Skip to main content
Log in

Irrigation for crops in a sub-humid environment

V. Stress Day Analysis for Soybeans and an Economic Evaluation of Strategies

  • Published:
Irrigation Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A water balance model, incorporating the influence of water deficit during vegetative growth on depth of water extraction, was used to calculate stress days from soybean irrigation experiments. A stress day was defined as a day when soil water deficit exceeded 60% of the capacity of the current root zone. Using data from 17 experimental treatments the influence of water deficits on yield and leaf area were ascertained. Soybeans were most sensitive to water stress during flowering and pod filling, and stress just prior to and during flowering increased the effect of stress during pod filling. For example, in the cultivar Ruse, stress during pod filling reduced yield by 21 kg ha−1 (stress day)−1 if there was no previous stress. If there had been 10 days of stress during vegetative growth, yield in pod filling was reduced by 52 kg ha−1 (stress day)−1. Yield was expressed as a function of stress days. Using this function and past meteorological data in the water balance model, it was found by simulation that from an allocation of 960 thousand cubic meters of water, the greatest yields were obtained by growing 100 ha of soybeans and irrigating at 60% soil water deficit. With progressively larger areas the water allocation was exhausted before the end of the season in an increasing number of years. However, the larger area compensated for the reduced yield and net returns averaged over 20 years were greatest when 160 ha were grown. Increasing the deficit for irrigation in order to make the water last longer increased the yield in dry years when the allocation was exhausted prematurely, but when averaged over 20 years, this effect was outweighed by loss of yield in the other years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boyer JS (1970) Cell enlargement and metabolic rates in corn, soybean and sunflower at various leaf water potentials. Plant Physiol 46:233

    Google Scholar 

  • Burch GJ, Smith RCG, Mason WK (1978) Agronomic and physiological responses of soybean and sorghum crops to water deficits. II. Crop evaporation, soil water depletion and root distribution. Aust J Plant Physiol 5:169

    Google Scholar 

  • Constable GA, Hearn AB (1978) Agronomic and physiological responses of soybean and sorghum crops to water deficits. I. Growth, development and yield. Aust J Plant Physiol 5:159

    Google Scholar 

  • Constable GA, Hearn AB (1980) Irrigation for crops in a sub-humid environment. I. The effect of irrigation on the growth and yield of soybeans Irrig Sci 2:1

    Google Scholar 

  • Cull PO, Smith RCG, McCaffery K (1981) Irrigation scheduling of cotton in a climate with uncertain rainfall. II. Development and application of a model for irrigation scheduling. Irrig Sci 2:141

    Google Scholar 

  • De Bruyn LP, De Jager JM (1978) A meteorological approach to the identification of drought sensitive periods in field crops. Agric Meteorol 19:35–40

    Google Scholar 

  • List RJ (1966) Smithsonian meteorological tables. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, p 418

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason WK (1979) The irrigation scheduling of soybeans. Ph D Thesis, University of New England Armidale Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason WK, Counstable GA, Smith RCG (1980) Irrigation for crops in a sub-humid environment. II. Water requirements of soybeans. Irrig Sci 2:13

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mason WK, Smith RCG (1981a) Irrigation for crops in a sub-humid environment. III. An irrigation scheduling model for predicting soybeans water use and crop yield. Irrig Sci 2:89

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason WK, Smith RCG (1981b) Irrigation for crops in a sub-humid environment. IV. Analysis of current irrigation practice of soybeans and the potential for improved efficiency. Irrig Sci 2:103

    Google Scholar 

  • Priestly LHB, Taylor RJ (1972) On the assessment of surface heat flux and evaporation using large-scale parameters. Mon Weather Rev 100:81

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawson HM, Turner NC, Begg JE (1978) Agronomic and physiological responses of soybean and sorghum crops to water deficits. III. Photosynthesis, transpiration and water use efficiency of leaves. Aust J Plant Physiol 5:195

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie JT (1972) Model for predicting evaporation from a row crop with incomplete cover. Water Resour Res 8:1204

    Google Scholar 

  • Shibles RM, Anderson IC, Gibson AH (1975) Soybeans. In: Evans LT (ed) Crop physiology: Some case histories. Cambridge University Press, London New York, p 151–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner NC, Begg JE, Rawson HM, English SD, Hearn AB (1978) Agronomic and physiological responses of soybean and sorghum crops to water deficits. III. Components of leaf water potential, leaf conductance, 14CO 2photosynthesis, and adaptation to water deficits. Aust J Plant Physiol 5:179

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hearn, A.B., Constable, G.A. Irrigation for crops in a sub-humid environment. Irrig Sci 3, 1–15 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00251379

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00251379

Keywords

Navigation