Abstract
Humans preserve grasp stability by automatically regulating the grip forces when loads are applied tangentially to the grip surfaces of a manipulandum held in a precision grip. The effects of the direction of the load force in relation to the palm, trunk, and gravity were investigated in blindfolded subjects. Controlled, tangential load-forces were delivered in an unpredictable manner to the grip surface in contact with the index finger either in the distal and proximal directions (away from and toward the palm) or in the ulnar and radial directions (transverse to the palm). The hand was oriented in: (1) a standard position, with the forearm extended horizontally and anteriorly in intermediate pronosupination; (2) an inverted position, reversing the direction of radial and ulnar loads in relation to gravity; and (3) a horizontally rotated position, in which distal loads were directed toward the trunk. The amplitude of the grip-force responses (perpendicular to the grip surface) varied with the direction of load in a manner reflecting frictional anisotropies at the digit-object interface; that is, the subjects automatically scaled the grip responses to provide similar safety margins against frictional slips. For all hand positions, the time from onset of load increase to start of the gripforce increase was shorter for distal loads, which tended to pull the object out of the hand, than for proximal loads. Furthermore, this latency was shorter for loads in the direction of gravity, regardless of hand position. Thus, shorter latencies were observed when frictional forces alone opposed the load, while longer latencies occurred when gravity also opposed the load or when the more proximal parts of the digits and palm were positioned in the path of the load. These latency effects were due to different processing delays in the central nervous system and may reflect the preparation of a default response in certain critical directions. The response to loads in other directions would incur delays required to implement a new frictional scaling and a different muscle activation pattern to counteract the load forces. We conclude that load direction, referenced to gravity and to the hand's geometry, represents intrinsic task variables in the automatic processes that maintain a stable grasp on objects subjected to unpredictable load forces. In contrast, the grip-force safety margin against frictional slips did not vary systematically with respect to these task variables. Instead, the magnitude of the grip-force responses varied across load direction and hand orientation according to frictional differences providing similar safety margins supporting grasp stability.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berthoz A (1991) Reference frames for the perception and control of movement. In: Paillard J (ed) Brain and space. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 81–111
Cole KJ, Abbs JH (1988) Grip force adjustments evoked by load force perturbations of grasped object. J Neurophysiol 60:1513–1522
Cole KJ, Johansson RS (1993) Friction at the digit-object interface scales the sensorimotor transformation for grip responses to pulling loads. Exp Brain Res 95:523–532
Favilla M, Hening W, Ghez C (1989) Trajectory control in targeted force impulses. VI. Independent specification of response amplitude and direction. Exp Brain Res 75:280–294
Favilla M, Gordon J, Hening W, Ghez G (1990) Trajectory control in targeted force impulses. VII. Independent setting of amplitude and direction in response preparation. Exp Brain Res 79:530–538
Flanagan JR, Tresilian JR (1994) Grip load force coupling — a general control strategy for transporting objects. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 20:944–957
Goodwin AW, John KT, Sathian K, Darian-Smith I (1989) Spatial and temporal factors determining afferent fiber responses to a grating moving sinusoidally over the monkey's fingerpad. J Neurosci 9:1280–1293
Gordon AM, Westling G, Cole K, Johansson RS (1993) Memory representations underlying motor commands used during manipulation of common and novel objects. J Neurophysiol 69:1789–1796
Hagbarth K-E, Hongell A, Hallin RG, Torebjörk HE (1970) Afferent impulses in median nerve fascicles evoked by tactile stimuli of the human hand. Brain Res 24:423–442
Häger-Ross CK, Johansson RS (1996) Non digital afferent input in reactive control of fingertip forces during precision grip. Exp Brain Res 110:131–141
