Planta

, Volume 198, Issue 4, pp 588–594 | Cite as

Modification of reproductive development in Arabidopsis thaliana under spaceflight conditions

  • Anxiu Kuang
  • Mary E. Musgrave
  • Sharon W. Matthews
Article

Abstract

Reproductive development in Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. cv. Columbia plants was investigated under spaceflight conditions on shuttle mission STS-51. Plants launched just prior to initiation of the reproductive phase developed flowers and siliques during the 10-d flight. Approximately 500 flowers were produced in total by the 12 plants in both the ground control and spaceflight material, and there was no significant difference in the number of flowers in each size class. The flower buds and siliques of the spaceflight plants were not morphologically different from the ground controls. Pollen viability tests immediately post-flight using fluorescein diacetate indicated that about 35% of the pollen was viable in the spaceflight material. Light-microscopy observations on this material showed that the female gametophytes also had developed normally to maturity. However, siliques from the spaceflight plants contained empty, shrunken ovules, and no evidence of pollen transfer to stigmatic papillae was found by light microscopy immediately post-flight or by scanning electron microscopy on fixed material. Short stamen length and indehiscent anthers were observed in the spaceflight material, and a film-like substance inside the anther that connected to the tapetum appeared to restrict the release of pollen from the anthers. These observations indicate that given appropriate growing conditions, early reproductive development in A. thaliana can occur normally under spaceflight conditions. On STS-51, reproductive development aborted due to obstacles in pollination or fertilization.

Key words

Arabidopsis Female gametophyte Pollen Reproduction Spaceflight 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brown CS, Obenland CM, Musgrave ME (1993) Spaceflight effects on growth, carbohydrate concentration and chlorophyll content in Arabidopsis. Am Soc Gravit Space Biol Bull 7: 83Google Scholar
  2. Conrad HM (1968) Biochemical changes in the developing wheat seedling in the weightless state. BioScience 18: 645–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Corey KA, Wheeler RM (1992) Gas exchange in NASA's biomass production chamber. BioScience 42: 503–509CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Crispi ML, Porterfield DM, Musgrave ME (1995) Control of growth and reproductive development in Arabidopsis thaliana by non-earthnormal metabolic gas ratios. Am Soc Gravit Space Biol Bull 9:50Google Scholar
  5. Dawson J, Wilson ZA, Aarts MGM, Braithwaite AF, Briarty LG, Mulligan BJ (1992) Microspore and pollen development in six male-sterile mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana. Can J Bot 71: 629–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Halstead TW, Dutcher FR (1984) Experiments on plants grown in space: status and prospects. Ann Bot 54: 3–18 (Suppl 3)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Halstead TW, Dutcher FR (1987) Plants in space. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 38: 317–345CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Heslop-Harrison J, Heslop-Harrison Y, Shivanna KR (1984) The evaluation of pollen quality, and a further appraisal of the fluorochromatic (FCR) test procedure. Theor Appl Genet 67: 367–375CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Johnson SP, Tibbitts TW (1968) The liminal angle of a plagiotropic organ under weightlessness. BioScience 18: 655–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kordyum EL, Sytnik KM, Chernyaeva II (1983) Peculiarities of genital organ formation in Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. under spaceflight conditions. Adv Space Res 3: 247–250CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Krikorian AD, Levine HG (1991) Development and growth in space. In: F.C. Steward (ed.), Plant physiology: Growth and development. New York: Academic Press, 10: 491–555Google Scholar
  12. Kuang A, Musgrave ME, Matthews SW, Tucker SC (1995) Pollen and ovule development in Arabidopsis thaliana under spaceflight conditions. Am J Bot 82: 585–595CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Mansfield SG, Briarty LG, Erni S (1991) Early embryogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. I. The mature embryo sac. Can J Bot 69: 447–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mashinsky A, Ivanova I, Derendyaeva T, Nechitailo G, Salisbury F (1994) “From seed-to-seed” experiment with wheat plants under space-flight conditions. Adv Space Res 14: 13–19CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Merkys AI, Laurinavichyus RS (1983) Complete cycle of individual development of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. plants on board the Salyut-7 orbital station. Dok Akad Nauk SSSR 271: 509–512Google Scholar
  16. Misra RC (1962) Contribution to the embryology of Arabidopsis thaliana (Gay & Monn.). Agra Univ J Res Sci 11: 191–198Google Scholar
  17. Murgia M, Huang BQ, Tucker SC, Musgrave ME (1993) Embryo sac lacking antipodal cells in Arabidopsis thaliana (Brassicaceae). Am J Bot 80: 824–838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Musgrave ME, Cummins DB, Matthews SW, Kuang A, Daugherty CJ, Porterfield DM (1993) Growth and flowering of Arabidopsis thaliana during spaceflight. Am Soc Gravit Space Biol Bull 7:83Google Scholar
  19. Musgrave ME, Strain BR (1988) Response of two wheat cultivars to CO2 enrichment under subambient oxygen conditions. Plant Physiol 87: 346–350CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Olson RL, Oleson MV, Slavin TJ (1988) CELSS for advanced manned missions. HortScience 23: 275–286PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Quebedeaux B, Hardy RWF (1973) Oxygen as a new factor controlling reproductive growth. Nature 243: 477–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Porterfield DM, Daugherty CJ, Matthews SW, Musgrave ME (1994) Evidence of hypoxia in the roots of Arabidopsis thaliana during spaceflight. Am Soc Gravit Space Biol Bull 8: 14Google Scholar
  23. Spurr AR (1969) A low viscosity epoxy resin embedding medium for electron microscopy. J Ultrastruct Res 26: 31–43CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Umbreit WW, Burris RH, Stauffer JF (1957) Manometric techniques. Burgess Publishing Co, Minneapolis, MinnesotaGoogle Scholar
  25. Volkmann D, Behrens HM, Sievers A (1986) Development and gravity sensing of cress roots under microgravity. Naturwissenschaften 73: 438–441CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Webb MC, Gunning BES (1990) Embryo sac development in Arabidopsis thaliana: I. Megasporogenesis including the microtubular cytoskeleton. Sex Plant Reprod 3: 244–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anxiu Kuang
    • 1
  • Mary E. Musgrave
    • 1
  • Sharon W. Matthews
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Plant Pathology and Crop Physiology, Louisiana Agricultural Experiment StationLouisiana State University Agricultural CenterBaton RougeUSA
  2. 2.Department of Plant BiologyLouisiana State UniversityBaton RougeUSA

Personalised recommendations