] 134

  10. Dell PC, Burchardt H, Glowczewskie F (1985) Roentgenographic, biomechanicanical and histological evaluation of vascularized and nonvascularized segmental fibular canine autografts. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 67: 105–112

    Google Scholar 

  11. Doi K, Tominage S, Shibata T (1977) Bone grafts with microvascular anastomoses of vascular pedicles. J Bone Joing Surg [Am] 59: 809–815

    Google Scholar 

  12. Elves MW (1980) Bone and cartilage grafting and organ transplantation. In: Owen R, Goodfellow J, Bullough P (eds) Scientific Foundations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology. Saunders, Philadelphia Toronto, pp 273–290

    Google Scholar 

  13. Friedlaender GE (1983) Immune responses to osteochondral allografts: current knowledge and future directions. Clin Orthop Res 174: 58–68

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fritz WD, Swartz WM, Rose S, Futrell JW, Klein E (1980) Limb allografts in rats immunosuppressed with Cyclosporin A. Ann Surg 199: 211–215

    Google Scholar 

  15. Goldberg VW, Bos GD, Heiple KG, Zika JM, Powell AE (1984) Improved acceptance of frozen bone allografts in genetically mismatched dogs by immunosuppression. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 66: 937–950

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gunst MA, Suter C, Rahn BA (1979) Die Knochendurchblutung nach Plattenosteosynthese. Helv Chir Acta 46: 171–175

    Google Scholar 

  17. Haw CS, O'Brien B McC, Kurata T (1978) The microsurgical revascularisation of resected segments of tibia in the dog. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 60: 266–269

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hutzschenreuter P, Allgöwer M, Borel JF, Perren SM (1973) Second-set reaction favouring incorporation of bone allografts. Experientia 29: 103–104

    Google Scholar 

  19. Innis PC, Randolph MA, Pashert JP, Burdick JF, Clow LW, Yaremchuk MJ, Weiland AJ (1987) Vascularized bone allografts: in vitro assessment of the cell-mediated and humeral response. Trans Orthop Res Soc 12: 116

    Google Scholar 

  20. Judet H, Padovani JP (1973) Transplantation d'articulation complète avec rétablissement circulatoire immédiate par anastomose artérielle et veineuse chez le chien. Rev Chir Orthop 59: 125–138

    Google Scholar 

  21. Klein L, Dollinger B, Goldberg VM, Zika JM, Powell AE, Heiple KG (1985) Effects on bone of vascular interruption. Acta Orthop Scand 56: 47–51

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lipson RA, Kawano H, Halloran PF, McKee NH, Pritzker KPH, Langer F (1983) Vascularized limb transplantation in the rat. I Results with syngeneic grafts. Transplantation 35: 293–299

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lipson RA, Kawano H, Halloran PF, Pritzker KPH, Kandel R, Langer F (1983) Vascularized limb transplantation in the rat. II Results with allogeneic grafts. Transplantation 35: 300–304

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lopez-Curto JA, Bassingthwaight JB, Kelly PJ (1980) Anatomy of the microvasculature of the tibial diaphysis of the adult dog. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 62: 1362–1369

    Google Scholar 

  25. McEwen W (1881) Observations concerning the transplantation of bone. Proc R Soc Lond 32: 232

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mankin HJ, Fogelson FS, Thrasher AZ, Jaffer F (1976) Massive resection and allograft replacement in the treatment of malignant bone tumors. N Engl J Med 294: 1247–1255

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mankin HJ, Doppelt S, Tomford W (1983) Clinical experience with allograft implantation. Clin Orthop 174: 69–86

    Google Scholar 

  28. Moore JR, Phillips TW, Weiland AJ, Randolph MA (1984) Allogenic transplants of bone revascularized by microvascular anastomoses: a preliminary study. J Orthop Res 1: 352–360

    Google Scholar 

  29. Nettelblad H, Yaremchuk MJ, Randolph MA, Weiland AJ (1984) The effect of genetic disparity on vascularized bone allograft survival in the rat. Trans Orthop Res Soc 9: 244

