Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Value of polydirectional tomography in the assessment of the postoperative spine after anterior decompression and vertebral body autografting

  • Articles
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the growing number of orthopedic reconstructive spinal procedures, the use of bone grafting has steadily increased in the past decade. An understanding of the biology of bone grafting is essential for both the clinician and radiologist. Despite the advent of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, conventional polydirectional tomography remains an important tool in the evaluation of vertebral body autografts. Trispiral or hypocycloidal tomography plays a valuable role in the assessment of bone graft fusion and possible complications, especially in the presence of metallic fixation devices. We present our imaging experience derived from 375 patients with cervical, thoracic, or lumbar anterior spinal fusion. True graft complications occurred in 27 patients (7%) and consisted of fracture (4%), malpositioning (3%), and infection (<1%).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bohlman HH, Eismont FJ (1981) Surgical techniques of anterior decompression and fusion for spinal cord injury. Clin Orthop 154:57

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cotler HB, Cotler JM, Stoloff A, et al. (1985) The use of autografts for vertebral body replacement of the thoracic and lumbar spine. Spine 10:748

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cotler JM, Star AM (1990) Complications of spinal fusion. In: Cotler JM, Cotler HB (eds) Spinal fusion: science and technique. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, p 361

    Google Scholar 

  4. Friedlaender GE (1987) Bone grafts. The basic science rationale for clinical applications. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 69:786

    Google Scholar 

  5. Friedlaender GE, Huo M (1991) Bone grafts and bone graft substitutes. In: Frymoyer JW (ed) The adult spine. Principles and practice. Raven Press, New York, p 565

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gross TP, Jinnah RH, Clarke HJ, Cox QGN (1991) The biology of bone grafting. Orthopedics 14:563

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kaufman HH, Jones E (1989) The principles of bony spinal fusion. Neurosurgery 24:264

    Google Scholar 

  8. Littleton J (1988) Conventional pluridirectional tomography. In: Kricun M (ed) Imaging modalities in spinal disorders. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, p 289

    Google Scholar 

  9. Prolo DJ, Rodrigo JJ (1985) Contemporary bone graft physiology and surgery. Clin Orthop 200:322

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wittenberg RH, Moeller J, Shea M, White AA, Hayes WC (1990) Compressive strength of autologous and allogenous bone grafts for thoracolumbar and cervical spine fusion. Spine 15:1073

    Google Scholar 

  11. Yeakley JW, Harris JH (1990) Imaging of spinal fusions. In: Cotler JM, Cotler HB (eds) Spinal fusion. Science and technique. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, p 335

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Karasick, D., Huettl, E.A. & Cotler, J.M. Value of polydirectional tomography in the assessment of the postoperative spine after anterior decompression and vertebral body autografting. Skeletal Radiol. 21, 359–363 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00241813

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00241813

Key words

Navigation