Boundary-Layer Meteorology

, Volume 7, Issue 3, pp 267–287 | Cite as

Geostrophic departure and the functions A and B of Rossby-number similarity theory

  • R. H. Clarke
  • G. D. Hess


A new empirical assessment of the functions A and B of Rossby-number similarity theory is made based on the Wangara data. Variations of these functions with stability, baroclinicity and time of day are discussed. It is found that B is dependent on stability in agreement with older data but contradicting the prediction of Csanady (1972). Coefficients expressing the variation of A and B with the two components of baroclinicity have been derived from the data, and these are claimed to be correct in regard to sign and approximately in regard to magnitude. Longer period time changes, represented by the diurnal cycle, are shown to result in systematic differences in A and B between the case of increasing stability and that of decreasing stability, for the same value of the stability parameter.

The first attempt, to our knowledge, to present the actual functional form of the wind departure components (based on field data) is made. As the surface layer is approached in near-neutral conditions, the departure component in the direction of the surface wind assumes the expected logarithmic form.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arya, S. P. S.: 1974, ‘Geostrophic Drag and Heat Transfer Relations for the Atmospheric Boundary Layer’, to be published.Google Scholar
  2. Blackadar, A. K.: 1965, ‘A Single Layer Theory of the Vertical Distribution of Wind in a Baroclinic Neutral Atmospheric Boundary Layer’, in Flux of Heat and Momentum in the Planetary Boundary Layer of the Atmosphere', Final report, pp. 1–22, Penn. State Univ., Meteorology Dept., Contract AFCRL-65-531.Google Scholar
  3. Bradley, E. F.: 1972, The Influence of Thermal Stability on a Drag Coefficient Measured Close to the Ground, Agric. Meteorol. 9, 183–190.Google Scholar
  4. Clarke, R. H.: 1970a, Observational Studies in the Atmospheric Boundary Layer, Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 96, 91–114.Google Scholar
  5. Clarke, R. H.: 1970b, Recommended Methods for the Treatment of the Boundary Layer in Numerical Models, Australian Meteorol. Mag. 18, 51–73.Google Scholar
  6. Clarke, R. H.: 1972, Discussion of “Observational Studies in the Atmospheric Boundary Layer”, Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 98, 234–235.Google Scholar
  7. Clarke, R. H.: 1973, Note on the Variability of Empirical Determinations of the Functions A(Μ) and B(Μ) of Rossby-Number Similarity Theory, Beiträge Phys. Atmos. 46, 64–65.Google Scholar
  8. Clarke, R. H. and Hess, G. D.: 1973, On the Appropriate Scaling for Velocity and Temperature in the Planetary Boundary Layer, J. Atmospheric Sci. 30, 1346–1353.Google Scholar
  9. Clarke, R. H., Dyer, A. J., Brook, R. R., Reid, D. G., and Troup, A. J.: 1971, ‘The Wangara Experiment: Boundary Layer Data‘, Technical Paper No. 19, CSIRO, Div. Meteorol. Phys. 362 pp.Google Scholar
  10. Csanady, G. T.: 1972, Geostrophic Drag, Heat and Mass Transfer Coefficients for the Diabatic Ekman Layer, J. Atmospheric Sci. 29, 488–496.Google Scholar
  11. Csanady, G. T.: 1973, Reply to Comments on “Geostrophic Drag, Heat and Mass Transfer Coefficients for the Diabatic Ekman Layer”, J. Atmospheric Sci. 30, 155–156.Google Scholar
  12. Deacon, E. L.: 1957, Wind Profiles and Shearing Stress — an Anomaly Resolved, Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 83, 537–540.Google Scholar
  13. Deacon, E. L.: 1973, Geostrophic Drag Coefficients, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 5, 321–340.Google Scholar
  14. Deardorff, J. W.: 1972, Numerical Investigation of Neutral and Unstable Planetary Boundary Layers, J. Atmospheric Sci. 29, 91–115.Google Scholar
  15. Fiedler, F.: 1972, The Effect of Baroclinicity on the Resistance Law in a Diabatic Ekman Layer, Beiträge Phys. Atmos. 45, 164–173.Google Scholar
  16. Gill, A. E.: 1968, Similarity Theory and Geostrophic Adjustment, Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 94, 586–588.Google Scholar
  17. Hess, G. D.: 1973, On Rossby-Number Similarity Theory for a Baroclinic Planetary Boundary Layer, J. Atmospheric Sci. 30, 1722–1723.Google Scholar
  18. Kazansky, A. B. and Monin, A. S.: 1960, A Turbulent Regime Above the Ground Atmospheric Layer, Izv Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R. Geophys. Ser. 1, 110–112.Google Scholar
  19. Swinbank, W. C. and Dyer, A. J.: 1968, ‘Micrometeorological Experiments 1962–1964’, Technical Paper No. 17, CSIRO, Div. Meteorol. Phys. 48 pp.Google Scholar
  20. Vager, B. G. and Zilitinkevich, S. S.: 1968, A Theoretical Model of the Daily Oscillation of Meteorological Fields, Meteorol. Hydrol. U.S.S.R. 7, 3–18.Google Scholar
  21. Webb, E. K.: 1970, Profile Relationships: the Log-Linear Range, and Extension to Strong Stability, Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 96, 67–90.Google Scholar
  22. Wippermann, F.: 1972, Baroclinic Effects on the Resistance Law of the Planetary Boundary Layer of the Atmosphere, Beiträge Phys. Atmos. 45, 244–259.Google Scholar
  23. Zilitinkevich, S. S. and Chalikov, D. V.: 1968, The Laws of Resistance and of Heat and Moisture Exchange in the Interaction Between the Atmosphere and Underlying Surface, Izv. Atmospheric Oceanic Phys. 4, 438–441.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. H. Clarke
    • 1
  • G. D. Hess
    • 1
  1. 1.CSIRO Division of Atmospheric PhysicsAspendaleAustralia

Personalised recommendations