Advertisement

Chirurgia plastica

, Volume 8, Issue 3, pp 129–135 | Cite as

The “pocket” method of onlay bone grafting

  • I. T. Jackson
  • R. H. Nellen
Article

Summary

There are several problems in bone grafting around the face. The first is that unless an intraoral approach is used, there is an external scar, which can be unsightly. The second is that resorption of the bone graft may occur. The third is that even with good pressure, hematoma may develop. In order to overcome some of these objections, a method of pocket bone grafting has been developed. From a remote area, hidden within the hairline or within the lower fornix of the eyelid, or using a previous scar, or with a buccal sulcus approach, a subperiosteal tunnel is elevated leading to a subperiosteal pocket overlying the defect. Through the subperiosteal tunnel, cancellous bone, or skull bone chips can be introduced and packed into the pocket until it is possibly some-what overfilled. A small suction drain can then be placed to drain any hematoma; it is then possible to manipulate the bone graft from the outside to give the desired contours. In the short term, this has been successful in that there has been no scarring. We have drained a significant amount of blood from the grafted areas in the first 48 h, and so far in the short-term follow-up, resorption has not been a problem, but this latter finding requires further study.

Key words

Cancellous bone graft Augmentation Contour defects Maxillofacial reconstruction 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Converse JM, Campbell RM (1954) Bone grafts in surgery of the face. Surg Clin 8:279Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dingman RO, Natvig P (1964) Surgery of facial fractures. Saunders, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gorlin RJ, Pindborg JJ, Cohen MMJr (1976) Syndromes of the head and neck. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jackson IT, Pellett C, Smith JM (1983) The skull as a bone graft donor site. Ann Plast Surg 11:527Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jackson IT, Smith J, Mixter RC (1983) Nasal bone grafting using split skull grafts. Ann Plast Surg 11:533PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Longacre JJ, de Stefano GA (1957) Further observations of the behavior of autogenous split-rib grafts in reconstruction of extensive defects of the cranium and face. Plast Reconstr Surg 20:281Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mowlem R (1965) Cancellous chip bone grafts: Report of 75 cases. Lancet II:746Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Poswillo D (1973) The pathogenesis of the first and second branchial arch syndrome. Oral Surg 35:302Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tessier P (1981) Aesthetic aspects of bone grafting to the face. Clin Plast Surg 8:279Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Whitaker LA, Broennle AM, Kerr LP, Herlich A (1980) Improvements in craniofacial reconstruction: Methods evolved in 235 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 65:561Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. T. Jackson
    • 1
  • R. H. Nellen
    • 2
  1. 1.Section of Plastic and Reconstructive SurgeryMayo ClinicRochesterUSA
  2. 2.Section of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryMayo ClinicRochesterUSA

Personalised recommendations