Abstract
Standard economic theory states that regulation by price is more efficient than regulation by command and control. Exceptions may arise if regulators have good knowledge of the supply curve. In practice, though, governments usually regulate by command and control and do so when there is uncertainty about the technology of supply. We show that government may prefer to regulate by command and control when it cares about the investment decisions of a firm.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alesina, Alberto, and Guido Tabellini. 1988. “Credibility and politics.” European Economic Review 32: 542–550.
Barro Gordon, and David Gordon. 1983. “Rules, discretion, and reputation in a model of monetary policy.” Journal of Monetary Economics 12: 101–121.
Barthold, Thomas A. 1994. “Issues in the design of environmental excise taxes.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 8(1): 133–151.
Buchanan, J., and G. Tullock. 1975. “Polluters' profits and political response: Direct controls vs. taxes.” American Economic Review 65: 139–147.
Chao, H.P., and R. Wilson. 1993. “Option value of emission allowances.” Journal of Regulatory Economics 5(3): 233–249.
Dixit, Avinash. 1992. “Investment and hysteresis.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 6(1): 107–132.
Glazer, Amihai. 1989. “Politics and the choice of durability.” American Economic Review 79(5): 1207–1213.1.
Goodwin, T.H., and R.H. Patrick. 1992. “Capital recovery for the regulated firm under certainty and regulatory uncertainty.” Resources and Energy 14(4): 337–361.
Kotlikoff, Laurence J, Torsten Persson, and Lars E.O. Svensson. 1988. “Social contracts as assets: A possible solution to the time-consistency problem.” American Economic Review 78: 662–677.
Kydland, Finn E., and Edward C. Prescott. 1977. “Rules rather than discretion: The inconsistency of optimal plans.” Journal of Political Economy 85(3): 473–491.
Leone, Robert A., and Thomas Parkinson. 1990. “Conserving energy: Is there a better way?” Mimeo, Putnam, Hayes & Bartlett, Inc.
Persson, Torsten. 1988. “Credibility of macroeconomic policy: An introduction and a broad survey.” European Economic Review 32: 519–32.
Phelps, Edmund S., and Robert A. Pollak. 1968. “On second-best saving and game-equilibrium growth.” Review of Economic Studies 35: 185–200.
Pindyck, R.S. 1991. “Irreversibility, uncertainty, and investment.” Journal of Economic Literature 29: 1110–1148.
Strotz, Robert. 1955. “Myopia and inconsistency in dynamic utility maximization.” Review of Economics Studies 23: 165–180.
Tabellini Guido, and Alberto Alesina. 1990. “Voting on the budget deficit.” American Economic Review 80(1): 37–49.
Weitzman, Martin L. 1974. “Prices vs. quantities.” Review of Economic Studies 41: 477–491.
Wittman, Donald. 1983. “Candidate motivation: A synthesis of alternative theories.” American Political Science Review 72: 78–90.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
We are grateful for comments by Kenneth Small, the editor, and two anonymous referees.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Glazer, A., Lave, C. Regulation by prices and by command. J Regul Econ 9, 191–197 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00240370
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00240370