Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Fractures involving the distal epiphyseal plate of the femur

  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Forty-two fractures involving the distal femoral epiphyseal plate in 41 patients were reviewed. The average age at injury was 11.2 years. The follow up period ranged from one year to 20.3 years, with an average of 6.3 years. The Salter-Harris classification of epiphyseal plate injuries proved to be a good indicator of the mechanism of injury and prognosis. Using stringent criteria to classify the end results, 2 out of 3 of the total group and 3 out of 4 of 29 Salter-Harris Type 1 and Type II injuries had good or excellent results. Type V crushing injuries of the growth plate, open injuries, fractures caused by high velocity motor vehicle accidents with severe displacement or multiple associated fractures, and incompletely reduced epiphyseal injuries gave only poor or fair results. Major problems responsible for poor or fair results were varus or valgus angulation, loss of joint motion and shortening due to premature epiphyseal closure. Orthoradiographs revealed the presence of some degree of shortening in 20 of 29 Salter-Harris Type I and Type II injuries which averaged 1.0 cm, but was of no clinical significance in most patients. These injuries must be reduced accurately. In the Type II epiphyseal separations unsatisfactory results were due to inadequate reduction or to associated injuries.

Résumé

Quarante-deux fractures, chez 41 malades, atteignant le cartilage épiphysaire de l'extrémité inférieure du fémur ont été colligées. L'âge moyen était de 11,2 ans. La période de surveillance a varié de 1 à 20,3 ans, avec une moyenne de 6,3 ans. La classification de Salter et Harris des lésions traumatiques du cartilage de conjugaison s'est avérée un bon indicateur du mécanisme et du pronostic. En utilisant, pour définir les résultats finaux, des critères rigoureux, on a trouvé que 2 patients sur 3 dans l'ensemble, et 3 sur 4 dans les 29 lésions des types I et II, avaient de bons ou d'excellents résultats. Le type V: écrasement du cartilage de conjugaison, les traumatismes ouverts, les fractures liées à des accidents de véhicules à grande vitesse, avec des déplacements importants ou chez les polytraumatisés, et les lésions épiphysaires incomplètement réduites, ont seuls donné des résultats médiocres ou mauvais. Les éléments principaux, facteurs de ces mauvais résultats, sont les désaxations en varus ou en valgus, la perte de la mobilité articulaire et le raccourcissement dû à une épiphysiodèse prématurée. Les orthoradiographies ont montré l'existence d'un certain degré de raccourcissement dans 20 des 29 types I et II, de l'ordre d'un cm, mais sans traduction clinique dans la majorité des cas. Ces lésions doivent être réduites avec précision. Dans le type II, les résultats insuffisants sont dus à une réduction incomplète ou à l'existence de traumatismes associés.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aitken, A. P., Magill, H. K.: Fractures involving the distal femoral epiphyseal cartilage. J. Bone Joint Surg. [Am.] 34, 96–108 (1952)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aitken, A. P.: Fractures of the epiphysis. Clin. Orthop. 41, 19–23 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bassett, F. H. III, Goldner, J. L.: Fractures involving the distal femoral epiphyseal growth line. South. Med. J. 55, 545–557 (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bergenfeldt, E.: Beiträge für Kenntnis der traumatischen Epiphysenlösungen an den langen Röhrenknochen der Extremitäten: Eine klinisch-röngenologische Studie. Acta Chir. Scand. 73 (Suppl. 28), 1–422 (1933)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cassebaum, W. H., Patterson, A. H.: Fractures of the distal femoral epiphysis. Clin. Orthop. 41, 79–91 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cotton, F. J.: Dislocations and joint fractures. 2nd edn. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Co. 1924

    Google Scholar 

  7. Crawford, A. H.: Fractures about the knee in children. Orthop. Clin. North Am. 7, 639–656 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ehlers, P. N., Eberlein, H.: Epiphyseal fractures. Clinical contribution to the problem of late sequalae. (Epiphysenfrakturen. Klinischer Beitrag zur Frage der Spätfolgen). Langenbecks Arch. Chir. 304, 627–630 (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hutchinson, J. Jr: Lectures on injuries to the epiphyses and their results. Br. Med. J. 1, 669–673 (1894)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Larson, R. L.: Epiphyseal injuries in the adolescent athlete. Orthop. Clin. North Am. 4, 839–851 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lee, Ch. L., Pedersen, H. E., LaMont, R. L.: Fractures of the distal femoral epiphysis. Presented at the 4th Annual Meeting of the A.A.O.S. Las Vegas, Nevada, Feb. 1977

  12. Lombardo, S. J., Harvey, J. P.: Fractures of the distal femoral epiphyses. J. Bone Joint Surg. [Am.] 59, 742–751 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Neer, C. S. II: Separation of the lower femoral epiphysis. Am. J. Surg. 99, 756–761 (1960)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nicholson, J. T., Nixon, J. E.: Epiphyseal fractures. J. Pediatr. 59, 939–950 (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nicholson, J. T.: Epiphyseal fractures about the knee. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Instructional Course Lectures, Vol. XVIII. St. Louis: C. V. Mosby 1961

    Google Scholar 

  16. Oh, W. H., Craig, C., Banks, H. H.: Epiphyseal injuries. Pediatr. Clin. North Am. 21, 407–422 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Poland, J.: Traumatic separation of the epiphyses. London: Smith, Elder & Co. 1898

    Google Scholar 

  18. Peterson, C. A., Peterson, H. A.: Analysis of the incidence of injuries to the epiphyseal growth plate. J. Traumatol. 12, 275–281 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rang, M.: The growth plate and its Disorders. Edinburgh and London: E. & S. Livingstone Ltd. 1969

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rang, M.: Children's fractures. Toronto: J. B. Lippincott Co. 1974

    Google Scholar 

  21. Roberts, J. M.: Fracture separation of the distal femoral epiphysis. In: Proceedings A.A.O.S. (Abstr.). J. Bone Joint Surg. [Am.] 55, 1324 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sakakida, K.: Clinical observation on the epiphyseal separation of long bones. Clin. Orthop. 34, 119–141 (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Salter, R. B., Harris, W. R.: Injuries involving the epiphyseal plate. J. Bone Joint Surg. [Am.] 45, 587–622 (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schnute, W. J.: Epiphyseal fractures. Rocky Mt. Med. J. 62, 43–47 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Siffert, R. S.: The growth plate and its affections. J. Bone Joint Surg. [Am.] 48, 546–563 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Stephens, D. C., Louis, E., Louis, D. S.: Traumatic separation of the distal femoral epiphyseal cartilage plate. J. Bone Joint Surg. [Am.] 56, 1383–1390 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tachdjian, M. O.: Fractures involving the distal femoral epiphysis. Pediatric Orthopedics. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Co. 1972

    Google Scholar 

  28. Tessore, A., Pollono, F.: Detachement of the lower epiphysis of the femur. (Il distacco dell'epifisi inferiore del femore). Minerva Ortop. 17, 35–43 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Weber, B. G.: Epiphyseal joint injuries (Epiphysenfugen-Verletzungen). Helv. Chir. Acta 31, 103–118 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Czitrom, A.A., Salter, R.B. & Willis, R.B. Fractures involving the distal epiphyseal plate of the femur. International Orthopaedics 4, 269–277 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00266068

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00266068

Key words

Navigation