Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 76, Issue 1, pp 213–222 | Cite as

Alteration of proprioceptive messages induced by tendon vibration in man: a microneurographic study

  • J. P. Roll
  • J. P. Vedel
  • E. Ribot


The activities of single proprioceptive fibres were recorded from the lateral peroneal nerve using transcutaneously implanted tungsten microelectrodes. Unitary discharges originating from muscle spindle primary and secondary endings and Golgi tendon organs were identified by means of various physiological tests. The sensitivity of proprioceptors to mechanical vibrations with a constant low amplitude (0.2–0.5 mm) applied at various frequencies to the tendon of the receptor-bearing muscle was studied. Muscle spindle primary endings (Ia fibres) were found to be the most sensitive to this mechanical stimulus. In some cases their discharge could be driven in a one-to-one manner up to 180 Hz. Most of them also fired harmonically with the vibration up to 80 Hz and then discharged in a subharmonic manner (1/2–1/3) with increasing vibration frequencies. Muscle spindle secondary endings (II fibres) and Golgi tendon organs (Ib fibres) were found to be either insensitive or only slightly sensitive to tendon vibration in relaxed muscles. The effects of tendon vibration on muscle spindle sensory endings response to muscle lengthening and shortening induced by imposed constant velocity or sinusoidal movements of the ankle joint were studied. Modulation of the proprioceptive discharge frequency coding the various joint movement parameters was either completely or partly masked by the receptor response to vibration, depending on the vibration frequency. Moreover, vibrations combined with sinusoidal joint movements elicited quantitatively erroneous proprioceptive messages concerning the movement parameters (amplitude, velocity). The sensitivity of the Golgi tendon organs to vibration increased greatly when the receptor-bearing muscle was tonically contracted. These data confirm that vibration is able to preferentially activate the Ia afferent channel, even when the vibration amplitude is low. They define the frequency sensitivity of the muscle spindle primary and secondary endings and the Golgi tendon organs. They also show that the physiological messages triggered by ongoing motor activities undergo a series of changes during the exposure of muscles to vibration.

Key words

Muscle spindle Golgi tendon organs Vibration Movement Microneurography 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Brown MC, Engberg I, Matthews PBC (1967) The relative sensitivity to vibration of muscle receptors in the cat. J Physiol 192: 773–800Google Scholar
  2. Burke D, Hagbarth KE, Lofstedt L, Wallin BG (1976a) The responses of human muscle spindle endings to vibration of non-contracting muscles. J Physiol 261: 673–693Google Scholar
  3. Burke D, Hagbarth KE, Lofstedt L, Wallin BG (1976b) The responses of human muscle spindle endings to vibration during isometric contraction. J Physiol 261: 695–711Google Scholar
  4. Capaday C, Cooke JD (1981) The effects of muscle vibration on the attainment of intended final position during voluntary human arm movements. Exp Brain Res 52: 139–146Google Scholar
  5. Clark FJ, Matthews PBC, Muir RB (1981) Response of soleus Ia afferents to vibration in the presence of the tonic vibration reflex in the decerebrate cat. J Physiol 311: 97–112Google Scholar
  6. Eklund G (1972) Position sense and state of contraction; the effects of vibration. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat 35: 606–611Google Scholar
  7. Gilhodes JC, Roll JP, Tardy-Gervet MF (1986) Perceptual and motor effects of agonist-antagonist muscle vibration in man. Exp Brain Res 61: 395–402Google Scholar
  8. Goodwin GM, Mc Closkey DI, Matthews PBC (1972) The contribution of muscle afferents to kinaesthesia shown by vibration induced illusions of movement and by the effects of paralysing joint afferents. Brain 95: 705–748Google Scholar
  9. Hagbarth KE (1973) The effects of muscle vibration in normal man and in patients with motor disorders. In: Desmedt JE (ed) New developments in EMG and clinical neurophysiology, Vol 3. Karger, Basel, pp 428–443Google Scholar
  10. Hulliger M (1984) The mammalian muscle spindle and it's central control. Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol 101: 1–110Google Scholar
  11. Jami L, Petit J, Proske U, Zytnicki D (1985) Responses of tendon organs to unfused contractions of single motor units. J Neurophysiol 53: 32–42Google Scholar
  12. Lewis CH, Griffin MJ (1976) The effects of vibration on manual control performance. Ergonomics 19: 203–216Google Scholar
  13. Martin B, Gauthier GM, Roll JP, Hugon M, Harlay F (1980) Effects of whole body vibration on standing posture in man. Aviat Space Environ Med 51: 778–787Google Scholar
  14. Matthews PBC (1972) Mammalian muscle receptors and their central action. Arnold, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Matthews PBC, Watson JDG (1981) Action of vibration on the response of cat muscle spindle Ia afferents to low frequency sinusoidal stretching. J Physiol 317: 365–381Google Scholar
  16. Mc Closkey DI (1973) Differences between the sense of movement and position shown by the effects of loading and vibration of muscles in man. Brain Res 61: 119–131Google Scholar
  17. Mc Grath GJ, Matthews PBC (1973) Evidence from the use of vibration during procaine nerve block that the spindle group II fibers contribute excitation to the tonic stretch reflex of the decerebrate cat. J Physiol 235: 371–408Google Scholar
  18. Prochazka A, Hulliger M (1983) Muscle afferent function and its significance for motor control mechanisms during voluntary movements in cat, monkey and man. In: Desmedt JE (ed) Motor control mechanisms in health and disease. Raven Press, New York, pp 93–132Google Scholar
  19. Proske U (1981) The Golgi tendon organ.Properties of the receptor and reflex actions of impulses arising from tendon organ. Int Rev Physiol 25: 127–171Google Scholar
  20. Ribot E, Roll JP, Gauthier GM (1986) Comparative effects of whole body vibration on sensorimotor performance achieved with a mini-stick and a macro-stick in force and position control modes. Aviat Space Environ Med 57: 792–799Google Scholar
  21. Roll JP, Vedel JP (1982) Kinaesthetic role of muscle afferents in man, studied by tendon vibration and microneurography. Exp Brain Res 47: 177–190Google Scholar
  22. Roll JP, Roll R (1987) Kinaesthetic and motor effects of extraocular vibration in Man. In: O'Regan JK, Levy-Schoen A (eds) Eye movements: from physiology to cognition. Elsevier, North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 57–68Google Scholar
  23. Roll JP, Martin B, Gauthier GM, Mussa-Ivaldi F (1980) Effects of whole-body vibration on spinal reflexes in man. Aviat Space Environ Med 51: 1227–1233Google Scholar
  24. Sittig AC, Denier van der Gon JJ, Gielen CCAM (1987) The contribution of afferent information on position and velocity to the control of slow and fast human forearm movements. Exp Brain Res 67: 33–40Google Scholar
  25. Vallbo AB, Hagbarth KE, Torebjork H, Wallin BG (1979) Somatosensory, proprioceptive and sympathetic activity in human peripheral nerves. Physiol Rev 59: 919–957Google Scholar
  26. Vedel JP, Roll JP (1983) Muscle spindle contribution to the coding of motor activities in man. In: Massion J, Paillard J, Schultz W, Wiesendanger M (eds) Neural coding of motor performance. Exp Brain Res Suppl 7: 253–265Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. P. Roll
    • 1
  • J. P. Vedel
    • 2
  • E. Ribot
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire de Neurobiologie Humaine, URA CNRS 372Marseille Cedex 13France
  2. 2.Laboratoire de Neurosciences FonctionnellesCNRSMarseille Cedex 9France

Personalised recommendations