Skip to main content
Log in

The problem of choosing the inference rule to employ

  • Basic Research Problems
  • Published:
Journal of Automated Reasoning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article is the second of a series of articles discussing various open research problems in automated reasoning. The problem proposed for research focuses on finding criteria or metarules for choosing the inference rule(s) to be employed by the automated reasoning program in use when instructing the program to complete a specific assignment. We include actual experiments that illustrate the difficulty of making an appropriate choice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Guard, J., Oglesby, F., Bennett, J., and Settle, L., ‘Semi-automated mathematics’, Journal of the ACM 16, pp. 49–62 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lifschitz, V., Personal communication (1986).

  3. Lifschitz, V., Mechanical Theorem Proving in the USSR: Leningrad School, VA, Delphic Associates (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lusk, E., McCune, W., and Overbeek, R., ‘Logic Machine Architecture: kernel functions’, pp. 70–84 in Proceedings of the Sixth Conference on Automated Deduction, Springer-Verlag Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 138, ed. D. Loveland, Springer-Verlag, New York (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lusk, E., McCune, W., and Overbeek, R., ‘Logic Machine Architecture: inference mechanisms’, pp. 85–108 in Proceedings of the Sixth Conference on Automated Deduction, Springer-Verlag Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 138, ed. D. Loveland, Springer-Verlag, New York (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  6. McCharen, J., Overbeek, R., and Wos, L., ‘Complexity and related enhancements for automated theorem-proving programs’, Computers and Mathematics with Applications 2, pp. 1–16 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Robinson, G., and Wos, L. ‘Paramodulation and theorem-proving in first-order theories with equality’, pp. 135–150 in Machine Intelligence 4, ed. B. Meltzer and D. Michie, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Robinson, J., ‘Automatic deduction with hyper-resolution’, International Journal of Computer Mathematics 1, pp. 227–234 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wos, L., Overbeek, R., Lusk, E., and Boyle, J., Automated Reasoning: Introduction and Applications, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wos, L., Automated Reasoning: 33 Basic Research Problems,Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1987).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work was supported by the Applied Mathematical Sciences subprogram of the Office of Energy Research, U.S. Department of Energy, under contract W-31-109-Eng-38.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wos, L. The problem of choosing the inference rule to employ. J Autom Reasoning 3, 201–209 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00243208

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00243208

Key Words

Navigation