Hick WE (1952) On the rate of gain of information. Q J Exp Psychol 4:11–26
Iberall T, Bingham G, Arbib MA (1986) Opposition space as a structuring concept for the analysis of skilled hand movements. In: Exp Brain Res Series 15. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 158–173
Jeannerod M (1994) Object oriented action. In: Bennett KMB, Castiello U (eds) Insights into the reach and grasp movement. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp 3–15
Johansson RS (1978) Tactile sensibility in the human hand: receptive field characteristics of mechanoreceptive units in the glabrous skin area. J Physiol (Lond) 281:101–123
Johansson RS, Vallbo ÅB (1979) Tactile sensibility in the human hand: relative and absolute densities of four types of units in the glabrous skin. J Physiol (Lond) 286:283–300
Johansson RS, Westling G (1984) Roles of glabrous skin receptors sensorimotor memory in automatic control of precision when lifting rougher or more slippery objects. Exp Brain Res 56:550–564
Johansson RS, Westling G (1987) Signals in tactile afferent from fingers eliciting adaptive motor responses during grip. Exp Brain Res 66:141–154
Johansson RS, Westling G (1988a) Coordinated isometric muscle commands adequately and erroneously programmed to the weight during lifting task with precision grip. Exp Brain Res 71:59–71
Johansson RS, Westling G (1988b) Programmed and triggered actions to load changes during precision grip. Exp Brain Res 71:72–86
Johansson RS, Riso R, Häger C, Bäckström L (1992a) Somatosensory control of precision grip during unpredictable pulling loads. I. Changes in load force amplitude. Exp Brain Res 89:181–191
Johansson RS, Häger C, Riso R (1992b) Somatosensory control of the precision grip during unpredictable pulling loads. II. Changes in load force rate. Exp Brain Res 89:192–203
Johansson RS, Häger C, Bäckström L (1992c) Somatosensory control of precision grip during unpredictable pulling loads. III. Impairments during digital anesthesia. Exp Brain Res 89:204–213
Jones LA, Hunter IW (1992) Changes in pinch force with load forces. J Mot Behav 24:157–164
Knibestöl M, Vallbo Å (1970) Single unit analysis of mechanoreceptor activity from the human glabrous skin. Acta Physiol Scand 80:178–195
Lacquaniti F, Borghese NA, Carrozzo M (1992) Internal models of geometry in the control of hand compliance. J Neurosci 12:1750–1762.
Macefield VG, Johansson RS (1996) Control of grip force during restrain of an object held between finger and thumb:Responses of muscle and joint afferents from the digits. Exp Brain Res 108:172–184
Macefield VG, Häger-Ross C, Johansson RS (1996) Control of grip force during restraint of an object held between the finger an thumb: responses of cutaneous afferents from the digits. Exp Brain Res 108:155–171
Moore DF (1972) The friction and lubrication of elastomers. Pergamon, New York
Paillard J (1991) Motor and representational framing of space. In: Paillard J (ed) Brain and space. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 163–182
Siegel S, Castellan NJ (1988) Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York
Soechting JF, Flanders M (1992) Moving in three dimensional space, frames of reference, vectors, and co-ordinate systems. Annu Rev Neurosci 15:167–191
Srinivasan MA, Whitehouse JM, LaMotte RH (1990) Tactile detection of slip: surface microgeometry and peripheral neural codes. J Neurophysiol 63:1323–1332
Vallbo ÅB, Hagbarth K-E (1968) Activity from skin mechanoreceptors recorded percutaneously in awake human subjects. Exp Neurol 21:270–289
Westling G, Johansson R (1984) Factors influencing the force control during precision grip. Exp Brain Res 53:277–284
Westling G, Johansson R (1987) Responses in glabrous skin mechanoreceptors during precision grip in humans. Exp Brain Res 66:128–140
Winstein CJ, Abbs JH, Petashnick D (1991) Influences of object weight and instruction on grip force adjustments. Exp Brain Res 87:465–469
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Häger-Ross, C., Cole, K.J. & Johansson, R.S. Grip-force responses to unanticipated object loading: load direction reveals body- and gravity-referenced intrinsic task variables. Exp Brain Res 110, 142–150 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00241383
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00241383