Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of new-anthracycline analogs with the human tumor stem cell assay

  • Original Articles
  • Anthracycline Analogs Tumor Stem Cell Assay
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Ten anthracyclines, including doxorubicin (DX) and daunorubicin (DNR), and eight analogs with modifications in structure or stereochemistry of the aglycone and/or the aminosugar moiety were simultaneously tested in serial in vitro titration studies against human adenocarcinomas in the human tumor stem cell assay. More than a two-log range in cytotoxicity of the various anthracyclines was observed with the tumors tested. Marked individual differences in sensitivity of specific tumors (breast, lung, peritoneal) were observed for the various analogs. By assessing average effects on survival of tumor colony-forming units (TCFU) in the tumors tested, the three compounds lacking the methoxyl group in position 4 of the aglycone (4-demethoxyDX, 4-demethoxy-4′-epiDX, 4-demethoxyDNR) all proved to be more cytotoxic than their parent compounds. compounds modified in position 4′ of the aminosugar were on average either as toxic (4′ epiDX) or more toxic (4′-deoxyDX and 4′-0-methylDX) to TCFU than the parent compound DX. On average, 11-deoxyDX was less toxic than DX or the other eight anthracyclines tested. The results obtained are also in good general agreement with those previously reported for anthracyclines with human tumors in xenografts or cancer patients. These antitumor results viewed in concert with toxicology studies in normal mice (including evidence of a lack of cardiac toxicity) suggest that 4′ deoxyDX may prove to be a clinically useful anthracycline analog. We also conclude that use of this clinically predicitive in vitro soft agar assay provides a rapid and relatively inexpensive means of simultaneously testing a large number of analogs of a parent compound against a spectrum of human tumors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alberts DS, Chen H-SG, Soehnlen B, Salmon SE, Surwit EA, Young L, Moon TE (1980) In vitro clonogenic assay for predicting response of ovarian cancer to chemotherapy. Lancet 2: 340

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alberts DS, Chen H-SG, Salmon SE, Surwit EA, Young L, Moon TE, Meyskens FL (1981) Chemotherapy of ovarian cancer directed by the human tumor stem cell assay. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol (in press)

  3. Arcamone F, Di Marco A, Casazza AM (1978) Chemistry and pharmacology of new antitumor anthracyclines. In: Umezawa H. (ed) Advances in cancer chemotherapy. Japanese Science Society, Tokyo University Park Press, Baltimore, pp 297–312

    Google Scholar 

  4. Benjamin RS, Riggs CE, Bachur NR (1977) Plasma pharmacokinetics of adriamycin and its metabolites in humans with normal hepatic and renal function. Cancer Res 37: 1416

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bonfante V, Villani F, Bonadonna G, Veronesi U (1979) Phase I study of 4′-epi-adriamycin (epi-ADM). Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 20: 172

    Google Scholar 

  6. Casazza AM (1979) Experimental evaluation of anthracycline analogs. Cancer Treat Rep 63: 835

    Google Scholar 

  7. Casazza AM, Di Marco A, Bertazzoli C, Formelli F, Giuliana F, Pratesi G (1978) Antitumor activity, toxicity, and pharmacological properties of 4′-epiadriamycin. In: Siegenthaler W, Luthy R (eds) current chemotherapy. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, pp 1257–2360

    Google Scholar 

  8. Casazza AM, Di Marco A, Bonadonna G, Bonfante V, Bertazzoli C, Bellini O, Pratesi G, Sala L, Ballerini L (1980) Effects of modifications in position 4 of the chromophore or in position 4′ of the aminosugar, on the antitumor activity and toxicity of daunorubicin and doxorubicin. In: Crooke ST, Reich SD (eds) Anthracyclines: current status and new developments. Academic Press, New York, pp 404–430

    Google Scholar 

  9. Casazza AM, Bellini O, Savi G, Di Marco A (1981) Antitumor activity and cardiac toxicity of 4′-deoxydoxorubicin (4′-deoxyDX) in mice. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 22: 267

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cassinelli G, Di Matteo F, Forenza S, Ripamonti MC, Rivola G, Arcamone F, Di Marco A, Casazza AM, Soranzo C, Pratesi G (1980) New anthracycline glycoside from micromonospora II, isolation, characterization and biological properties. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 33: 1468

    Google Scholar 

  11. Di Marco A, Lenaz L, Casazza AM, Scarpinato BM (1972) (NSC-82151) against mouse mammary carcinoma. Cancer Chemother Rep 56: 153

    Google Scholar 

  12. Di Marco A, Casazza AM, Giuliani F, Pratesi G, Arcamone F, Bernardi L, Franchi G, Giardino P, Patelli B, Penco S (1978a) Synthesis and antitumor activity of 4-demethoxyadriamycin and 4-demethoxy-4′-epiadriamycin. Cancer Treat Rep 62: 375

    Google Scholar 

  13. Di Marco A, Casazza AM, Soranzo C, Pratesi G (1978b) Effect of various substitutions in position 1, 2, 3, and 4 of 4-demethoxydaunorubicin and 4-demethoxyadriamycin. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1: 249

    Google Scholar 

  14. Giuliana FC, Kaplan NO (1980) New doxorubicin analogs active against doxorubicin-resistant colon tumor xenografts in the nude mouse. Cancer Res 40: 4682

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hamburger AW, Salmon SE (1977) Primary bioassay of human tumor stem cells. Science 197: 461

    Google Scholar 

  16. Salmon SE (ed) (1980) Cloning of human tumor stem cells. Alan R. Liss, New York

    Google Scholar 

  17. Salmon SE (1981) Applications of the human tumor stem cell assay in the development of anticancer therapy. In: Burchenal JH, Oettgen HF (eds) Cancer — Achievements, challenges and prospects for the 1980s. Grune & Stratton, New York, pp 33–44

    Google Scholar 

  18. Salmon SE, Hamburger AW, Soehnlen B, Durie BGM, Alberts DS, Moon TE (1978) Quantitation of differential sensitivity of human tumor stem cells to anticancer drugs. N Engl J Med 298: 1321

    Google Scholar 

  19. Salmon SE, Meyskens FL, Alberts DS, Soehnlen B, Young L (1981) New drugs in ovarian cancer and malignant melanoma: In vitro phase II screening with the human tumor clonogenic cell assay. Cancer Treat Rep 65: 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  20. Venditti J, Plowman M, Wolpert M (1981) report to Board of Scientific Counselors, Division of Cancer Treatment, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland

    Google Scholar 

  21. Villani F, Piccinini F, Favalli L (1980) Anthracycline analogs: correlation between calcium turnover in guinea pig atria and cardiotoxicity in humans. In: Nelson JD, Grossi C (eds) Current chemotherapy and infectious disease, vol II. American Society of Microbiology, Washington, pp 1696–1698

    Google Scholar 

  22. Von Hoff DD, Casper J, Bradley E, Jones D, Makuch R (1981) Association between human tumor colony forming assay results and response of an individual patient's tumor to chemotherapy. Am J Med 70: 1027–1032

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Salmon, S.E., Liu, R.M. & Casazza, A.M. Evaluation of new-anthracycline analogs with the human tumor stem cell assay. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 6, 103–109 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00262325

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00262325

Keywords

Navigation