Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 54, Issue 1, pp 7–9 | Cite as

Using regression coefficient as a stability parameter in plant breeding programs

  • K. Miezan
  • G. A. Milliken
  • G. H. Liang


Expanding the regression coefficient as stability parameter (Finlay and Wilkinson 1963) requires an unbiased interpretation of the parameter. Information on the covariances among the genotypes of the population must be specific, particularly when the assumed relatedness of the genotypes appears questionable. Such a problem, however, is not expected when the covariances between the genotypes are either zero or equal and possibly non zero.

Key words

Regression coefficient Stability parameter Covariance 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Breese, E.L.: The measurement and significance of genotype environment interactions in grasses. Heredity 24, 27–44 (1969)Google Scholar
  2. Comstock, R.E.; Moll, R.H.: Genotype-environment interaction. In: Statistical Genetics and Plant Breeding (eds. Hanson, W.D.; Robinson, H.F.) pp. 164–196, Washington, D.C.: Nat. Acad. Sci., Nat. Res. Council 1963Google Scholar
  3. Finlay, K.W.; Wilkinson, G.N.: The analysis of adaptation in a plant-breeding programme. Austr. J. Agric. Res. 14, 742–754 (1963)Google Scholar
  4. Johnson, V.A.; Shafer, L.; Schmidt, J.W.: Regression analysis of general adaptation in hard red winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Crop Sci. 8, 187–191 (1968)Google Scholar
  5. Jowett, D.: Yield stability parameters for sorghum in East Africa. Crop Sci. 6, 314–317 (1972)Google Scholar
  6. Knight, R.: The measurement and interpretation of genotype environment interactions. Euphytica 19, 225–235 (1970)Google Scholar
  7. Liang, G.H.; Heyne, E.G.; Walter, T.L.: Estimate of variety X environmental interactions in yield tests of three small grains and their significance on the breeding programs. Crop Sci. 6, 135–139 (1966)Google Scholar
  8. Perkins, J.M.; Jinks, J.L.: Environment and genotype-environmental components of variability. III. Multiple lines and crosses. Heredity 23, 339–356 (1968)Google Scholar
  9. Perkins, J.M.; Jinks, J.L.: Specificity of the interaction of genotypes with contrasting environments. Heredity 26, 463–474 (1971)Google Scholar
  10. Sprague, G.F.; Federer, W.T.: A comparison of variance components in corn yield trials. II. Error, year X variety, location X variety and variety components. Agron. J. 48, 535–541 (1951)Google Scholar
  11. Witcombe, J.R.; Whittington, W.J.: A study of the genotype by environment interaction shown by germinating seeds of Brassica napus. Heredity 26, 397–411 (1971)Google Scholar
  12. Yates, F.; Cochran, W.G.: The analysis of groups of experiments. J. Agric. Sci., Camb. 28, 556–580 (1938)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Miezan
    • 1
  • G. A. Milliken
    • 1
  • G. H. Liang
    • 1
  1. 1.Kansas State UniversityManhattanUSA

Personalised recommendations