Advertisement

Journal of Philosophical Logic

, Volume 25, Issue 3, pp 221–261 | Cite as

Defaults in update semantics

  • Frank Veltman
Article

Abstract

The aim of this paper is twofold: (i) to introduce the framework of update semantics and to explain what kind of semantic phenomena may successfully be analysed in it: (ii) to give a detailed analysis of one such phenomenon: default reasoning.

Key words

dynamic semantics defaults epistemic modalities 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Asher, N. and M. Morreau: 1990, ‘Commonsense entailment: A modal theory of nonmonotonic reasoning’, in J. van Eijck (ed.), Logics in Al, Proceedings of JELIA'90, Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science 478, 1–30.Google Scholar
  2. Beaver, D.: 1991, ‘The kinematics of presupposition’, Proceedings of the 8th A'dam Colloquium.Google Scholar
  3. Carlson, G.: 1977, Reference to Kinds in English, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
  4. Delgrande, J.: 1988, ‘An approach to default reasoning based on a first-order conditional logic: Revised report’, Artificial Intelligence 36, 63–90.Google Scholar
  5. Gärdenfors, P.: 1984, ‘The dynamics of belief as a basis for logic’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 35, 1–10.Google Scholar
  6. Groenendijk, J. and M. Stokhof: 1991, ‘Dynamic predicate logic’, Linguistics and Philosophy 14, 39–101.Google Scholar
  7. Groeneveld, W.: 1994, ‘Dynamic Semantics and Circular Propositions’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 23, 267–306.Google Scholar
  8. Heim, I.R.: 1982, The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
  9. Horty, J., R. Thomason, and D. Touretzky: 1987, A Skeptical Theory of Inheritance in Non-Monotonic Nets, report CMU-CS-87-175, Carnegie Mellon University, ii+52 pp.Google Scholar
  10. Kamp, J.A.W.: 1981, ‘A theory of truth and semantic representation’, in J. Groenendijk, T.M.V. Janssen, and M. Stokhof (eds.), Formal Methods in the Study of Language, Mathematical Centre Tracts 135, Amsterdam, 277–322.Google Scholar
  11. Krifka, M.: 1987, ‘An Outline of Genericity’, SNS-Bericht 87-25, Seminar für Natürlich-Sprachliche Systeme, Universität Tübingen.Google Scholar
  12. Lewis, D.: 1973, Counterfactuals, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  13. Reiter, R.: 1980, ‘A logic for default reasoning’, in Artificial Intelligence 13, 81–132.Google Scholar
  14. Stalnaker, R.: 1974 ‘Pragmatic presuppositions’, in M. Munitz and P. Unger (eds.), Semantics and Philosophy, University Press, New York, 197–213.Google Scholar
  15. van Benthem, J.F.A.K.: 1991, Language in Action, Elsevier Science Publishers (North-Holland), Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  16. Zeevat, H.: 1992, ‘Presupposition and accomodation in update semantics’, Journal of Semantics 9, pp. 379–412.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frank Veltman
    • 1
  1. 1.ILLC/Department of PhilosophyUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations