Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical differences between bone-seeking agents

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Pauwels EKJ, Blom J, Camps JAJ, Hermans J, Rijke AM (1983) A comparison between the diagnostic efficacy of 99mTc-MDP, 99mTc-DPD and 99mTc-HDP for the detection of bone metastases. Eur J Nucl Med 8:118–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroth HJ, Hausinger F, Garth H, Oberhausen E (1984) Comparison of the kinetics of methylene-diphosphonate (MDP) and dicarboxypropane-diphosphonic acid (DPD), two radio-diagnostics for bone scintigraphy. Eur J Nucl Med 9:529–532

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Duzee BF, Schaefer JA, Ball JD, Chilton HM, Cowan RJ, Kuni C, Trow R, Watson NE (1984) Relative lesion detection ability of Tc-99m HMDP and Tc-99m MDP: Concise communication. J Nucl Med 25:166–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Vorne M, Vähätalo S, Lantto T (1983) A clinical comparison of Tc-99m DPD and two Tc-99m MDP agents. Eur J Nucl Med 8:395–397

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arndt, J.W., Pauwels, E.K.J., Camps, J.A.J. et al. Clinical differences between bone-seeking agents. Eur J Nucl Med 11, 330 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00252349

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00252349

Keywords

Navigation