Skip to main content
Log in

Reliability of lymphography as a diagnostic aid in the planning of treatment for bladder carcinoma

  • Originals
  • Published:
Urological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

To assess the accuracy of lymphography, 90 lymphograms were compared with surgical and histological findings. Histological correlation with the initial report was found in 65 of 90 cases (72%). Comparison of the original radiologist's report with a recent re-examination showed agreement between the two radiological evaluations in only 74%. Although improvement in diagnostic accuracy can perhaps be obtained, we cannot yet recommend lymphography as an aid in the planning of treatment for bladder carcinoma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Camey, M., le Duc, A., Khoury, S.: Intérêt de la lymphographie dans l'exploration du cancer de la vessie. Journal d'Urologie et de Nephrologie 79, 370 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dretler, S. P., Ragsdale, B. D., Leadbetter, W. F.: The value of pelvic lymphadenectomy in the surgical treatment of bladder cancer. Journal of Urology 109, 414 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Farah, R. N., Cerny, J. C.: Lymphangiography in staging patients with carcinoma of the bladder. Journal of Urology 119, 40 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Grasset, D., Navratil, H.: Limites de la lymphographie dans le diagnostic de l'extension ganglionnaire des cancers vésicaux. Journal d'Urologie et de Nephrologie 79, 369 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Johnson, D. E., Kaesler, K. E., Kaminsky, S., Jing, B. S., Wallace, S.: Lymphangiography as an aid in staging bladder carcinoma. Southern Medical Journal 69, 28 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Laplante, M., Brice, M.: The upper limits of hopeful application of radical cystectomy for vesical carcinoma: Does nodal metastases always indicate incurability? Journal of Urology 109, 261 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Merrin, C., Wajsman, Z., Baumgartner, G., Jennings, E.: Clinical value of lymphangiography: are nodes surrounding obturator nerve visualised? Journal of Urology 117, 762 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Prout, G. R.: The surgical management of bladder carcinoma. Urologic Clinics of North America 3, 149 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Reid, E. C., Oliver, J. A., Fishman, I. J.: Preoperative irradiation and cystectomy in 135 cases of bladder cancer. Urology 8, 247 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Turner, A. G., Hendry, W. F., MacDonald, J. S., Wallace, D. M.: The value of lymphography in the management of bladder cancer. British Journal of Urology 48, 579 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Union Internationale contre le Cancer. TNM, Classification of malignant tumours. 2e ed. Geneva, UICC 1974

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wajsman, Z., Baumgartner, G., Murphy, G. P., Merrin, C.: Evaluation of lymphangiography for clinical staging of bladder tumors. Journal of Urology 114, 712 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wallace, D. M., Bloom, H. J. G.: The management of deeply infiltrating (T3) bladder carcinoma: controlled trial of radical radiotherapy versus pre-operative radiotherapy and radical cystectomy. (First report). British Journal of Urology 48, 587 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Whitmore, W. F.: Total cystectomy. In: The biology and clinical management of bladder cancer. Cooper, E. H., Williams, R. E. (eds.). Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications 1975

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Essed, E., Mulder, J.D. Reliability of lymphography as a diagnostic aid in the planning of treatment for bladder carcinoma. Urol. Res. 7, 93–96 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00254687

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00254687

Key words

Navigation