Skip to main content
Log in

A large scale comparative study in general practice with nitroglycerin spray and tablet formulations in elderly patients with angina pectoris

  • Short Communications
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In an 8-week comparative study, 410 patients were treated with nitroglycerin spray and 387 with conventional 500 mcg sublingual tablets. Data were analysed to compare the two treatments and to compare the results in older patients (≥65y) with younger patients (<65 y).

Spray was significantly superior to tablets in terms of number of patients helped, speed of pain relief and reduction in the number of attacks from pre-study levels. The occurrence of headache was significantly less in the spray group. There was no significant difference in the number or nature of adverse events but more spray patients reported taste disturbance. The clinical advantages seen in the entire population were maintained when the two age categories were considered separately. Further, 95% of patients found the spray convenient.

The authors conclude that improved efficacy together with improved stability of the spray without loss of convenience makes Nitrolingual spray an acceptable alternative to tablets irrespective of patients' age.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Anon (1984) The Consumers' Assoc Drug and Therapeutics Bulletin 22

  2. VandenBurg MJ, Wight LJ, Griffiths GK, Brandman S (1986) Sublingual nitroglycerin or spray in the treatment of angina. BJ Clin Prac 40: 524–527

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kinichi A, Lee G, Amsterdam E, Fujii K, Krieg P, Mason DT (1983) Increased exercise tolerance after nitroglycerin oral spray: a new and effective therapeutic modality in angina pectoris. Circulation 67: 124–127

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lee G, Law R, Price J, Nguyen T, Mason DT (1980) Efficacy of nitrolingual spray. Clin Res 28: 191

    Google Scholar 

  5. O'Hanrahan M, McCarry K, Kelly JC, Horgan J, O'Malley K (1982) Diminished activity of glyceryl trinitrate. Br Med J 284: 1183–1184

    Google Scholar 

  6. Marty J, Shaw J, Hunt D (1983) The stability of glyceryl trinitrate tablets during patient use. Aust NZJ Med 284: 147–150

    Google Scholar 

  7. Flaherty JT, Reid PR, Kelly DT, Taylor DR, Weisfeldt ML, Pitt B (1975) Intravenous nitroglycerin in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 51: 132–139

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bussmann WD, Schudd D (1978) Effect of sublingual nitroglycerin in emergency treatment of severe pulmonary oedema. Am J Cardiol 41: 931–936

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wight, L.J., VandenBurg, M.J., Potter, C.E. et al. A large scale comparative study in general practice with nitroglycerin spray and tablet formulations in elderly patients with angina pectoris. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 42, 341–342 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00266360

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00266360

Key words

Navigation