The Zooplankton community of Croker Passage, Antarctic Peninsula

Summary

Zooplankton species composition, abundance and vertical distribution were investigated in the upper 1000 m of Croker Passage, Antarctic Peninsula during the austral fall (March–April, 1983). 106 species were identified, many being mesopelagic and reported previously from the Southern Ocean. The most numerous species (>1000/100 m³) were the copepodsMetridia gerlachei, Microcalanus pygmaeus, Oncaea antarctica andOncaea curvata. Oncaea curvata alone constituted half the zooplakton population. Zooplankton biomass was dominated by three copepod species,Metridia gerlachei, Calanoides aculus andEuchaeta antarctica,which comprised 74% of the biomass. Size analysis revealed most of the zooplankton numbers were in the >1 mm fraction. The biomass distribution was polymodal with major maxima in the >1 mm and the 4–4.9 mm size classe. The >1 mm peak, exclusive of protozoans, was primarily copepod nauplii and copepodites ofOncaea, Metridia andMicrocalanus. The 4–4.9 mm peak was mostlyCalanoides acutus andMetridia gerlachei.

All of the principal species had broad vertical distributions both day and night. There was some suggestion of diel vertial migration byMetridia gerlachei andEuchaeta antarctica, with segments of their populations migrating into the upper 100 m and 200 m, respectively, at night. Most of the dominant and subdominant species were concentrated below 200 m,with only the subdominantOithona similis having its maximum in the epipelagic zone. The occurrence of zooplankton at winter depths appears to have been earlier in Croker Passage in 1983 than has been generally reported for waters south of the Polar Front.

Total standing stock of net-caught zooplankton (>15 mm) in the upper 1000 m was estimated at 3.1 gDW/m², which is somewhat higher than values reported for the West Wind Drift and for open ocean areas of temperate to tropical latitudes.Euphausia superba (17–52 mm) dominated the pelagic biomass, exceeding zooplankton standing stock under a square meter of ocean by a factor of 15. This is in contrast to lower latitudes where zooplankton biomass is usually greater than macrozooplankton-micronekton.