    Google Scholar 

  30. O'Brien BM, McLeod AM, Miller DH, Newly R, Hayhurst IW, Morrison WA (1973) Clinical replantation of digits. Plast Reconstr Surg 52: 490–502

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ollier L (1867) Traité expérimental et clinique de la régénération des os et de la production artificielle de tissu osseux. Masson, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ottolenghi CE (1972) Massive osteoarticular bone grafts: technique and results of 62 cases. Clin Orthop 87: 156–164

    Google Scholar 

  33. Parrish FF (1966) Treatment of bone tumors by total excision and replacement with massive autologous and homologous grafts. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 48: 968–990

    Google Scholar 

  34. Schenk RK (1986) Histophysiology of bone remodeling and bone repair. In: Lyn OCC, Chao EYS (eds) Perspectives on the Biomaterials. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 75–94

    Google Scholar 

  35. Schwarzenbach O, Aebi M, Swiontkowski MF (1986) Laser-Doppler flow metry (LDF) for evaluation of microvascular anastomoses in free vascular bone allografts. Trans Orthop Res Soc 11: 374–375

    Google Scholar 

  36. Shaffer JW, Field GA, Goldberg VM, Davy DT (1985) Fate of vascularized and nonvascularized autografts. Clin Orthop 197: 32–43

    Google Scholar 

  37. Siliski JM, Simpkin S, Green CJ (1984) Vascularized whole knee joint allografts in rabbits, immunosuppressed with Cyclosporin A. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 103: 26–35

    Google Scholar 

  38. Slome D, Reeves B (1966) Experimental homotransplantation of the knee-joint. Lancet 2: 205

    Google Scholar 

  39. Stewart JA, Langer F, Halloran P, Gross AE (1984) Vascularized bone and joint transplantation in the rat: the effect of antilymphocyte serum and Cyclosporin immunosuppression. Trans Orthop Res Soc 9: 266

    Google Scholar 

  40. Taylor GI (1977) Microvascular free bone transfer. Orthop Clin North Am 8: 225

    Google Scholar 

  41. Trias A, Fery A (1979) Cortical circulation of long bones. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 61: 1052–1059

    Google Scholar 

  42. Trueta J (1974) Blood supply and the rate of healing of tibial fractures. Clin Orthop 105: 11–26

    Google Scholar 

  43. Volkov M, Maliev AS (1976) Use of allogenous articular bone implants as substitutes for autotransplants in adult patients. Clin Orthop 114: 192–202

    Google Scholar 

  44. Warren SB, Friedlaender GE, Pelker RR, Panjabi M, Troiano N, McKay J (1984) The effects of Cyclosporin A on intact and fractured bone: a biomechanical perspective. Trans Orthop Res Soc 9: 302

    Google Scholar 

  45. Weiland AJ, Moore JR, Daniel RK (1983) Vascularized bone autografts. Clin Orthop 174: 87–95

    Google Scholar 

  46. White DJG (1983) Cyclosporin A: clinical applications and immunology. Clin Imm Allerg 3: 287–304

    Google Scholar 

  47. Whiteside LA, Ogata K, Lesker P, Reynolds FC (1978) The acute effects of periosteal stripping and medullary reaming on regional bone blood flow. Clin Orthop 131: 266–272

    Google Scholar 

  48. Yaremchuk MJ, Sedacca T, Schiller AL, May JW Jr (1983) Vascular knee allograft transplantation in a rabbit model. Plast Reconstr Surg 71: 461–471

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

SIROT-SICOT, Award, Munich, 1987

Supported by the Swiss National Foundation for Scientific Research, Grant 3-926-82; by an AO Research Grant and by Sandoz AG, Switzerland

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aebi, M., Regazzoni, P. & Schwarzenbach, O. Segmental bone grafting. International Orthopaedics 13, 101–111 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00266370

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00266370

Keywords

Navigation