Skip to main content
Log in

In situ comparison of diffusivities for hydrogen and deuterium in palladium

  • Papers
  • Published:
Journal of Applied Electrochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An electrochemical permeation method was employed to study the diffusion behaviour of hydrogen and deuterium in palladium. Solutions of 0.1 m LiOD (in D2O) and 0.1 m LiOH (in H2O) and their mixtures were used as the catholytes. More than one hundred diffusivity data from 20 palladium membranes were collected. Statistical analysis of these data was made to examine the validity of the reversed isotope dependence for hydrogen diffusion in palladium. It was concluded that the effective diffusivities increased with the concentration of deuterium in the electrolyte. In addition, an in situ experiment was also performed by adding to the cathodic cell an equivalent amount of LiOD solution to the original LiOH solution, or vice versa. Graphical comparison of the corresponding permeation transients showed that the permeation rate increased when deuterium was added to the solution of H2O, and the rate decreased when hydrogen was added to the solution of D2O. This constitutes direct evidence for the higher diffusivity of deuterium than that of hydrogen in palladium.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. C. Wert and C. Zener, Phys. Rev. 76 (1949) 1169.

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. H. Vineyard, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 3 (1957) 121.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Y. Fukai and H. Sugimoto, Adv. Phys. 34 (1985) 263.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Amano and D. N. Seidman, J. Appl. Phys. 56 (1984) 983.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. J. Kumnick and H. H. Johnson, Acta Metall. 25 (1977) 891.

    Google Scholar 

  6. N. R. Quick and H. H. Johnson, Metall. Trans. 10A (1979) 67.

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. Schaumann, J. Volkl and G. Alefeld, Phys. Stat. Sol. 42 (1970) 401.

    Google Scholar 

  8. G. Bomholdt and E. Wicke, Z. Physik. Chem. N.F. 56 (1967) 133.

    Google Scholar 

  9. G. Holleck and E. Wicke, ibid. 56 (1967) 155.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. Volkl, G. Wollenweber, K.-H. Klatt and G. Alefeld, Z. Naturforsch. 26a (1971) 922.

    Google Scholar 

  11. S. Majorowski and B. Baranowski, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 43 (1982) 1119.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. A. V. Devanathan and Z. Stachurski, Proc. Royal Soc. A270 (1962) 90.

    Google Scholar 

  13. C. L. Yu and T. P. Perng, Acta Metall. Mater. 39 (1991) 1091.

    Google Scholar 

  14. C. J. Lihn, C. C. Wan, C. M. Wan and T. P. Perng, Fusion Technol., in press.

  15. J. McBreen, L. Nanis and W. Beck, J. Electrochem. Soc. 113 (1966) 1218.

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. Czerwinski and R. Marassi, J. Electroanal. Chem. 322 (1992) 373.

    Google Scholar 

  17. E. Storms and C. Talcott-Storms, Fusion Technol. 20 (1991) 246.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ted B. Flanagan, J. F. Lynch, J. D. Clewley and B. Von Turkovich, J. Less Common Metals 49 (1976) 13.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lihn, C.J., Wan, C.C. & Perng, T.P. In situ comparison of diffusivities for hydrogen and deuterium in palladium. J Appl Electrochem 25, 61–67 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00251266

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00251266

Keywords

Navigation