Skip to main content
Log in

Bealer's Quality and concept

  • Published:
Journal of Philosophical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Peter B.Andrews, A Transfinite Type Theory with Type Variables, North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alan RossAnderson and Nuel D.BelnapJr., Entailment. The Logic of Relevance and Necessity, Volume I, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  3. C. AnthonyAnderson, ‘Some New Axioms for the Logic of Sense and Denotation: Alternative (0)’, Noûs 14 (1980), pp. 217–234.

    Google Scholar 

  4. GeorgeBealer, ‘Completeness in the Theory of Properties, Relations, and Propositions’, The Journal of Symbolic Logic 48 (1983), pp. 415–426.

    Google Scholar 

  5. C. D.Broad, Examination of McTaggert's Philosophy, Volume I, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  6. RudolfCarnap, Meaning and Necessity, Chicago University Press, Chicago, 1947 and 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  7. AlonzoChurch, Review of Morton White's ‘A Note on the “Paradox of Analysis”’, Max Black's ‘The “Paradox of Analysis” Again: A reply’, Morton White's ‘Analysis and Identity: A Rejoinder’, and Max Black's ‘How Can Analysis Be Informative?’, The Journal of Symbolic Logic 2 (1946), pp. 132–133.

    Google Scholar 

  8. AlonzoChurch, ‘Intensional Isomorphism and Identity of Belief’, Philosophical Studies 5 (1954), pp. 65–73.

    Google Scholar 

  9. AlonzoChurch, ‘A Formulation of the Logic of Sense and Denotation’, in PaulHenle et al. (eds.), Structure, Method, and Meaning, Essays in Honor of Henry M. Sheffer, the Liberal Arts Press, New York, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  10. AlonzoChurch, Introduction to Mathematical Logic, Volume I, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Alonzo Church, ‘Outline of a Revised Formulation of the Logic of Sense and Denotation (Part I), Noûs 7 (1973); (Part II) Noûs 8 (1974).

  12. AlonzoChurch, ‘Russellian Simple Type Theory’, Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 1973–1974 47 (1974), pp. 21–33.

    Google Scholar 

  13. AlonzoChurch, ‘Set Theory with a Universal Set’, Rassegna Internazionale di Logica 8 (1977), pp. 11–23.

    Google Scholar 

  14. DonaldDavidson, ‘The Method of Extension and Intension’, in Paul A.Schilpp (ed.), The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, Open Court, LaSalle, Illinois, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  15. The Elements of Euclid, IsaacTodhunter (ed.), Everyman's Library, London, 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gottlob Frege, Philosophical and Mathematical Correspondence, Gottfried Gabriel et al. (eds.), The University of Chicago Press, 1980.

  17. GottlobFrege, ‘Negation’ in Collected Papers on Mathematics, Logics, and Philosophy, BrianMcGuinness (ed.), Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  18. ImmanuelKant, Kant's Introduction to Logic, Thomas Kingsmill Abbott (trans.), Philosphical Library, New York, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  19. DavidKaplan, ‘Quantifying In’, in D.Davidson and J.Hintikka (eds.), Words and Objections: Essays on the Work of W. V. Quine, D. Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht-Holland, 1969. Reprinted in [25].

    Google Scholar 

  20. WilliamKneale and MarthaKneale, The Development of Logic, Oxford University Press, London, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Saul A.Kripke, ‘A Puzzle About Belief’, in Meaning and Use, A.Margalit (ed.), D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  22. C. H. Langford, ‘The Notation of Analysis in Moore's Philosophy’, in Paul A. Schilpp (ed.), The Philosophy of G. E. Moore, Northwestern University Press, 1942.

  23. Gottfried WilhelmLeibniz, ‘On Universal Synthesis and Analysis, or the Art of Discovery and Judgment’ in Philosophical Papers and Letters, Vol. 1, Leroy E.Loemker (ed. and trans.), The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  24. LeonardLinsky, ‘Some Notes on Carnap's Concept of Intensional Isomorphism and the Paradox of Analysis’, Philosophy of Science 16 (1949), pp. 343–347.

    Google Scholar 

  25. LeonardLinsky (ed.), Reference and Modality, Oxford University Press, London, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  26. BensonMates, ‘Synonymity’, University of California Publications in Philosophy 25 (1950), pp. 201–226.

    Google Scholar 

  27. RichardMontague, ‘On the Nature of Certain Philosophical Entities’, The Monist 53 (1969), pp. 159–194.

    Google Scholar 

  28. JohnMyhill, ‘Problems Arising in the Formalization of Intensional Logic’, Logique et Analyse 1 (1958), pp. 78–83.

    Google Scholar 

  29. JohnMyhill, ‘An Alternative to the Method of Intension and Extension’, in Paul A.Schilpp (ed.), The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, Open Court, LaSalle, Illinois, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  30. RobertNozick, Philosophical Explanations, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  31. JosephOwens, ‘Synonymy and the Nonindividualistic Model of the Mental’, Synthese 66 (1986), pp. 361–382.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Mario Pieri, ‘Sur la géométrie envisagée comme un système purement logique’, 1 er Congres International de Philosophie, Tome 3, Paris, 1900.

  33. W. V. O.Quine, Word and Object, John Wiley and Sons, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  34. W. V. O.Quine, ‘Reference and Modality’, in From a Logical Point of View, Harper and Row, New York, 1961. Reprinted in [25].

    Google Scholar 

  35. W. V. O.Quine, ‘Quantifiers and Propositional Attitudes’, in The Ways of Paradox, Random House, New York, 1966. Reprinted in [25].

    Google Scholar 

  36. Frank P.Ramsey, ‘Universals’ in Foundations. Essays in Philosophy, Logic, Mathematics and Economics, D. H.Mellor (ed.), Humanities Press, Atlantic Highlands, New Jersey, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  37. BertrandRussell, Principles of Mathematics, W. W. Norton & Co., Inc., New York, 1938; first published 1903.

    Google Scholar 

  38. BertrandRussell, ‘The Philosophy of Logical Atomism’ in Logic and Knowledge, Robert C.Marsh (ed.), George Allen & Unwin, London, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  39. ErnestSosa, ‘Classical Analysis’, The Journal of Philosophy 80 (1983), pp. 695–710.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. JohnWallace, ‘Belief and Satisfaction’, Noûs 6 (1972), pp. 85–95.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Alfred North Whitehead and Bertrand Russell, Pricipia Mathematica, Volume I, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1910.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anderson, C.A. Bealer's Quality and concept . J Philos Logic 16, 115–164 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00257837

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00257837

Navigation