Skip to main content
Log in

Peculiarities in PMC Meiosis of Pisum sativum

  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The general outline of meiotic prophase proposed by Wilson in 1925 included three stages which usually are missing in the description of meiosis today: (1) synizesis (= the synaptic stage in plants), (2) the diffuse stage, which follows the pachytene and (3) the second contraction, following the diffuse stage. The last two stages were regarded by Wilson as being very variable and could even be lacking. These stages, described by early plant cytologists later became regarded as fixation artefacts and after the introduction of the squash technique were either misinterpreted and/or forgotten.

However, all three stages are easily recognised in aceticethanol fixed preparations of plant meiosis and are demonstrated in Pisum sativum meiosis. Pisum meiosis differs from the usual plant meiosis by: (1) the peculiar timing of the late prophase, (2) the existence of extrachromosomal fibrillar structures appearing at synizesis and staining by Feulgen — Light Green, and (3) the appearance of multiple nucleoli in the late prophase. The possibility that these nucleoli and fibrillar structures are of relevance in relation to gene amplification is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature

  • Atabekova, A.J. (1959): Cytologische Untersuchungen an der Kulturerbse Pisum sativum. Biol. Zbl. 3, 424–438

    Google Scholar 

  • Bier, K.; Kunz, W.; Ribbert, D. (1967): Struktur und Funktion der Oocytenchromosomen und Nukleolen sowie der Extra-DNS während der Oogenese panoistischer und meroistischer Insekten. Chromosoma 23, 214–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, W.A. (1903): Studies in plant hybrids: the spermatogenesis of hybrid peas. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 30, 510–543

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, G. (1938): Cytological investigations of Pisum sativum. Bot. Gaz. 99, 584–591

    Google Scholar 

  • Gall, J.G. (1968): Differential synthesis of the genes for ribosomal RNA during amphibian oogenesis. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (Wash.) 60, 553–560

    Google Scholar 

  • Gall, J.G. (1969): The genes for ribosomal RNA during oogenesis. Genetics (suppl.) 61, 121–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottschalk, W.; Baquar, S.R. (1971): Desynapsis in Pisum sativum induced through gene mutation. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 13, 138–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottschalk, W.; Baquar, S.R. (1973): Highly unstable translocations induced through irradiation in Pisum. Cytologia 38, 327–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottschalk, W.; Milutinović, M. (1970): Die Analyse hochgradiger Chromosomenverkettungen in der Meiosis von Pisum sativum. Caryologia 23, 473–488

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottschalk, W.; Villabos-Petrini, R. (1965): The influence of mutant genes on chiasma formation. Cytologia 30, 88–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Håkansson, A. (1931): Über Chromosomenverkettung in Pisum. Hereditas 15, 17–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Håkansson, A.; Levan, A. (1942): Nucleolar conditions in Pisum. Hereditas 28, 436–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Klášterská, I. (1977): The concept of the prophase of meiosis. Hereditas 86, 205–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Klášterská, I. (1978): Structure of eukaryotic chromosomes: The differences between mammalian (mouse), grasshopper (Stethophyma) and plant (Rosa) chromosomes as revealed at the diffuse stage of meiosis. Hereditas 88, 243–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Klášterská, I.; Natarajan, A.T. (1974): Cytological studies of the genus Rosa with special reference to the section Caninae. Hereditas 76, 97–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Klášterská, I.; Ramel, C. (1979): Prophase of plant meiosis: sequences and interpretation of stages. Genetica 51, 15–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Klášterská, I.; Ramel, C. (1980a): Sequence and interpretation of meiotic prophase stages in PMCs of Najas marina (Najadaceae). Hereditas 92, 171–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Klášterská, I.; Ramel, C. (1980b): Meiosis in PMCs of Arabidopsis thaliana. Arabidopsis Inf. Serv. 17, 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, H.D. (1971): Eine Pisum Mutante mit zahlreichen meiotischen Störungen. Cytologia 36, 15–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, H.D. (1972): Genetic control of chromosome morphology. Pisum Newsl. 4, 12–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamm, R. (1976): Technical hints for chromosome studies in Pisum. Hereditas 84, 235–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewitsky, G.A. (1927): Die Bildung bivalenter Chromosomen in der Gonogenese von Beta vulgaris L. Planta 3, 100–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, J.W.; Lin, S.C. (1955): Chromosomes and nucleoli in Pisum sativum. Nature 175, 343–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, L.W. (1926): An Introduction to Cytology. 2. ed. New York: McGraw-Hill

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, E.; Heslop-Harrison, J.; Dickinson, H.G. (1973): The activity of the nucleolus organising region and the origin of cytoplasmic nucleoloids in meiocytes of Lilium. Protoplasma 77, 79–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E.B. (1925): The Cell in Development and Heredity. 3. edition. New York: McMillan

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by Å. Gustafsson

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Klášterská, I., Ramel, C. Peculiarities in PMC Meiosis of Pisum sativum . Theoret. Appl. Genetics 59, 297–302 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00264981

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00264981

Key words

Navigation