Summary
Changes in infiltration and runoff caused by pitting and mulching under sprinkler irrigation were studied on two soil types. Pitting or diking was done with an implement called a “dammer-diker”. Five soil treatments were applied: shallow and deep “dammer-diker”, shallow “dammer-diker” with mulch, bare, and a mulched soil, combined with two water application rates. Total water infiltration and runoff varied during the experiment. Runoff decreased with area of water storage provided by the pits and the less water was applied. Mulch treatments also reduced runoff. Surface water storage decreased during the season. Changes in soil physical properties due to pitting were more important in controlling runoff than surface water storage.
The effective saturated hydraulic conductivity of the soil progressively decreased through the season for all soil treatments and water application rates.
A model was developed to simulate the effect of pits on runoff. On a silt loam soil, simulated percent runoff and accumulated runoff over time for the bare and pitted treatments agreed closely to measured values. The agreement of simulated to measured runoff for a silty clay loam soil was not as good probably because of cracking which the simulation model did not take into account.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brooks RH, Corey AT (1964) Hydraulic properties of porous media. Color State Univ (Fort Collins) Hydrol Pap 3
Hanks RJ, Ashcroft GL (1980) Applied soil physics. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
Hanks RJ, Klute A, Bresler E (1969) A numeric method for estimating infiltration, redistribution, drainage, and evaporation of water from soil. Water Resour Res 5:1064
Hanks RJ, Keller J, Rasmussen VP, Wilson GD (1976) Line source sprinkler for continuous variable irrigation-crop production studies. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 40:426
Hawkins RH (1981) Interpretations of source area variability in Rainfall-Runoff Modeling. Mississippi, Ms. 18–21 May. Water Resour Publ Littleton, CO
Hillel D, Gardner WR (1970) Transient infiltration into crust-topped profiles. Soil Sci 109:69
Morin J, Benyamini Y, Michaeli A (1981) The effect of raindrop impact on the dynamics of soil surface crusting and water movement in the profile. J Hydrol 52:321
Mostafazadehfard B (1982) Furrow geometry and roughness under surge and continuous flow. M.S. Thesis, Utah State Univ, Logan, UT
Oliveira CAS (1986) Influence of diking and mulch soil surface treatments on infiltration and runoff as affected by irrigation. Ph.D. Dissertation. Utah State Univ, Logan, UT
Shani U, Hanks JR, Bresler E, Oliveira CAS. A simple field method for estimating the hydraulic conductivity and matric potential water content relations of soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J (in press)
Singer MJ, Matsuda Y, Blackard J (1981) Effect of mulch rate on soil loss by raindrop splash. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 45:107
Stillmunkes RT, James LG (1982) Impact energy of water droplets from irrigation sprinklers. Trans ASAE 225(1):130
Swartzendruber D, Hillel D (1975) Infiltration and runoff for small field plots under constant intensity rainfall. Water Resour Res 11(3):445
Tackett JL, Pearson RW (1965) Some characteristics of soil crusts formed by simulated rainfall. Soil Sci 99(6):407
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Oliveira, C.A.S., Hanks, R.J. & Shani, U. Infiltration and runoff as affected by pitting, mulching and sprinkler irrigation. Irrig Sci 8, 49–64 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00256815
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00256815