Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The impacts of Proposition 13 upon the California political system: Re-regulating the intergovernmental system

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations (1980) Awakening the Slumbering Giant: Intergovernmental Relations and Federal Grant Law. Washington: ACIR.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1979) Citizen Participation in the American Federal Program. Washington, D.C.: ACIR.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1980) Significant Features of Fiscal Federalism, 1979–80 Edition. Washington, D.C.: ACIR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, S.H. (1976) The Adoption of General Revenue Sharing: A Case Study in Public Sector Politics. Public Policy 24:2, 127–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergstrom, T. (1979) Do Governments Speed Too Much? National Tax Journal 32:2, 81–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borcherding, T. (1977) Budgets and Bureaucrats. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, G. and Buchanan, J. (1979) The Logic of Tax Limits: Alternative Constitutional Constraints of The Power to Tax. National Tax Journal 32:2, 11–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaiken, J.M. and Walker, W.E. (1979) Growth in Municipal Expenditures: A Case Study of Los Angeles. Santa Monica: The RAND Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, J.I. (1981) Proposition 13 and Land Use. Lexington, Mass.: D.C. Heath/Lexington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, J.I. and Kirlin, J.J. (1979) Land Use Consequences of Proposition 13. Southern California Law Review 53:1, 95–124.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • The Citizens Conference on State Legislatures (1975) Evaluation of State Legislatures. Richard H. Leach, et al., (eds.) Dimensions of State and Urban Policy Making. New York: Macmillan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crozier, M. and Thoenig, J. (1976) The Regulation of Complex Organized Systems. Administrative Sciences Quarterly 21:4, 547–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, R. and March, J.G. (1963) A Behavioral Theory of The Firm. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danzinger, J.N. and Ring, P.S. (1980) Recent Research on Fiscal Limitation Measures: A Selective Study. Irvine, Ca.: Public Policy Research Organization, University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doerr, David R. (1979) The California Legislature's Response to Proposition 13. Southern California Law Review 53:1, 77–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • General Accounting Office. (1979) Proposition 13-How California Governments Coped With A $6 Billion Revenue Loss. Washington, D.C.: General Accounting office, United States.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, A, Madison, J., and Jay, J. (1961) The Federalist Papers. New York: Mentor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, E.K. (1978) On Non-Constitutional Management of a Constitutional Problem. Daedalus 107:1, 111–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, R. (1980) Extra-Jurisdictional Decision-Making Mechanisms in The Regional Self-Goverance of Southern California. Sacramento: Research Report prepared for the Haynes Foundation.

  • Jamison, C.C. (1979) California Tax Study: An Analysis of Taxes and Expenditures of State and Local Government in California. Los Angeles: Security Pacific National Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1980) California Tax Study: An Analysis of Revenue and Expenditure of State and Local Government in California. Los Angeles: Security Pacific National Bank, Research Department.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, A. (1964) The Conduct of Inquiry. San Francisco: Chandler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirlin, J.J. (1980) Accommodating Discontinuity: Adjusting the Political System of California to Proposition 13. Charles H. Levine and Irene Rubin (eds.), Fiscal Stress and Public Policy. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 69–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirlin, J.J. and Chapman, J.I. (1980) Active Approaches to Local Government Revenue Generation. The Urban Interest 2:2, 83–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirlin, J.J. (1982) The Political Economy of Fiscal Limits. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • --(1980) Toward a Political Perspective on (Inter) Governmental Performance in the 1980s. Sacramento, Ca.: Paper presented at the Second Annual Research Conference of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management, Boston.

  • Legislative Analyst, California Legislature (1981) Analysis of the Budget Bill, FY 1981–82. Sacramento: Legislative Analyst, California, Legislature.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, F. (1979) On Understanding Proposition 13. The Public Interest 56: 66–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipson, A. (1980) Political and Legal Responses to Proposition 13 in California. Santa Monica: The RAND Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niskanen, W. (1971) Bureaucracy and Representative Government. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakland, W. (1979) Proposition XIII — Genesis and Consequences. National Tax Journal 32:2, 387–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Management and Budget (1980) Managing Federal Assistance in the 1980s. Washington: Office of Management and Budget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. et al. (1978) Policing Metropolitan American. Washington, D.C.: United States Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascal, A. et al. (1978) Fiscal Containment of Local and State Government. Santa Monica: The RAND Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ries, J.C. (1969) Executives in The American Political System. Belmont, Ca.: Dickenson Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, J. (1981) The Great Slowdown in State and Local Government Spending in the United States: 1976–1984. Washington, D.C.: Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • State of California, Fair Political Practices Commission (1980) Campaign Costs: How Much Have They Increased and Why? Sacramento: The California Fair Political Practices Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1981) Sources of Contributions to California State Legislative Candidates for the November 4, 1980 General Election. Sacramento: Fair Political Practices Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • State of California, Office of Planning and Research (1980) The Growth Revolt: Aftershock of Proposition 13? Sacramento: State of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stumpf, J. and Terrell, P. (1979) Proposition 13 and California Human Services. Milbrae, California: National Association of Social Workers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J.D. (1967) Organizations in Action. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Bureau of the Census. (1980) Regional Organizations (Topical Studies, Vol. 6, 1977 Census of Governments). Washington, D.C.: USGPO, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, W.E. et al. (1980) The Impact of Proposition 13 on Local Criminal Justice Agencies: Emerging Patterns. Santa Monica: The RAND Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. (1976) Educational Organizations as Loosely Coupled Systems. Administrative Sciences Quarterly 21:1, 1–18.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA

    John J. Kirlin

Authors
  1. John J. Kirlin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kirlin, J.J. The impacts of Proposition 13 upon the California political system: Re-regulating the intergovernmental system. Public Choice 39, 147–169 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00242153

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00242153

Keywords

Search

Navigation