Summary
During metamorphic and post-metamorphic life in the frog, Xenopus laevis, growth-related changes in skull shape produce radical alterations in the spatial relationship between the two eyes. These changes in binocular visual geometry were measured using optical techniques. Between the onset of metamorphic climax at stage 60 and adulthood (2 or more years post-metamorphosis) each eye migrates nasally by 55° and dorsally by 50° with respect to the major body axes of the animal. As a result the nasotemporal extent of the binocular visual field increases from 30° to 162° between these ages. Electrophysiological methods were used to determine changes in the neural representation of the binocular visual field at the paired midbrain optic tecta and in the tectal projection of pairs of corresponding retinal loci at various developmental points between these ages. The proportion of each tectal surface devoted to the representation of the binocular visual field increases from 11% at stage 60 to 77% at adulthood. Retinal correspondence, and hence the tectal projection of corresponding retinal loci, undergoes radical alteration during this period. In normal adults an intertectal system of connections selectively links the tectal projection of corresponding retinal loci and thus provides a neuronal mechanism for integrating binocular visual information in the optic tecta. Electrophysiological methods were used to determine how the intertectal system accommodates the developmental challenge posed by the enlarging binocular visual field and changing retinal correspondence. Between stage 60 and adulthood the ipsilateral visuotectal projection which is the product of the intertectal system, increases in size as the binocular visual field and its tectal representation enlarges. Moreover, throughout this period, it provides a mechanism for integrating binocular visual information in the optic tecta by maintaining its spatial registration with the contralateral visuotectal projection from the other eye. Analysis of the pattern of functional intertectal connections reveals that during the course of normal maturation this system undergoes continuous processes of expansion and of orderly and major remodelling.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beazley LD, Keating MJ, Gaze RM (1972) The appearance, during development, of responses in the optic tectum following visual stimulation of the ipsilateral eye in Xenopus laevis. Vision Res 12: 407–410
Bishop PO (1973) Neurophysiology of binocular single vision and stereopsis. In: Jung R (ed) Handbook of sensory physiology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 255–307
Bishop PO (1979) Stereopsis and the random element in the organisation of the striate cortex. Proc R Soc Lond [Biol] 204: 414–434
Collett T (1977) Stereopsis in toads. Nature 267: 349–351
Cook JE, Rankin ECC, Stevens HP (1983) A pattern of optic axons in the normal goldfish tectum consistent with the caudal migration of optic terminals during development. Exp Brain Res 52: 147–151
Deuchar EM (1975) The South African clawed frog. Wiley, London
Dunlop SA, Beazley LD (1984) A morphometric study of the retinal ganglion cell layer and optic nerve from metamorphosis in Xenopus laevis. Vision Res 24: 417–427
Easter SS, Stuermer CA (1984) An evaluation of the hypothesis of shifting terminals in the goldfish optic tectum. J Neurosci 4: 1052–1063
Fite KV (1973) The visual fields of the frog and toad: a comparative study. Behav Biol 9: 707–718
Fraser SE (1983) Fiber optic mapping of the Xenopus visual system: shift in the retinotectal projection during development. Dev Biol 95: 505–511
Fujisawa H (1987) Mode of growth of retinal axons within the tectum of Xenopus tadpoles, and implications in the ordered neuronal connections between the retina and tectum. J Comp Neurol 260: 127–139
Gaillard F, Galand G (1981) Mapping studies of the tectal representation of the frog binocular visual field. Exp Brain Res 44: 187–194
Gaze RM, Jacobson M (1962) The projection of the binocular visual field on the optic tecta of the frog. Q J Exp Physiol 47: 273–280
Gaze RM, Keating MJ, Szekely G, Beazley L (1970) Binocular interaction in the formation of specific intertectal neuronal connections. Proc R Soc Lond [Biol] 178: 107–147
Gaze RM, Keating MJ, Chung SH (1974) The evolution of the retinotectal map during development in Xenopus. Proc R Soc Lond [Biol] 185: 301–330
Gaze RM, Keating MJ, Ostberg A, Chung SH (1979) The relationship between retinal and tectal growth in larval Xenopus: implications for the development of the retinotectal projection. J Embryol Exp Morphol 53: 103–143
Glasser S, Ingle D (1978) The nucleus isthmi as a relay station in the ipsilateral visual projection to the frog's optic tectum. Brain Res 159: 214–218
