Abstract
Twenty patients underwent gated synchronized 201Tl myocardial scanning (TMS). Twelve also performed a rest blood pool multigated acquisition (MUGA) study. A ‘static’ image was obtained by adding all the gated frames of the study. In this way we found the conventional static study quite unnecessary.
Comparing the gated TMS to the static one revealed significantly improved resolution in the gated images and additional information concerning wall motion and myocardial thickness. Close agreement was found with results of MUGA studies of the same patients.
By the addition of diastolic frames the imaging time needed to obtain improved image quality was found to be not more than 10 min per view. The exclusion of imaging time as a limiting factor for gated TMS is stressed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alderson RO, Wagner HN, Gomez-Moeiras JS, Rehm TG, Becher LC, Douglas KH, Manspeaker HF, Schindledecker GR (1978) Simultaneous detection of myocardial perfusion and wall motion by cinematic 201Tl imaging. Radiology 127:531–533
Botvinick EH, Dunn RF, Hattner RS, Massie BM (1980) Consideration of factors affecting the diagnostic accuracy of thallium-201 myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in detecting coronary artery disease. Semin Nucl Med 10:157–167
Garty I, Kardontchick A (1984) Gated 201Tl and blood pool (MUGA) scintigraphy. A comparative study (to be published)
Hamilton GW, Narahara KA, Trobaugh GB, Ritchie JL, Williams DL (1978) Thallium-201 myocardial imaging: Characterization of the ECG synchronized images. J Nucl Med 19:1103–1110
Lebowitz E, Greene MN, Bradley Moor P, Atkins H, Ansari A, Richards P, Belgrave E (1973) 201Tl medical use. J Nucl Med 14:421–422
Leppo AJ, Schener J, Pohost MG, Freeman LM, Strauss HW (1980) The evaluation of ischemic heart disease thallium 201 with comment on radionuclide angiography. Semin Nucl Med 10:115–126
McKillop JH, Fawcett D, Baumert J, Ross MC, Dougall I, DeBusk RF, Harrison DC, Goris ML (1981) ECG gating of thallium 201 myocardial images: Effect in detection of ischemic heart disease. J Nucl Med 22:219–225
Pohost MG, Alpert NM, Ingwall JS, Strauss HW (1980) Thallium redistribution: Mechanisms and clinical utility. Semin Nucl Med 10:70–93
Strauss HW, Harrison K, Langan JK, Lebowitz E, Pitt B (1975) Thallium 201 for myocardial imaging. Relation of thallium 201 to regional myocardial perfusion. Circulation 51:641–645
Trobaugh GB, Wackers FJ, Sokole EB, De Roven TA, Ritchie JL, Hamilton GW (1978) Thallium 201 myocardial imaging: An interinstitutional study of observer variability. J Nucl Med 19:359–363
Verani MS, Marcus ML, Razzak MA, Ehrhardt JC (1978) Sensitivity and specificity of thallium 201 perfusion scintigrams under exercise in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. J Nucl Med 19:773–782
Verani MS (1983) Thallium 201 myocardial scintigraphy: An overview. Clin Nucl Med 8:276–287
Wackers FJ Th (1980) Thallium 201 myocardial scintigraphy in acute myocardial infarction and ischemia. Semin Nucl Med 10:127–145
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Garty, I., Kardontchik, A. Study of ECG-gated thallium-201 myocardial scintigraphy: Is imaging time a limiting factor?. Eur J Nucl Med 9, 173–176 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00251466
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00251466