Abstract
The aim of this prospective study was to compare the results obtained with the non-protected lower respiratory tract secretions samples (LRS) with the protected specimen brushes (PSB) performed through a fiberoptic bronchoscope in mechanically ventilated patients, when pneumonia was suspected. The diagnosis of pneumonia was ultimately made at the end of the hospitalisation, in a double-blind manner by 2 members of the medical staff not aware of the bacteriologic results of LRS and PSB. LRS and PSB were performed in 24 patients. PSB culture was considered as positive at a level of 103 colony-forming units per milliliter (cfu/ml) microorganisms. Twentyfive samples from 24 patients were divided as follows: (1) LRS (-) and PSB (-) 5 samples: the clinical diagnosis of pneumonia was never established. (2) LRS (+) and PSB (+) 10 samples: the clinical diagnosis of pneumonia was always established, 2 microorganisms were involved 4 times and 1 microorganism 6 times. (3) LRS (+) and PSB (-) 10 samples: the clinical diagnosis of pneumonia was retained in 3 with the possibility of false negative PSB. We conclude that (1) a negative LRS eliminated the diagnosis of pneumonia without PSB; (2) a positive LRS was not sufficient to diagnose pneumonia since PSB was negative in 50% of all LRS (+) cases; (3) the possibility of a false negative PSB must be kept in mind particularly in patients previously treated with antibiotics; (4) 2 microorganisms may be responsible for the pneumonia if the previously determined, as significant, bacteriological count (>-103 cfu/ml) appears to be accurate.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrews CP, Coalson JJ, Smith JD, Johanson WG (1981) Diagnosis of nosocomial bacterial pneumonia in acute, diffuse lung injury. Chest 80:254
Davidson M, Tempest B, Palmer DL (1976) Bacteriologic diagnosis of acute pneumonia comparison of sputum, transtracheal aspirates and lung aspirates. JAMA 235:158
Matthew EB, Holstrom FM, Kaspar RL (1977) A simple method for diagnosing pneumonia in intubated or tracheostomized patients. Crit Care Med 5:76
Wimberley N, Faling LJ, Bartlett JG (1979) A fiberoptic bronchoscopy technique to obtain uncontaminated lower airway secretions for bacterial culture. Am Rev Respir Dis 119:337
Higuchi JH, Coalson JJ, Johanson WG (1982) Bacteriologic diagnosis of nosocomial pneumonia in primates. Usefulness of the protected specimen brush. Am Rev Respir Dis 125:53
Chastre J, Viau F, Brun P, Pierre J, Dauge MC, Bouchama A, Akesbi A, Gibert C (1984) Prospective evaluation of the protected specimen brush for the diagnosis of pulmonary infections in ventilated patients. Am Rev Respir Dis 130:924
Wimberley NW, Bass JB, Boyd BW, Kirkpatrick MB, Serio RA Pollock HM (1982) Use of a bronchoscopic protected catheter brush for the diagnosis of pulmonary infections. Chest 81:557
Teague RB, Wallale RJ, Awe RJ (1981) The use of quantitative sterile brush culture and gram stain analysis in the diagnosis of lower respiratory tract infection. Chest 79:157
Palmer DL (1984) Microbiology of pneumonia in the patient at risk. Am J Med 76:53
Laforce FM, Eickoff TC (1977) The role of infection in critical care. Anesthesiology 47:195
Johanson WG, Pierce AK, Sanford JP, Thomas GD (1972) Nosocomial respiratory infections with gram negative bacilli: the significance of colonization of the respiratory tract. Ann Intern Med 77:701
Tillotson JR, Finland M (1969) Bacterial colonization and clinical superinfection of the respiratory tract complicating antibiotic treatment of pneumonia. J Infect Dis 119:597
Bryant LR, Trinkle JK, Mobin-Uddin K, Baker J, Griffen WO (1972) Bacterial colonization profile with tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation. Arch Surg 104:647
Regnier B, Witchitz JL, Petitpretz P, Laisne MJ, Prokocimer P (1982) Interêt du prélèvement bronchique distal pour la diagnostic des pneumopathies bactériennes chez les malades intubés ou trachéotomisés. In: Etats infectieux graves en réanimation. Expansion Scientifique Française, Paris, pp 85–90
Pollock HM, Hawkins EL, Bonner JR, Sparkman T, Bass JB (1983) Diagnosis of bacterial pulmonary infections with quantitative protected catheter cultures obtained during bronchoscopy. J Clin Microbiol 17:255
Bartlett JG, Alexander J, Mayhew J, Sullivan Sigler N, Gorbach SL (1976) Should fiberoptic bronchoscopy aspirates be cultured. Am Rev Respir Dis 114:73
Joshi JH, Wang KP, De Jongh CA, Newman KA, Wiernik PH, Schimpff SC (1982) A comparative evaluation of two fiberoptic bronchoscopy catheters: the plugged telescoping catheter versus the single sheathed non-plugged catheter. Am Rev Respir Dis 126:860
Villers D, Derriennic MD, Raffi F, Gerhaud P, Baron D, Nicolas F, Courtieu AL (1985) Reliability of the bronchoscopic protected catheter brush in intubated and ventilated patients. Chest 88:527
Jay SJ (1983) Nosocomial infections. Med Clin North Am 67:1251
Laforce FM (1981) Hospital acquired gram negative rod pneumonias: an overview. Am J Med 70:664
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Richard, C., Pezzano, M., Bouhaja, B. et al. Comparison of non-protected lower respiratory tract secretions and protected specimen brush samples in the diagnosis of pneumonia. Intensive Care Med 14, 30–33 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00254118
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00254118