Bibliography
Peter B.Andrews, A Transfinite Type Theory with Type Variables, North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1965.
Alan RossAnderson and Nuel D.BelnapJr., Entailment. The Logic of Relevance and Necessity, Volume I, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1975.
C. AnthonyAnderson, ‘Some New Axioms for the Logic of Sense and Denotation: Alternative (0)’, Noûs 14 (1980), pp. 217–234.
GeorgeBealer, ‘Completeness in the Theory of Properties, Relations, and Propositions’, The Journal of Symbolic Logic 48 (1983), pp. 415–426.
C. D.Broad, Examination of McTaggert's Philosophy, Volume I, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1933.
RudolfCarnap, Meaning and Necessity, Chicago University Press, Chicago, 1947 and 1956.
AlonzoChurch, Review of Morton White's ‘A Note on the “Paradox of Analysis”’, Max Black's ‘The “Paradox of Analysis” Again: A reply’, Morton White's ‘Analysis and Identity: A Rejoinder’, and Max Black's ‘How Can Analysis Be Informative?’, The Journal of Symbolic Logic 2 (1946), pp. 132–133.
AlonzoChurch, ‘Intensional Isomorphism and Identity of Belief’, Philosophical Studies 5 (1954), pp. 65–73.
AlonzoChurch, ‘A Formulation of the Logic of Sense and Denotation’, in PaulHenle et al. (eds.), Structure, Method, and Meaning, Essays in Honor of Henry M. Sheffer, the Liberal Arts Press, New York, 1951.
AlonzoChurch, Introduction to Mathematical Logic, Volume I, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1956.
Alonzo Church, ‘Outline of a Revised Formulation of the Logic of Sense and Denotation (Part I), Noûs 7 (1973); (Part II) Noûs 8 (1974).
AlonzoChurch, ‘Russellian Simple Type Theory’, Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 1973–1974 47 (1974), pp. 21–33.
AlonzoChurch, ‘Set Theory with a Universal Set’, Rassegna Internazionale di Logica 8 (1977), pp. 11–23.
DonaldDavidson, ‘The Method of Extension and Intension’, in Paul A.Schilpp (ed.), The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, Open Court, LaSalle, Illinois, 1963.
The Elements of Euclid, IsaacTodhunter (ed.), Everyman's Library, London, 1933.
Gottlob Frege, Philosophical and Mathematical Correspondence, Gottfried Gabriel et al. (eds.), The University of Chicago Press, 1980.
GottlobFrege, ‘Negation’ in Collected Papers on Mathematics, Logics, and Philosophy, BrianMcGuinness (ed.), Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1984.
ImmanuelKant, Kant's Introduction to Logic, Thomas Kingsmill Abbott (trans.), Philosphical Library, New York, 1963.
DavidKaplan, ‘Quantifying In’, in D.Davidson and J.Hintikka (eds.), Words and Objections: Essays on the Work of W. V. Quine, D. Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht-Holland, 1969. Reprinted in [25].
WilliamKneale and MarthaKneale, The Development of Logic, Oxford University Press, London, 1962.
Saul A.Kripke, ‘A Puzzle About Belief’, in Meaning and Use, A.Margalit (ed.), D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1979.
C. H. Langford, ‘The Notation of Analysis in Moore's Philosophy’, in Paul A. Schilpp (ed.), The Philosophy of G. E. Moore, Northwestern University Press, 1942.
Gottfried WilhelmLeibniz, ‘On Universal Synthesis and Analysis, or the Art of Discovery and Judgment’ in Philosophical Papers and Letters, Vol. 1, Leroy E.Loemker (ed. and trans.), The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, 1956.
LeonardLinsky, ‘Some Notes on Carnap's Concept of Intensional Isomorphism and the Paradox of Analysis’, Philosophy of Science 16 (1949), pp. 343–347.
LeonardLinsky (ed.), Reference and Modality, Oxford University Press, London, 1971.
BensonMates, ‘Synonymity’, University of California Publications in Philosophy 25 (1950), pp. 201–226.
RichardMontague, ‘On the Nature of Certain Philosophical Entities’, The Monist 53 (1969), pp. 159–194.
JohnMyhill, ‘Problems Arising in the Formalization of Intensional Logic’, Logique et Analyse 1 (1958), pp. 78–83.
JohnMyhill, ‘An Alternative to the Method of Intension and Extension’, in Paul A.Schilpp (ed.), The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, Open Court, LaSalle, Illinois, 1963.
RobertNozick, Philosophical Explanations, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1981.
JosephOwens, ‘Synonymy and the Nonindividualistic Model of the Mental’, Synthese 66 (1986), pp. 361–382.
Mario Pieri, ‘Sur la géométrie envisagée comme un système purement logique’, 1 er Congres International de Philosophie, Tome 3, Paris, 1900.
W. V. O.Quine, Word and Object, John Wiley and Sons, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1960.
W. V. O.Quine, ‘Reference and Modality’, in From a Logical Point of View, Harper and Row, New York, 1961. Reprinted in [25].
W. V. O.Quine, ‘Quantifiers and Propositional Attitudes’, in The Ways of Paradox, Random House, New York, 1966. Reprinted in [25].
Frank P.Ramsey, ‘Universals’ in Foundations. Essays in Philosophy, Logic, Mathematics and Economics, D. H.Mellor (ed.), Humanities Press, Atlantic Highlands, New Jersey, 1978.
BertrandRussell, Principles of Mathematics, W. W. Norton & Co., Inc., New York, 1938; first published 1903.
BertrandRussell, ‘The Philosophy of Logical Atomism’ in Logic and Knowledge, Robert C.Marsh (ed.), George Allen & Unwin, London, 1956.
ErnestSosa, ‘Classical Analysis’, The Journal of Philosophy 80 (1983), pp. 695–710.
JohnWallace, ‘Belief and Satisfaction’, Noûs 6 (1972), pp. 85–95.
Alfred North Whitehead and Bertrand Russell, Pricipia Mathematica, Volume I, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1910.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Anderson, C.A. Bealer's Quality and concept . J Philos Logic 16, 115–164 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00257837
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00257837