Skip to main content
Log in

Prenatal aqueductal stenosis as a cuase of congenital hydrocephalus in the inbred at LEW/Jms

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We studied the microscopic morphological changes in congenital hydrocephalus in the inbred rat, LEW/Jms, on gestational days 17, 18, and 20 and during the neonatal period to clarify the etiopathogenesis, focusing particularly on the aqueductal changes. At 1 day of age, ventriculomegaly was limited to the lateral and III ventricles, and the aqueduct was obstructed, with the appearance of simple stenosis. On gestational days 20 and 18, the hydrocephalic rats showed occluded aqueducts, which paralleled the finding of hydrocephalus in the newborn rats. On gestational day 17, all eight models examined showed the same size ventricles. However, an aqueductal obstruction was observed in one of them. The other seven rats showed the aqueduct patent. From these observations, it can be concluded that the rat shows an aqueductal obstruction on gestational day 17 and appears to develop hydrocephalus with age. The aqueductal obstruction was considered to be the primary change and not a secondary phenomenon. The site of obstruction was the anterior part of the aqueduct (level of anterior colliculus) at every stage. Aqueductal obstruction following the developmental anomaly of the midbrain in the embryonic stage might thus be the primary cause of congenital hydrocephalus in rats LEW/Jms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adeloye A, Warkany J (1976) Experimental congenital hydrocephalus. A review with special consideration of hydrocephalus produced by zinc deficiency. Child's Brain 2:325–360

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aikawa H, Kobayashi S, Suzuki K (1986) Aqueductal lesions in 6-aminonicotinamide-treated suckling mice. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 71:243–250

    Google Scholar 

  3. Berry RJ (1961) The inheritance and pathogenesis of hydrocephalus-3 in the mouse. J Pathol Bacteriol 81:157–167

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bicker DS, Adams RD (1949) Hereditary stenosis of the aqueduct of Sylvius as a cause of congenital hydrocephalus. Brain 72:246–262

    Google Scholar 

  5. Borit A, Sidman RL (1972) New mutant mouse with communicating hydrocephalus and secondary aqueductal stenosis. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 21:316–331

    Google Scholar 

  6. D'Amato CJ, Oshea KS, Hicks SP, Glover RA, Annesley TM (1986) Genetic prenatal aqueductal stenosis with hydrocephalus in rat. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 45:665–682

    Google Scholar 

  7. Drachman DA, Richardson EP (1961) Aqueductal narrowing, congenital and acquired. Arch Neurol 5:552–559

    Google Scholar 

  8. Edwards JH, Norman RM, Roberts JM (1961) Sex-linked hydrocephalus. Report of a family with 15 affected members. Arch Dis Child 36:481–485

    Google Scholar 

  9. Green MC (1970) The developmental effects of congenital hydrocephalus (ch) in the mouse. Dev Biol 23:585–608

    Google Scholar 

  10. Higashi K, Asahisa H, Ueda N, Noda Y, Tashiro M (1984) An experimental model of congenital hydrocephalus in the rat. Shoni no Noshinkei (Jpn) 9:257–264

    Google Scholar 

  11. Holmes LB, Nash A, ZuRhein GM, Levin M, Opitz M (1963) X-linked aqueductal stenosis: clinical and neuropathological findings in two families. Pediatrics 63:1104–1110

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jellinger G (1986) Anatomopathology of non-tumoral aqueductal stenosis. J Neurosurg Sci 30:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kohn DF, Chinookoswong N, Chou SM (1981) A new model of congenital hydrocephalus in the rat. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 54:211–218

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Koto M, Miwa M, Shimizu A, Tsuji K, Okamato M, Adachi J (1987) Inherited hydrocephalus in Csk; Wister-Imamichi rats; Hyd strain: a new disease model for hydrocephalus. Jikken Dobutsu 36:157–162

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kristensson K, Leestma J, Lundh B, Norrby E (1984) Sendai virus infection in the mouse brain: virus spread and long-term effects. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 63:89–95

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nugent GR, Al Mefty O, Chou S (1979) Communicating hydrocephalus as a cause of aqueductal stenosis. J Neurosurg 51:812–818

    Google Scholar 

  17. Raimondi AJ, Clark SJ, McLone DG (1976) Pathogenesis of aqueductal occlusion in congenital murine hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 5:66–77

    Google Scholar 

  18. Richardson RR (1985) Congenital genetic murie (ch) hydrocephalus. Child's Nerv Syst 1:87–99

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sasaki S, Goto H, Nagano H, Furuya K, Omata Y, Kanazawa K, Suzuki K, Sudo K (1983) Congenital hydrocephalus revealed in the inbred rat LEW/Jms. Neurosurgery 13:548–554

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sato H (1986) Experimental congenital hydrocephalus. Pathogenetic processes in differentiating brain. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 26:11–18

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shibuta H, Adachi A, Kanda T, Shimada H (1978) Experimental parainfluenza virus infection. I. Hydrocephalus of mice due to infection with parainfluenza virus type 1 and 3. Microbiol Immunol 22:505–508

    Google Scholar 

  22. Stempark JG (1984) Etiology of trypan blue induced antenatal hydrocephalus in the albino rat. Anat Rec 148:561–571

    Google Scholar 

  23. Williams B (1973) Is aqueduct stenosis a result of hydrocephalus? Brain 96:399–412

    Google Scholar 

  24. Woollam DHM, Millen JW (1953) Anatomical consideration in the pathology of stenosis of the cerebral aqueduct. Brain 76:104–112

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yamada, H., Oi, S., Tamaki, N. et al. Prenatal aqueductal stenosis as a cuase of congenital hydrocephalus in the inbred at LEW/Jms. Child's Nerv Syst 7, 218–222 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00249399

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00249399

Key words

Navigation