Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of surgical staples for ligation of the renal pedicle during nephrectomy

  • Published:
Urological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A mechanical stapling instrument was evaluated for ligation of the renal pedicle during nephrectomy in nine healthy sheep. Two forms of disposable loading unit, from which stainless steel surgical staples could be dispensed in double or triple staggered row configuration, were assessed for their proper function when applied across the renal pedicle singularly or in series. The response of the sheep to surgery was assessed by physical, hematological, and serum chemistry evaluations. Tissue healing was determined by gross and histopathological examinations. Ligation and transection of the pedicle took 2 to 4 minutes. The vessels of the pedicle ranged in diameter from 3 to 12 mm. In two sheep, overzealous stripping of perivascular tissue from the renal pedicle prior to placement of a triple staggered row of staples resulted in mild hemorrhage from the renal stump. This was controlled by placing a second triple staggered row of staples proximal to the first. It was concluded that ligation of the renal pedicle could be performed rapidly, effectively, and safely in healthy sheep using the correctly applied mechanical stapler. It is inferred that a similar technique would be applicable to other species including man.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aivazian AV (1980) Mechanical suture of the vascular pedicle of the kidney in nephrectomy. Voen Med Zh 1:59–60

    Google Scholar 

  2. Flye MW, Fish JC (1982) Separation of en bloc cadaveric kidneys with a linear anastomosis stapler. Arch Surg 117:251

    Google Scholar 

  3. Glenn JF (1975) Urologic surgery, 2nd ed. Harper and Row, Hagerstown, p 82

    Google Scholar 

  4. Khalid M (1981) Mechanical tantalum suture in kidney resection. Urol Nefrol (Mosk) 3:49–52

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lacombe M (1985) Renal arteriovenous fistula following nephrectomy. Urology 225:13–16

    Google Scholar 

  6. Scott RF, Selzman HM (1966) Complications of nephrectomy: Review of 450 patients and a description of a modification of the transperitoneal approach. J Urol 95:307–312

    Google Scholar 

  7. Smith DR, Schulte JW, Smart WR (1970) Nephrectomy. In: Campbell MF, Harrison JW (eds) Urology, vol 3. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 2173–2178

    Google Scholar 

  8. Unpublished data (1987) United States Surgical Corporation. Norwalk, CT

  9. Wise GJ (1984) Reasons for nephrectomy for non-malignant disease. In: Current operative urology, 2nd ed. Harper and Row, Philadelphia, p 142

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported by the United States Surgical Corporation, Norwalk, Connecticut

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kirker-Head, C.A., Steckel, R.R., Schwartz, A. et al. Evaluation of surgical staples for ligation of the renal pedicle during nephrectomy. Urol. Res. 16, 63–66 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00264632

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00264632

Key words

Navigation