Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 75, Issue 5, pp 784–794 | Cite as

Brassica taxonomy based on nuclear restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs)

1. Genome evolution of diploid and amphidiploid species
  • K. M. Song
  • T. C. Osborn
  • P. H. Williams


Restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs) of nuclear DNAs have been used to explore the origin and evolution of the six cultivated Brassica species. Extensive RFLP variation was found at the species, subspecies and variety levels. Based on RFLP data from Brassica and related genera, a detailed phylogenetic tree was generated using the PAUP microcomputer program, which permits a quantitative analysis of the interrelationships among Brassica species. The results suggested that 1) B. nigra originated from one evolutionary pathway with Sinapis arvensis or a close relative as the likely progenitor, whereas B. campestris and B. oleracea came from another pathway with a possible common ancestor in wild B. oleracea or a closely related nine chromosome species; 2) the amphidiploid species B. napus and B. juncea have evolved through different combinations of the diploid morphotypes and thus polyphyletic origins may be a common mechanism for the natural occurrence of amphidiploids in Brassica; 3) the cytoplasm has played an important role in the nuclear genome evolution of amphidiploid species when the parental diploid species contain highly differentiated cytoplasms. A scheme for the origins of diploid and amphidiploid species is depicted based on evidence gathered from nuclear RFLP analysis, cpDNA RFLP analysis, cytogenetic studies and classical taxonomy.