Grant S (1982) The development and modification of binocular neuronal connections in Xenopus laevis. PhD Thesis, CNAA, London
Grant S, Keating MJ (1981) Changing patterns of neuronal connections during the normal maturation of the intertectal system in Xenopus. J Physiol (Lond) 320: 18P
Grant S, Keating MJ (1986a) Ocular migration and the metamorphic and post-metamorphic maturation of the retinotectal system in Xenopus laevis: an autoradiographic and morphometric study. J Embryol Exp Morphol 92: 43–69
Grant S, Keating MJ (1986b) Normal maturation involves systematic changes in binocular visual connections in Xenopus laevis. Nature 322: 258–261
Grant S, Keating MJ (1989) Changing patterns of binocular visual connections in the intertectal system during development of the frog, Xenopus laevis. II. Abnormalities following early visual deprivation. Exp Brain Res 75: 117–132
Grobstein P, Comer C (1977) Post-metamorphic eye migration in Rana and Xenopus. Nature 269: 54–56
Grobstein P, Comer C, Hollyday M, Archer SM (1978) A crossed isthmo-tectal projection in Rana pipiens and its involvement in the ipsilateral visuotectal projection. Brain Res 156: 117–123
Grobstein P, Comer C, Kostyk S (1980) The potential binocular field and its tectal representation in Rana pipiens. J Comp Neurol 190: 175–185
Grusser OJ, Grusser-Cornehls U (1976) Neurophysiology of the anuran visual system. In: Llinas R, Precht W (eds) Frog neurobiology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 297–406
Hitchcock PF, Easter SS (1987) Evidence for centripetally shifting terminals on the tectum of postmetamorphic Rana pipiens. J Comp Neurol 266: 556–564
Keating MJ (1968) Functional interaction in the development of specific nerve connections. J Physiol (Lond) 98: 75–77P
Keating MJ (1974) The role of visual function in the patterning of binocular visual connections. Br Med Bull 30: 145–151
Keating MJ (1977) Evidence for plasticity of intertectal neuronal connections in adult Xenopus. Philos Trans R Soc Lond [Biol] 278: 277–294
Keating MJ, Feldman JD (1975) Visual deprivation and intertectal neuronal connections in Xenopus laevis. Proc R Soc Lond [Biol] 191: 467–474
Keating MJ, Gaze RM (1970) The ipsilateral retinotectal pathway in the frog. Q J Exp Physiol 55: 284–292
Keating MJ, Kennard C (1987) Visual experience and the maturation of the ipsilateral visuotectal projection in Xenopus laevis. Neuroscience 21: 284–292
Meyer RL (1978) Evidence from thymidine labelling for continuing growth of retina and tectum in juvenile goldfish. Exp Neurol 59: 99–111
Nieuwkoop PD, Faber J (1967) A normal table of Xenopus laevis (Daudin), 2nd edn. Elsevier/North-Holland, Amsterdam New York
Niu MC, Twitty VC (1953) The differentiation of gastrula ectoderm in medium conditioned by axial mesoderm. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 39: 985–989
Raybourn MS (1975) Spatial and temporal organisation of the binocular input to frog optic tectum. Brain Behav Evol 11: 161–178
Raymond PA, Easter SS (1983) Postembryonic growth of the optic tectum in goldfish. I. Location of germinal cells and numbers of neurons produced. J Neurosci 3: 1077–1091
Reh TA, Constantine-Paton M (1983) Qualitative and quantitative measurements of plasticity during the normal development of the Rana pipiens retinotectal projection. Dev Brain Res 10: 187–200
Reh TA, Constantine-Paton M (1984) Retinal ganglion cell terminals change their projection sites during larval development of Rana pipiens. J Neurosci 4: 442–457
Schneider D (1954) Das Gesichtsfeld und der Fixiervorgang bei einheimischen Anuren. Z Vergl Physiol 36: 147–164
Scott TM, Lazar G (1976) An investigation into the hypothesis of shifting neuronal relationships during development. J Anat 121: 485–496
Udin SB (1983) Abnormal visual input leads to development of abnormal axon trajectories in frogs. Nature 301: 336–338
Udin SB (1985) The role of visual experience in the formation of binocular projections in frogs. Cell Mol Neurobiol 5: 85–102
Udin SB, Fisher MJ (1985) The development of the nucleus isthmi in Xenopus laevis. I. Cell genesis and the formation of connections with the tectum. J Comp Neurol 232: 25–35
Udin SB, Keating MJ (1981) Plasticity in a central nervous pathway in Xenopus: anatomical changes in the isthmotectal projection after larval eye rotation. J Comp Neurol 203: 575–594
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grant, S., Keating, M.J. Changing patterns of binocular visual connections in the intertectal system during development of the frog, Xenopus laevis . Exp Brain Res 75, 99–116 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00248534
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00248534