Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of the acute hemodynamic effects of nifedipine and nisoldipine in patients with ischemic reduced left ventricular function

  • Published:
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nisoldipine (BAY k 5552) like nifedipine, is a dihidropyridine compound with strong calcium blocking activity. The purpose of this study was to measure and compare the absolute hemodynamic effects of these two drugs before and at 30 min, 60 min and 120 min after oral intake in 20 ischemic heart disease patients with radionuclide gated cardiac scintigraphy. No significant change was seen in end diastolic volume index with either of the drugs. With nifedipine the stroke volume index (SVI) increased significantly from the basal value at 30 min (P=0.004) and 60 min (P=0.034) yet not significantly at 120 min. The same trend was seen in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) with significant increases at 30 min (P=0.02) and 60 min (P=0.025) yet not at 120 min. The cardiac index increased significantly at 30 min (P=0.001), 60 min (P=0.002) and 120 min (P=0.025) but the latter value was significantly lower than the 30 min value indicating the maximal effect had already passed. With nisoldipine the SVI increased significantly at 60 min (P=0.004) and 120 min (P=0.001) but not at 30 min. These changes were again reflected by a significant increase in LVEF at 60 min (P=0.021) and 120 min (P=0.002) without significant increase at 30 min. The increase in CI was highly significant at 60 min (P=0.003) and 120 min (P=0.001) without significant change at 30 min. Nisoldipine proved to be a potent calcium antagonist with slower onset and longer duration of action than nifedipine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Camerini F, Alberti E, Benussi B, Fioretti P, Klugmann S, Salvi A (1983) Nifedipine as an afterload reducing agent. In: Kaltenbach M, Neufeld HN (eds) Fifth International Adalat® Symposium. Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam, p 64

    Google Scholar 

  • Esper RJ, Caprarella M, Marcos RM, Lythgoe M (1980) Echophonocardiographic assessment of the effect of the vasodilator nifedipine and the -blocking agent acebutolol, separately and simultaneously on the heart. In: Puech P, Krebs R (eds) Fourth International Adalat® Symposium. Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam, p 154

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayase S, Hirakawa S, Hosokawa S, Mori N, Ito H, Iwasa M, Kanyama S, Watanabe I, Hiei K, Banno S (1973) Therapeutic efficacy, clinical and basic hemodynamic studies on nifedipine. In: Hashimoto K, Kimura E, Kobayashi T (eds) First International Adalat® Symposium, University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, p 77

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbst CP, van Aswegen A, Kleynhans PHT, Otto AC, Lötter MG, Minnaar PC (1986) Radionuclide determination of absolute LV volumes: interstudy, interobserver and intraobserver variances. Nucl Med Biol 13:43–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Links JM, Becker LC, Schindledecker JG, Guzman P, Burow RD, Nickoloff EL, Alderson PD, Wagner HN (1982), Measurement of absolute left ventricular volume from gated blood pool studies. Circulation 65:82–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Low RI, Takeda P, Mason DT (1982) The effects of calcium chanel blocking agents on cardiovascular function. Am J Cardiol 49:547–553

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsumoto S, Ito T, Sada T, Takahashi M, Su K, Ueda A, Okabe F, Sato M, Sekine I (1980) Hemodynamic effects of nifedipine in congestive heart failure. Am J Cardiol 46:476–480

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Herbst, C.P., Otto, A.C., van Aswegen, A. et al. A comparison of the acute hemodynamic effects of nifedipine and nisoldipine in patients with ischemic reduced left ventricular function. Eur J Nucl Med 13, 72–75 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00256019

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00256019

Key words

Navigation