Key words

Brassica Genome evolution Phylogenetic tree Molecular taxonomy Restriction fragment length polymorphisms 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Attia T, Robbelen G (1986 a) Meiotic pairing in haploids and amphidiploids of spontaneous versus synthetic origin in rape, Brassica napus L. Can J Genet Cytol 28:330–334Google Scholar
  2. Attia T, Robbelen G (1986b) Cytogenetic relationship within cultivated Brassica analyzed in amphihaploids from the three diploid ancestors. Can J Genet Cytol 28:323–329Google Scholar
  3. Beckmann JS, Soller M (1986) Restriction fragment length polymorphisms and genetic improvement of agricultural species. Euphytica 35:111–124Google Scholar
  4. Burr B, Evola SV, Burr FA, Beckmann JS (1983) The application of restriction fragment length polymorphism to plant breeding. In: Setlow J, Hollaender A (eds) Genetic engineering, vol 5. Plenum, New York, pp 45–59Google Scholar
  5. Chen SR (1982) The origin and differentiation of mustard varieties in China. Cruciferae Newslett 7:7–10Google Scholar
  6. Coulthart M, Denford KE (1982) Isozyme studies in Brassica. I. Electrophoretic techniques for leaf enzymes and comparison of B. napus, B. campestris and B. oleracea using phosphoglucoisomerase. Can J Plant Sci 62:621–630Google Scholar
  7. Crouch ML, Tenbarge KM, Simon AE, Ferl R (1983) cDNA clones for Brassica napus seed storage proteins: Evidence from nucleotide sequence analysis that both subunits of napin are cleaved from a precursor polypeptide. J Mol Appl Genet 2:273–283Google Scholar
  8. Dass H, Nybom H (1967) The relationships between Brassica nigra, B. campestris, B. oleracea, and their amphidiploid hybrids studied by means of numerical chemotaxonomy. Can J Genet Cytol 9:880–890Google Scholar
  9. Erickson LR, Straus NA, Beversdorf WD (1983) Restriction patterns reveal origins of chloroplast genomes in Brassica amphidiploids. Theor Appl Genet 65:201–206Google Scholar
  10. Fan ZG, Tai W (1985) A cytogenetic study of monosomics in Brassica napus L. Can J Genet Cytol 27:683–688Google Scholar
  11. Felsenstein J (1982) Numerical methods for inferring evolutionary trees. Q Rev Biol 57:379–404Google Scholar
  12. Fink WL (1986) Microcomputers and phylogenetic analysis. Science 234:1135–1139Google Scholar
  13. Helentjaris T, King G, Slocum M, Siedenstrang C, Wegman S (1985) Restriction fragment polymorphisms as probes for plant diversity and their development as tools for applied plant breeding. Plant Mol Biol 5:109–118Google Scholar
  14. Inomata NC (1985) Hybrid progenies of the cross, B. campestris X B.oleracea. III. Cytogenetical studies on F2, B1 and other hybrids. Jpn J Genet 60:359–371Google Scholar
  15. Jansen RK, Palmer JD (1988) Phylogenetic implication of chloroplast DNA restriction site variation in the Mutisieae (Asteraceae). Amer J Bot (in press)Google Scholar
  16. Landry BS, Kesseli RV, Farrara B, Michelmore RW (1987) A genetic map of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) with restriction fragment length polymorphism, isozyme, disease resistance and morphological markers. Genetics 116:331–337Google Scholar
  17. Mizushima V (1980) Genome analysis in Brassica and allied genera. In: Tsunoda S, Hinata K, Gomez-Campo C (eds) Brassica crops and wild allies. Jpn Sci Soc Press, Tokyo, pp 89–105Google Scholar
  18. Mukherijea P (1975) Karymorphological studies of ten strains of India mustard (Brassica juncea Coss). Euphytica 24:483–486Google Scholar
  19. Nienhuis J, Helentjaris T, Slocum M, Ruggero B, Schaefer A (1987) Restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of loci associated with insect resistance in tomato. Crop Sci 27:797–803Google Scholar
  20. Olsson G (1960) Species crosses within the genus Brassica. II. Artificial Brassica juncea Coss. Hereditas 46:171–222Google Scholar
  21. Osborn TC, Alexander DC, Fobes JF (1987) Identification of restriction fragment length polymorphisms linked to genes controlling soluble solids content in tomato fruit. Theor Appl Genet 73:350–356Google Scholar
  22. Palmer JD, Shields CR, Cohen DB, Orton TJ (1983) Chloroplast DNA evolution and the origin of amphidiploid Brassica species. Theor Appl Genet 65:181–189Google Scholar
  23. Prakash S, Hinata K (1980) Taxonomy, cytogenetics and origin of crop Brassica, a review. Opera Bot 55:1–57Google Scholar
  24. Quiros CF, Kianian SF, Ochoa O, Douches D (1985) Genome evolution in Brassica: use of molecular markers and cytogenetic stocks. Cruciferae Newslett 10:21–23Google Scholar
  25. Quiros CF, Ochoa O, Kianian SF, Douches D (1986) Evolutionary trends in Brassica: gathering evidence from chromosome addition lines. Cruciferae Newslett 11:22–23Google Scholar
  26. Ramanujam S, Srinivasachar D (1943) Cytogenetic investigations in the genus Brassica and the artificial synthesis of B. juncea. Indian J Genet Plant Breed 3:73–88Google Scholar
  27. Saghai-Maroof MA, Soliman KM, Jorgensen RA, Allard RW (1984) Ribosomal DNA spacer-length polymorphisms in barley: Mendelian inheritance, chromosomal location, and population dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81:8014–8018Google Scholar
  28. Simon AE, Tenbarge KM, Scofield SR, Finkelstein RR, Crouch ML (1985) Nucleotide sequence of a cDNA clone of Brassica napus 12S storage protein shows homology with legumin from Pisum sativum. Plant Mol Biol 5:191–201Google Scholar
  29. Snogerup S (1980) The wild forms of the Brassica oleracea group (2n=18) and their possible relations to the cultivated ones. In: Tsunoda S, Hinata K, Gomez-Campo C (eds) Brassica crops and wild allies. Jpn Sci Soc Press, Tokyo, pp 121–132Google Scholar
  30. Sytsma KJ, Gottlieb LD (1986) Chloroplast DNA evolution and phylogenetic relationships in Clarkia sec. peripetasma (Onagraceae). Evolution 40:1248–1261Google Scholar
  31. Sytsma KJ, Schaal BA (1985) Phylogenetics of the Lisianthius skinneri (Gentianaceae) species complex in Panama utilizing DNA restriction fragment analysis. Evolution 39:594–608Google Scholar
  32. Takahata Y, Hinata K (1983) Studies on cytodemes in subtribe Brassicinae (Cruciferae). Tohoku J Agric Res 33:111–124Google Scholar
  33. Takahata Y, Hinata K (1986) Application of a pattern analysis (quantification method III) for the isozyme relations in crop Brassicas. Cruciferae Newslett 11:12–13Google Scholar
  34. U N (1935) Genome analysis in Brassica with special reference to the experimental formation of B. napus and peculiar mode of fertilization. Jpn J Bot 7:389–452Google Scholar
  35. Vaughan JG (1977) A multidisciplinary study of the taxonomy and origin of Brassica crops. BioScience 27:35–40Google Scholar
  36. Williams PH, Hill CB (1986) Rapid cycling populations of Brassica. Science 232:1385–1389Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. M. Song
    • 1
    • 2
  • T. C. Osborn
    • 2
  • P. H. Williams
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plant PathologyUniversity of WisconsinMadisonUSA
  2. 2.Department of AgronomyUniversity of WisconsinMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations